Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain why the slope \(b\) of the least-squares line always has the same sign (positive or negative) as does the sample correlation coefficient \(r\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sign of the slope \(b\) of the least-squares line is always the same as the sign of the sample correlation coefficient \(r\) because both measure the direction of the linear relationship between two variables. A positive sign indicates y generally increases as x increases, while a negative sign indicates y generally decreases as x increases.

Step by step solution

01

- Definition of Correlation Coefficient

The correlation coefficient (\(r\)) measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. The value of the correlation coefficient varies between -1 and 1, where -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship, 1 a perfect positive linear relationship, and 0 no linear relationship. The sign of the correlation coefficient indicates the direction of the relationship.
02

- Explanation of the Least-Squares Line

The least-squares line, also known as the regression line, represents the best-fit line that minimizes the sum of the squared differences (or errors) between the observed and predicted values. The slope of this line, denoted here as \(b\), will be positive if, in general, y increases as x increases and negative if y decreases as x increases.
03

- Relation Between the Signs of b and r

Since both the correlation coefficient and the slope of the least-squares line indicate the direction of a linear relationship, their signs will always be the same. If the correlation coefficient is positive, indicating a positive linear relationship, the slope of the least-squares line will also be positive. Conversely, if the correlation coefficient is negative, indicating a negative linear relationship, the slope of the least-squares line will also be negative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The sales manager of a large company selected a random sample of \(n=10\) salespeople and determined for each one the values of \(x=\) years of sales experience and \(y=\) annual sales (in thousands of dollars). A scatterplot of the resulting \((x, y)\) pairs showed a marked linear pattern. a. Suppose that the sample correlation coefficient is \(r=\) \(.75\) and that the average annual sales is \(\bar{y}=100\). If a particular salesperson is 2 standard deviations above the mean in terms of experience, what would you predict for that person's annual sales? b. If a particular person whose sales experience is \(1.5\) standard deviations below the average experience is predicted to have an annual sales value that is 1 standard deviation below the average annual sales, what is the value of \(r\) ?

Draw two scatterplots, one for which \(r=1\) and a second for which \(r=-1\).

Is the following statement correct? Explain why or why not. A correlation coefficient of 0 implies that no relationship exists between the two variables under study.

The article "Examined Life: What Stanley H. Kaplan Taught Us About the SAT" (The New Yorker [December 17,2001\(]: 86-92\) ) included a summary of findings regarding the use of SAT I scores, SAT II scores, and high school grade point average (GPA) to predict first-year college GPA. The article states that "among these, SAT II scores are the best predictor, explaining 16 percent of the variance in first-year college grades. GPA was second at \(15.4\) percent, and SAT I was last at \(13.3\) percent." a. If the data from this study were used to fit a leastsquares line with \(y=\) first-year college GPA and \(x=\) high school GPA, what would the value of \(r^{2}\) have been? b. The article stated that SAT II was the best predictor of first-year college grades. Do you think that predictions based on a least-squares line with \(y=\) first-year college GPA and \(x=\) SAT II score would have been very accurate? Explain why or why not.

The article "The Epiphytic Lichen Hypogymnia physodes as a Bioindicator of Atmospheric Nitrogen and Sulphur Deposition in Norway" (Environmental Monitoring and Assessment [1993]: \(27-47\) ) gives the following data (read from a graph in the paper) on \(x=\mathrm{NO}_{3}\) wet deposition (in grams per cubic meter) and \(y=\) lichen (\% dry weight): a. What is the equation of the least-squares regression line? \(\quad \hat{y}=0.3651+0.9668 \mathrm{x}\) b. Predict lichen dry weight percentage for an \(\mathrm{NO}_{3}\) depo sition of \(0.5 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free