Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The article "The Epiphytic Lichen Hypogymnia physodes as a Bioindicator of Atmospheric Nitrogen and Sulphur Deposition in Norway" (Environmental Monitoring and Assessment [1993]: \(27-47\) ) gives the following data (read from a graph in the paper) on \(x=\mathrm{NO}_{3}\) wet deposition (in grams per cubic meter) and \(y=\) lichen (\% dry weight): a. What is the equation of the least-squares regression line? \(\quad \hat{y}=0.3651+0.9668 \mathrm{x}\) b. Predict lichen dry weight percentage for an \(\mathrm{NO}_{3}\) depo sition of \(0.5 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The predicted lichen dry weight percentage for an \(NO_{3}\) deposition of \(0.5 g/m^{3}\) is approximately 0.8485 or 84.85%.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the regression line equation

The equation of the least squares regression line is already given in the problem as \(\hat{y}=0.3651+0.9668 x\), where \(x\) is the \(NO_{3}\) deposition and \(\hat{y}\) is the predicted lichen dry weight percentage. In this equation, 0.3651 is the y-intercept and 0.9668 is the slope of the line.
02

Plug in the given \(NO_{3}\) deposition

In order to predict the lichen dry weight percentage for an \(NO_{3}\) deposition of \(0.5 g/m^{3}\), we substitute \(x = 0.5\) into the regression equation. The calculated prediction \( \hat{y} = 0.3651+0.9668*0.5\)
03

Calculate the predicted lichen dry weight percentage

After substitution, we calculate the resulting mathematical expression to find the predicted lichen dry weight percentage, which comes out to be \( \hat{y} = 0.3651+0.4834 = 0.8485\). This value represents the predicted lichen dry weight percentage for an \(NO_{3}\) deposition of \(0.5 g/m^{3}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Least Squares Regression Line
The least squares regression line is a foundational tool in statistical analysis, providing a way to model the relationship between two variables. When data is scattered on a graph, this line seeks to summarize the ongoing trend by minimizing the sum of the squares of the vertical distances (errors) between the observed values and the line itself.

Imagine plotting points on a graph representing various levels of atmospheric nitrogen deposition and corresponding lichen dry weight percentages. The least squares regression line will be drawn so that the total area of the squares formed from the line to these points is as small as possible. In our exercise, the given equation \(\hat{y}=0.3651+0.9668x\) represents this best-fit line, where \(\hat{y}\) predicts the lichen dry weight percentage from any given \(NO_3\) deposition level. Here, 0.3651 is where the line intersects the Y-axis (y-intercept) and indicates the expected percentage of lichen dry weight when there is no nitrogen deposition. The slope 0.9668 signifies how much the lichen percentage increases for each gram of nitrogen deposition per cubic meter.
Predictive Analysis
Predictive analysis involves using historical data and statistical algorithms to forecast future events. In our exercise, the predictive analysis is conducted by utilizing the least squares regression line to estimate unobserved lichen dry weight percentages based on specific \(NO_3\) deposition levels. The regression line equation we have describes the best-guess relationship between the \(NO_3\) deposition and lichen dry weight percentage.

Using the equation, one can input any \(NO_3\) value and predict the corresponding lichen dry weight percentage. It's like having a crystal ball that provides scientifically backed estimates, as long as the relationship between variables remains consistent. For instance, with an \(NO_3\) deposition of 0.5 g/m³, we forecast the lichen percentage to be approximately 0.8485%. Such predictions can be critical for environmental monitoring and assessing the impact of atmospheric pollution on ecosystems.
Statistical Data Interpretation
Statistical data interpretation is the process of examining and making meaningful conclusions from data. It enables us to decipher the underlying patterns and relationships between data points. In the context of our exercise, statistical interpretation would involve understanding how lichen dry weight percentage responds or relates to varying levels of \(NO_3\) wet deposition in the environment.

By analyzing the slope and intercept of our regression line, we can comprehend not only how much lichen dry weight is expected to change with an increase in \(NO_3\) deposition but also the initial status of lichen health in the absence of \(NO_3\). In real-world scenarios, this type of analysis can inform policies and practices for environmental protection. Furthermore, by exploring the strength of the line's slope or the correlation coefficient, one can investigate the strength and direction of the relationship between these variables, often key to decision-making in environmental management and conservation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following data on \(x=\) score on a measure of test anxiety and \(y=\) exam score for a sample of \(n=9\) students are consistent with summary quantities given in the paper "Effects of Humor on Test Anxiety and Performance" (Psychological Reports [1999]: 1203-1212): $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrr} x & 23 & 14 & 14 & 0 & 17 & 20 & 20 & 15 & 21 \\ y & 43 & 59 & 48 & 77 & 50 & 52 & 46 & 51 & 51 \end{array} $$ Higher values for \(x\) indicate higher levels of anxiety. a. Construct a scatterplot, and comment on the features of the plot. b. Does there appear to be a linear relationship between the two variables? How would you characterize the relationship? c. Compute the value of the correlation coefficient. Is the value of \(r\) consistent with your answer to Part (b)? d. Is it reasonable to conclude that test anxiety caused poor exam performance? Explain.

A sample of 548 ethnically diverse students from Massachusetts were followed over a 19 -month period from 1995 and 1997 in a study of the relationship between TV viewing and eating habits (Pediatrics [2003]: 1321- 1326). For each additional hour of television viewed per day, the number of fruit and vegetable servings per day was found to decrease on average by \(0.14\) serving. a. For this study, what is the dependent variable? What is the predictor variable? b. Would the least-squares line for predicting number of servings of fruits and vegetables using number of hours spent watching TV as a predictor have a positive or negative slope? Explain.

The paper "Postmortem Changes in Strength of Gastropod Shells" (Paleobiology [1992]: \(367-377\) ) included scatterplots of data on \(x=\) shell height (in centimeters) and \(y=\) breaking strength (in newtons) for a sample of \(n=38\) hermit crab shells. The least-squares line was \(\hat{y}=-275.1+244.9 x\) a. What are the slope and the intercept of this line? b. When shell height increases by \(1 \mathrm{~cm}\), by how much does breaking strength tend to change? c. What breaking strength would you predict when shell height is \(2 \mathrm{~cm} ?\) d. Does this approximate linear relationship appear to hold for shell heights as small as \(1 \mathrm{~cm} ?\) Explain.

Each individual in a sample was asked to indicate on a quantitative scale how willing he or she was to spend money on the environment and also how strongly he or she believed in God ("Religion and Attitudes Toward the Environment," Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion [1993]: \(19-28\) ). The resulting value of the sample correlation coefficient was \(r=-.085 .\) Would you agree with the stated conclusion that stronger support for environmental spending is associated with a weaker degree of belief in God? Explain your reasoning.

The accompanying data represent \(x=\) the amount of catalyst added to accelerate a chemical reaction and \(y=\) the resulting reaction time: $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrr} x & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\ y & 49 & 46 & 41 & 34 & 25 \end{array} $$ a. Calculate \(r\). Does the value of \(r\) suggest a strong linear relationship? b. Construct a scatterplot. From the plot, does the word linear really provide the most effective description of the relationship between \(x\) and \(y\) ? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free