Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A construction firm bids on two different contracts. Let \(E_{1}\) be the event that the bid on the first contract is successful, and define \(E_{2}\) analogously for the second contract. Suppose that \(P\left(E_{1}\right)=.4\) and \(P\left(E_{2}\right)=.2\) and that \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) are independent events. a. Calculate the probability that both bids are successful (the probability of the event \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) ). b. Calculate the probability that neither bid is successful (the probability of the event \(\left(\right.\) not \(\left.E_{1}\right)\) and \(\left(\right.\) not \(\left.E_{2}\right)\) ). c. What is the probability that the firm is successful in at least one of the two bids?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The probability that both bids are successful is 0.08. b. The probability that neither bid is successful is 0.48. c. The probability that at least one bid is successful is 0.52.

Step by step solution

01

Calculating the Probability that Both Bids are Successful

Given the two events \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) are independent, the probability of both events occurring simultaneously is the product of their individual probabilities. Therefore, the probability that both bids are successful, \(P(E_{1} \cap E_{2})\), can be calculated using the formula \(P(E_{1}) \cdot P(E_{2})\). From the problem, \(P(E_{1}) = 0.4\) and \(P(E_{2}) = 0.2\). So, \(P(E_{1} \cap E_{2}) = 0.4 \cdot 0.2 = 0.08\).
02

Calculating the Probability that Neither Bids is Successful

The probability of the complement of an event can be calculated as \(1 - P(E)\). Given that events \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) are independent, the probability that neither event occurs (not \(E_{1}\) and not \(E_{2}\)) is the product of their individual complement probabilities. The calculation would be as follows: \(P(\neg E_{1}) = 1 - P(E_{1}) = 1 - 0.4 = 0.6, P(\neg E_{2}) = 1 - P(E_{2}) = 1 - 0.2 = 0.8\), so \(P(\neg E_{1} \cap \neg E_{2}) = P(\neg E_{1}) \cdot P(\neg E_{2}) = 0.6 \cdot 0.8 = 0.48\).
03

Calculating the Probability that at Least One Bid is Successful

The event that at least one bid is successful is the complement of the event that neither bid is successful. So, its probability can be calculated as \(P(\left(E_{1} \cup E_{2}\right) = 1 - P(\neg E_{1} \cap \neg E_{2}) = 1 - 0.48 = 0.52\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Independence
Understanding the concept of statistical independence is crucial when analyzing the relationship between two events. In probability theory, two events are considered to be statistically independent if the occurrence of one event has no effect on the probability of the occurrence of the other. To put it simply, knowing that one event has occurred does not change the likelihood of the other event happening.

For example, in the exercise provided, the fact that the construction firm is successful in one contract bid does not influence the outcome of the other bid. The events are independent, and their probabilities can be multiplied to find the combined probability of both events occurring. Formally, this relationship is expressed as:
\[ P(E_1 \cap E_2) = P(E_1) \cdot P(E_2) \].

It is important to note that independence is a theoretical assumption and may not always reflect real-world situations. Furthermore, the probability of independent events never adds up to more than 1, as they are separate occurrences not affecting each other.
Complement of an Event
The complement of an event is a fundamental concept in probability and represents all outcomes that are not part of the event itself. Formally, the complement of an event \(E\) is denoted as \(eg E\) and essentially captures the notion of 'everything else that can happen in our sample space outside of event \(E\)'.

If you're told that the probability of a certain event is, say, 0.4, then you can instantly determine that the probability of the event not happening is 0.6, because \(P(eg E) = 1 - P(E)\). This is precisely what we did in the textbook exercise for each bid. The calculation of the probability that neither bid is successful is also a direct application of this concept, where you multiply the probabilities of the complements of each independent event.

Another useful application of this concept is that it can help you determine the probability of at least one event occurring. By finding the probability that neither event occurs and then taking the complement of that, you're left with the probability that at least one event occurs, which is what part (c) of the exercise asked for.
Union of Events
The union of two events, denoted as \(E_1 \cup E_2\), represents the occurrence of at least one of the events. It's the event that either \(E_1\), \(E_2\), or both take place. In simpler terms, it's like saying 'either this or that or both.' This is particularly important for compound events where multiple outcomes are favorable.

Calculating the probability of the union of independent events requires careful attention. For mutually exclusive events (events that cannot happen at the same time), the probability of their union is the sum of their individual probabilities. However, when events are not mutually exclusive, as in they can both happen together, we must correct for the fact that we have counted the intersection twice. This correction leads us to the principle of inclusion-exclusion:
\[ P(E_1 \cup E_2) = P(E_1) + P(E_2) - P(E_1 \cap E_2) \].

In the context of the exercise, we were looking for the probability of at least one contract being successful. Since we learned that neither contract affects the other (independence), this can be simplified by finding the probability that both contracts fail and subtracting from one. Using the concept of the complement, this yields the probability of the union without having to add individual probabilities and subtract the intersection.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A transmitter is sending a message using a binary code, namely, a sequence of 0's and 1's. Each transmitted bit \((0\) or 1\()\) must pass through three relays to reach the receiver. At each relay, the probability is \(.20\) that the bit sent on is different from the bit received (a reversal). Assume that the relays operate independently of one another: transmitter \(\rightarrow\) relay \(1 \rightarrow\) relay \(2 \rightarrow\) relay \(3 \rightarrow\) receiver a. If a 1 is sent from the transmitter, what is the probability that a 1 is sent on by all three relays? b. If a 1 is sent from the transmitter, what is the probability that a 1 is received by the receiver? (Hint: The eight experimental outcomes can be displayed on a tree diagram with three generations of branches, one generation for each relay.)

A college library has four copies of a certain book; the copies are numbered \(1,2,3\), and 4 . Two of these are selected at random. The first selected book is placed on 2 -hr reserve, and the second book can be checked out overnight. a. Construct a tree diagram to display the 12 outcomes in the sample space. b. Let \(A\) denote the event that at least one of the books selected is an even-numbered copy. What outcomes are in \(A ?\) c. Suppose that copies 1 and 2 are first printings, whereas copies 3 and 4 are second printings. Let \(B\) denote the event that exactly one of the copies selected is a first printing. What outcomes are contained in \(B\) ?

Three friends \((\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}\), and \(\mathrm{C})\) will participate in a round-robin tournament in which each one plays both of the others. Suppose that \(P(\) A beats \(B)=.7, P(\) A beats \(C)=.8\), \(P(\mathrm{~B}\) beats \(\mathrm{C})=.6\), and that the outcomes of the three matches are independent of one another. a. What is the probability that \(\mathrm{A}\) wins both her matches and that B beats C? b. What is the probability that A wins both her matches? c. What is the probability that A loses both her matches? d. What is the probability that each person wins one match? (Hint: There are two different ways for this to happen.)

The Los Angeles Times (June 14,1995 ) reported that the U.S. Postal Service is getting speedier, with higher overnight on-time delivery rates than in the past. The Price Waterhouse accounting firm conducted an independent audit by seeding the mail with letters and recording ontime delivery rates for these letters. Suppose that the results were as follows (these numhers are fictitions hut are compatible with summary values given in the article): $$ \begin{array}{lcc} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Number } \\ \text { of Letters } \\ \text { Mailed } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Number of } \\ \text { Lefters Arriving } \\ \text { on Time } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Los Angeles } & 500 & 425 \\ \text { New York } & 500 & 415 \\ \text { Washington, D.C. } & 500 & 405 \\ \text { Nationwide } & 6000 & 5220 \\ & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Use the given information to estimate the following probabilities: a. The probability of an on-time delivery in Los Angeles b. The probability of late delivery in Washington, D.C. c. The probability that two letters mailed in New York are both delivered on time d. The probability of on-time delivery nationwide

The article "Anxiety Increases for Airline Passengers After Plane Crash" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, November 13,2001 ) reported that air passengers have a 1 in 11 million chance of dying in an airplane crash. This probability was then interpreted as "You could fly every day for 26,000 years before your number was up." Comment on why this probability interprctation is mislcading.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free