Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Only \(0.1 \%\) of the individuals in a certain population have a particular disease (an incidence rate of .001). Of those who have the disease, \(95 \%\) test positive when a certain diagnostic test is applied. Of those who do not have the disease, \(90 \%\) test negative when the test is applied. Suppose that an individual from this population is randomly selected and given the test. a. Construct a tree diagram having two first-generation branches, for has disease and doesn't have disease, and two second-generation branches leading out from each of these, for positive test and negative test. Then enter appropriate probabilities on the four branches. b. Use the general multiplication rule to calculate \(P(\) has disease and positive test). c. Calculate \(P\) (positive test). d. Calculate \(P\) (has disease \(\mid\) positive test). Does the result surprise you? Give an intuitive explanation for the size of this probability.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The probabilities are: a) For individuals having the disease and testing positive, it is \(0.00095\); b) The overall probability of testing positive is \(0.10085\); c) The probability of having the disease given a positive test is \(0.00942\). The result may be surprisingly low due to the high incidence of false positive tests arising from low disease prevalence.

Step by step solution

01

Construct a tree diagram

A. Construct a tree diagram with first-generation branches representing having the disease and not having the disease. Under having disease, attach two second-generation branches indicating testing positive and testing negative. Do likewise for the 'not having a disease' branch. The probabilities that go with each branch are: has disease \(0.1\%\), doesn't have disease \(99.9\%\), for those with disease, test positive \(95\%\) and test negative \(5\%\), for those without disease, test positive \(10\%\) and test negative \(90\%\).
02

Calculation of \(P(\) has disease and positive test).

B. Apply the general multiplication rule, which is \(P(A and B) = P(A)∗P(B|A)\), where A signifies 'has disease' and B denotes 'tests positive'. For those having the disease, the probability of testing positive is \(0.001 * 0.95 = 0.00095\).
03

Calculation of \(P\) (positive test).

C. The probability of a positive test is the sum of the probabilities of those who have the disease and test positive, plus those who do not have the disease but also test positive. That is \(P(\)Disease Positive) + P(\)No Disease Positive) = \(0.00095 + 0.999 * 0.1 = 0.10085\).
04

Calculation of \(P\) (has disease | positive test.

D. The probability of having the disease given a positive test is calculated by applying Bayes' theorem: \(P(\)Disease|Positive) = \(\frac{P(Disease Positive)}{P(Positive)}\) = \(\frac{0.00095}{0.10085} = 0.00942\). This probability may seem unexpectedly low. The reason is that even though the test is quite accurate, the disease is very rare. So, most people who test positive are actually healthy people who received a false positive test result.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to the following information on births in the United States over a given period of time: $$ \begin{array}{lr} \text { Type of Birth } & \text { Number of Births } \\ \hline \text { Single birth } & 41,500,000 \\ \text { Twins } & 500,000 \\ \text { Triplets } & 5000 \\ \text { Quadruplets } & 100 \\ & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Use this information to approximate the probability that a randomly selected pregnant woman who reaches full term a. Delivers twins b. Delivers quadruplets c. Gives birth to more than a single child

The article "Anxiety Increases for Airline Passengers After Plane Crash" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, November 13,2001 ) reported that air passengers have a 1 in 11 million chance of dying in an airplane crash. This probability was then interpreted as "You could fly every day for 26,000 years before your number was up." Comment on why this probability interprctation is mislcading.

\(6.4\) A tennis shop sells five different brands of rackets, each of which comes in either a midsize version or an oversize version. Consider the chance experiment in which brand and size are noted for the next racket purchased. One possible outcome is Head midsize, and another is Prince oversize. Possible outcomes correspond to cells in the following table: $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline & \text { Head } & \text { Prince } & \text { Slazenger } & \text { Wimbledon } & \text { Wilson } \\ \hline \text { Midsize } & & & & & \\ \hline \text { Oversize } & & & & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Let \(A\) denote the event that an oversize racket is purchased. List the outcomes in \(A\). b. Let \(B\) denote the event that the name of the brand purchased begins with a W. List the outcomes in \(B\). c. List the outcomes in the event \(n o t \bar{B}\). d. Head, Prince, and Wilson are U.S. companies. Let \(C\) denote the event that the racket purchased is made by a U.S. company. List the outcomes in the event \(B\) or \(C\). e. List outcomes in \(B\) and \(C\). f. Display the possible outcomes on a tree diagram, with a first-generation branch for each brand.

The Australian newspaper The Mercury (May 30 , 1995) reported that, based on a survey of 600 reformed and current smokers, \(11.3 \%\) of those who had attempted to quit smoking in the previous 2 years had used a nicotine aid (such as a nicotine patch). It also reported that \(62 \%\) of those who quit smoking without a nicotine aid be gan smoking again within 2 weeks and \(60 \%\) of those who used a nicotine aid began smoking again within 2 weeks. If a smoker who is trying to quit smoking is selected at random, are the events selected smoker who is trying to quit uses a nicotine aid and selected smoker who has attempted to quit begins smoking again within 2 weeks inde pendent or dependent events? Justify your answer using the given information.

Suppose that we define the following events: \(C=\) event that a randomly selected driver is observed to be using a cell phone, \(A=\) event that a randomly selected driver is observed driving a passenger automobile, \(V=\) event that a randomly selected driver is observed driving a van or SUV, and \(T=\) event that a randomly selected driver is observed driving a pickup truck. Based on the article "Three Percent of Drivers on Hand-Held Cell Phones at Any Given Time" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, July 24, 2001), the following probability estimates are reasonable: \(P(C)=.03\), \(P(C \mid A)=.026, P(C \mid V)=.048\), and \(P(C \mid T)=.019 .\) Ex- plain why \(P(C)\) is not just the average of the three given conditional probabilities.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free