Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A deck of 52 cards is mixed well, and 5 cards are dealt. a. It can be shown that (disregarding the order in which the cards are dealt) there are \(2,598,960\) possible hands, of which only 1287 are hands consisting entirely of spades. What is the probability that a hand will consist entirely of spades? What is the probability that a hand will consist entirely of a single suit? b. It can be shown that exactly 63,206 hands contain only spades and clubs, with both suits represented. What is the probability that a hand consists entirely of spades and clubs with both suits represented? c. Using the result of Part (b), what is the probability that a hand contains cards from exactly two suits?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The probabilities are as follows: a. The probability that a hand will consist entirely of spades is \(\frac{1287}{2598960}\). The probability that a hand will consist entirely of a single suit is \(4 * \frac{1287}{2598960}\). b. The probability that a hand consists entirely of spades and clubs with both suits represented is \(\frac{63206}{2598960}\). c. The probability that a hand contains cards from exactly two suits is \(6 * \frac{63206}{2598960}\).

Step by step solution

01

Probability of a hand consisting entirely of spades

The probability is calculated as the ratio of the number of favorable outcomes to the total number of outcomes. Here, it's known that there are 1,287 hands consisting entirely of spades out of a total of 2,598,960 hands. So, the probability is calculated as \(\frac{1287}{2598960}\)
02

Probability of a hand consisting entirely of a single suit

Remember that a deck of cards consists of 4 different suits: spades, hearts, diamonds, and clubs. So the probability of getting a hand consisting entirely of any single suit would be four times the probability of getting a hand consisting entirely of spades. So, the probability would be \(4 * \frac{1287}{2598960}\)
03

Probability of a hand consisting entirely of spades and clubs

Again, the probability is calculated as the ratio of the number of favorable outcomes to the total number of outcomes. Here, it's known that there are 63,206 hands consisting entirely of spades and clubs (with both suits represented) out of a total of 2,598,960 hands. So, the probability is calculated as \(\frac{63206}{2598960}\)
04

Probability of a hand containing cards from exactly two suits

A standard deck has 4 different suits, so there are \(\binom{4}{2} = 6\) ways to select 2 suits. Now from the results in Step 3, each has the probability \(\frac{63206}{2598960}\). So, the probability of a hand containing cards from exactly two suits would be \(6 * \frac{63206}{2598960}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The USA Today article referenced in Exercise \(6.37\) also gave information on seat belt usage by age, which is summarized in the following table of counts: $$ \begin{array}{lcc} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Does Not Use } \\ \text { Seat Belt } \\ \text { Regularly } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Uses } \\ \text { Seat Belt } \\ \text { Regularly } \end{array} \\ \hline 18-24 & 59 & 41 \\ 25-34 & 73 & 27 \\ 35-44 & 74 & 26 \\ 45-54 & 70 & 30 \\ 55-64 & 70 & 30 \\ 65 \text { and older } & 82 & 18 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Consider the following events: \(S=\) event that a randomly selected individual uses a seat belt regularly, \(A_{1}=\) event that a randomly selected individual is in age group \(18-24\), and \(A_{6}=\) event that a randomly selected individual is in age group 65 and older. a. Convert the counts to proportions and then use them to compute the following probabilities: i. \(P\left(A_{1}\right)\) ii. \(P\left(A_{1} \cap S\right)\) iii. \(P\left(A_{1} \mid S\right)\) iv. \(P\left(\right.\) not \(\left.A_{1}\right) \quad\) v. \(P\left(S \mid A_{1}\right) \quad\) vi. \(P\left(S \mid A_{6}\right)\) b. Using the probabilities \(P\left(S \mid A_{1}\right)\) and \(P\left(S \mid A_{6}\right)\) computed in Part (a), comment on how \(18-24\) -year-olds and seniors differ with respect to seat belt usage.

A shipment of 5000 printed circuit boards contains 40 that are defective. Two boards will be chosen at random, without replacement. Consider the two events \(E_{1}=\) event that the first board selected is defective and \(E_{2}=\) event that the second board selected is defective. a. Are \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) dependent events? Explain in words. b. Let not \(E_{1}\) be the event that the first board selected is not defective (the event \(E_{1}^{C}\) ). What is \(P\left(\right.\) not \(\left.E_{1}\right)\) ? c. How do the two probabilities \(P\left(E_{2} \mid E_{1}\right)\) and \(P\left(E_{2} \mid\right.\) not \(\left.E_{1}\right)\) compare? d. Based on your answer to Part (c), would it be reasonable to view \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) as approximately independent?

The following case study was reported in the article "Parking Tickets and Missing Women," which appeared in an early edition of the book Statistics: A Guide to the \(U n\) known. In a Swedish trial on a charge of overtime parking, a police officer testified that he had noted the position of the two air valves on the tires of a parked car: To the closest hour, one was at the one o'clock position and the other was at the six o'clock position. After the allowable time for parking in that zone had passed, the policeman returned, noted that the valves were in the same position, and ticketed the car. The owner of the car claimed that he had left the parking place in time and had returned later. The valves just happened by chance to be in the same positions. An "expert" witness computed the probability of this occurring as \((1 / 12)(1 / 12)=1 / 44\). a. What reasoning did the expert use to arrive at the probability of \(1 / 44\) ? b. Can you spot the error in the reasoning that leads to the stated probability of \(1 / 44\) ? What effect does this error have on the probability of occurrence? Do you think that \(1 / 44\) is larger or smaller than the correct probability of occurrence?

A Gallup survey of 2002 adults found that \(46 \%\) of women and \(37 \%\) of men experience pain daily (San Luis Obispo Tribune, April 6, 2000). Suppose that this information is representative of U.S. adults. If a U.S. adult is selected at random, are the events selected adult is male and selected adult experiences pain daily independent or dependent? Explain.

A library has five copies of a certain textbook on reserve of which two copies ( 1 and 2) are first printings and the other three \((3,4\), and 5 ) are second printings. A student examines these books in random order, stopping only when a second printing has been selected. a. Display the possible outcomes in a tree diagram. b. What outcomes are contained in the event \(A\), that exactly one book is examined before the chance experiment terminates? c. What outcomes are contained in the event \(C\), that the chance experiment terminates with the examination of book \(5 ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free