Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

'The article "Reduction in Soluble Protein and Chlorophyll Contents in a Few Plants as Indicators of Automobile Exhaust Pollution" (International Journal of Environmental Studies [1983]: \(239-244\) ) reported the following data on \(x=\) distance from a highway (in meters) and \(y=\) lead content of soil at that distance (in parts per million): a. Use a statistical computer package to construct scatterplots of \(y\) versus \(x, y\) versus \(\log (x), \log (y)\) versus \(\log (x)\) and \(\frac{1}{y}\) versus \(\frac{1}{x}\). b. Which transformation considered in Part (a) does the best job of producing an approximately linear relationship? Use the selected transformation to predict lead content when distance is \(25 \mathrm{~m}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
After constructing the scatterplots and assessing the linearity of the relationships, best transformation will be identified. Using the equation of the best fit line associated with it, the lead content in the soil when the distance from the highway is 25 meters will be predicted.

Step by step solution

01

Construct the scatterplots

Using a statistical computer package, construct the 4 scatterplots. The scatterplots will be \(y\) versus \(x\), \(y\) versus \(\log (x)\), \(\log (y)\) versus \(\log (x)\) and \(\frac{1}{y}\) versus \(\frac{1}{x}\). This will give a visual representation of the relationship between distance from the highway and the lead content of the soil.
02

Determine the most linear relationship

Analysis of the 4 scatterplots created in step 1 is done to visually determine which transformation gives the most linear relationship between \(x\) and \(y\). This can be done by looking at the 'spread' of points from any determined line of best fit - the more closely the points lie to the line, the more linear the relationship.
03

Prediction using the best transformation

Once the best transformation has been identified, it is then used to predict the lead content in soil when the distance from the highway is 25 meters. This can be done by plugging 25 into the equation of the best fit line related to the optimal transformation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "Postmortem Changes in Strength of Gastropod Shells" (Paleobiology [1992]: \(367-377\) ) included scatterplots of data on \(x=\) shell height (in centimeters) and \(y=\) breaking strength (in newtons) for a sample of \(n=38\) hermit crab shells. The least-squares line was \(\hat{y}=-275.1+244.9 x\) a. What are the slope and the intercept of this line? b. When shell height increases by \(1 \mathrm{~cm}\), by how much does breaking strength tend to change? c. What breaking strength would you predict when shell height is \(2 \mathrm{~cm} ?\) d. Does this approximate linear relationship appear to hold for shell heights as small as \(1 \mathrm{~cm} ?\) Explain.

An auction house released a list of 25 recently sold paintings. Eight artists were represented in these sales. The sale price of each painting appears on the list. Would the correlation coefficient be an appropriate way to summarize the relationship between artist \((x)\) and sale price (y)? Why or why not?

Explain why it can be dangerous to use the leastsquares line to obtain predictions for \(x\) values that are substantially larger or smaller than those contained in the sample.

The sample correlation coefficient between annual raises and teaching evaluations for a sample of \(n=353\) college faculty was found to be \(r=.11\) ("Determination of Faculty Pay: An Agency Theory Perspective," Academy of Management Joumal [1992]: 921-955). a. Interpret this value. b. If a straight line were fit to the data using least squares, what proportion of variation in raises could be attributed to the approximate linear relationship between raises and evaluations?

Each individual in a sample was asked to indicate on a quantitative scale how willing he or she was to spend money on the environment and also how strongly he or she believed in God ("Religion and Attitudes Toward the Environment," Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion [1993]: \(19-28\) ). The resulting value of the sample correlation coefficient was \(r=-.085 .\) Would you agree with the stated conclusion that stronger support for environmental spending is associated with a weaker degree of belief in God? Explain your reasoning.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free