Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Both \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) are used to assess the fit of a line. a. Is it possible that both \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) could be large for a bivariate data set? Explain. (A picture might be helpful.) b. Is it possible that a bivariate data set could yield values of \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) that are both small? Explain. (Again, a picture might be helpful.) c. Explain why it is desirable to have \(r^{2}\) large and \(s_{e}\) small if the relationship between two variables \(x\) and \(y\) is to be described using a straight line.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, both \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) could be large for a bivariate data set if there are outliers. Also, \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) can both be small if data points are close to the line but the line has a poor slope. It is desirable to have a large \(r^{2}\) and small \(s_{e}\) for a statistical model that accurately predicts the dependent variable.

Step by step solution

01

Scenario Analysis for large \(r^{2}\) and large \(s_{e}\)

Yes, it is possible that both \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) could be large for a bivariate data set. While \(r^{2}\) represents the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable(s), \(s_{e}\) is a measure of the differences between the predicted value and what is observed. A large \(r^{2}\) value signifies that there is a lot of variability that can be accounted for by the independent variable(s) in the model. However, a large standard error (\(s_{e}\)) would indicate that the observed values deviate significantly from the line produced by the model. This scenario could occur when there are outliers in the data.
02

Scenario Analysis for small \(r^{2}\) and small \(s_{e}\)

Also, it's possible to have a situation where a bivariate data set could yield values of \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) that are both small. A small \(r^{2}\) means that the predictor (independent variables) does not explain the variability in the output (dependent variable) well. A small \(s_{e}\) indicates that the difference between observed and predicted values is small. This could happen if the data points are close to the line, but the line does not have a good slope (possibly nearly horizontal) and hence does not provide a good fit.
03

Desirability of large \(r^{2}\) and small \(s_{e}\)

It is desirable to have the \(r^{2}\) large and \(s_{e}\) small when describing a relationship between two variables using a straight line. A large \(r^{2}\) implies that the independent variable(s) explain a large proportion of the variance in the dependent variable. A small \(s_{e}\) means the residuals (the differences between the observed and predicted values) are small, implying a good fit of the model. The combination indicates a good statistical model that accurately predicts the dependent variable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "The Epiphytic Lichen Hypogymnia physodes as a Bioindicator of Atmospheric Nitrogen and Sulphur Deposition in Norway" (Environmental Monitoring and Assessment [1993]: \(27-47\) ) gives the following data (read from a graph in the paper) on \(x=\mathrm{NO}_{3}\) wet deposition (in grams per cubic meter) and \(y=\) lichen (\% dry weight): a. What is the equation of the least-squares regression line? \(\quad \hat{y}=0.3651+0.9668 \mathrm{x}\) b. Predict lichen dry weight percentage for an \(\mathrm{NO}_{3}\) depo sition of \(0.5 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\).

The sample correlation coefficient between annual raises and teaching evaluations for a sample of \(n=353\) college faculty was found to be \(r=.11\) ("Determination of Faculty Pay: An Agency Theory Perspective," Academy of Management Joumal [1992]: 921-955). a. Interpret this value. b. If a straight line were fit to the data using least squares, what proportion of variation in raises could be attributed to the approximate linear relationship between raises and evaluations?

A sample of automobiles traversing a certain stretch of highway is selected. Each one travels at roughly a constant rate of speed, although speed does vary from auto to auto. Let \(x=\) speed and \(y=\) time needed to traverse this segment of highway. Would the sample correlation coefficient be closest to \(.9, .3,-.3\), or \(-.9 ?\) Explain.

The accompanying data resulted from an experiment in which weld diameter \(x\) and shear strength \(y\) (in pounds) were determined for five different spot welds on steel. A scatterplot shows a pronounced linear pattern. With \(\sum(x-\bar{x})=1000\) and \(\sum(x-\bar{x})(y-\bar{y})=8577\), the least-squares line is \(\hat{y}=-936.22+8.577 x\). \(\begin{array}{llllll}x & 200.1 & 210.1 & 220.1 & 230.1 & 240.0\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{llllll}y & 813.7 & 785.3 & 960.4 & 1118.0 & 1076.2\end{array}\) a. Because \(1 \mathrm{lb}=0.4536 \mathrm{~kg}\), strength observations can be re-expressed in kilograms through multiplication by this conversion factor: new \(y=0.4536(\) old \(y) .\) What is the equation of the least-squares line when \(y\) is expressed in kilograms? b. More generally, suppose that each \(y\) value in a data set consisting of \(n(x, y)\) pairs is multiplied by a conversion factor \(c\) (which changes the units of measurement for \(y\) ). What effect does this have on the slope \(b\) (i.e., how does the new value of \(b\) compare to the value before conversion), on the intercept \(a\), and on the equation of the least-squares line? Verify your conjectures by using the given formulas for \(b\) and \(a\). (Hint: Replace \(y\) with \(c y\), and see what happens \- and remember, this conversion will affect \(\bar{y} .\) )

'The article "Reduction in Soluble Protein and Chlorophyll Contents in a Few Plants as Indicators of Automobile Exhaust Pollution" (International Journal of Environmental Studies [1983]: \(239-244\) ) reported the following data on \(x=\) distance from a highway (in meters) and \(y=\) lead content of soil at that distance (in parts per million): a. Use a statistical computer package to construct scatterplots of \(y\) versus \(x, y\) versus \(\log (x), \log (y)\) versus \(\log (x)\) and \(\frac{1}{y}\) versus \(\frac{1}{x}\). b. Which transformation considered in Part (a) does the best job of producing an approximately linear relationship? Use the selected transformation to predict lead content when distance is \(25 \mathrm{~m}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free