Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

An auction house released a list of 25 recently sold paintings. Eight artists were represented in these sales. The sale price of each painting appears on the list. Would the correlation coefficient be an appropriate way to summarize the relationship between artist \((x)\) and sale price (y)? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, a correlation coefficient would not be an appropriate method to summarize the relationship between artist (x) and sale price (y) because a correlation coefficient measures the relationship between two numerical variables, not between a categorical and a numerical variable.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Variables

In this case, the two variables are artist (x) and sale price (y). Artist is a categorical variable as it represents different categories of painters. Sale price is a numerical variable as it represents a quantifiable entity that can be measured.
02

Evaluating the applicability of Correlation Coefficient

Correlation coefficient is used to summarize the relationship between two numerical variables. Therefore, using it to summarize the relationship between a categorical and a numerical variable like in this case, would not be appropriate. It cannot measure the influence of a categorical variable (artist) on a numerical variable (sale price). A more appropriate tool could be a method of grouping and comparing averages, such as Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).
03

Conclusion

Since the correlation coefficient is not an appropriate method to summarize the relationship between the artist (categorical) and the sale price (numerical), we conclude that other statistical methods, like ANOVA, may provide a more accurate representation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Categorical vs Numerical Variables
When diving into data analysis, one of the fundamental distinctions we encounter is between categorical and numerical variables. Understanding this distinction is crucial for choosing the correct statistical tools for analysis.

Categorical variables represent types or groups, like brands of chocolate, colors, or in the case of our exercise, artists. They are often further divided into nominal (no natural order) and ordinal categories (a clear ordering is possible). On the other hand, numerical variables represent quantities that can be measured. They can usually be ordered or ranked and are divided into discrete (countable, e.g., number of paintings) and continuous (measurable, e.g., sale price) variables.

Choosing the right analysis depends on correctly identifying these variables. The correlation coefficient, for instance, requires two numerical variables to measure the strength and direction of their linear relationship. Hence, other techniques are sought when working with categorical and numerical variables together, such as the ANOVA.
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
When we have a categorical variable, such as the artist, and a numerical one, like the sale price, and we wish to understand if there’s a significant difference in the numerical variable across the categories, the Analysis of Variance, or ANOVA, is the preferred method.

ANOVA allows us to compare means across multiple groups and determine whether any of those means are statistically significantly different from each other. This method works by analyzing the variance within each group versus the variance between groups. It's like asking if the differences in prices we see for paintings can be attributed to different artists or if they're just random variation.

However, ANOVA assumes that the data is normally distributed and the variances across groups are roughly equal, known as homoscedasticity. If these assumptions are not met, the results may be invalid, and other methods or transformations of data might be necessary.
Data Analysis in Statistics
In the broad field of statistics, data analysis involves multiple steps and choices depending on the nature of the data and the question at hand. The process generally starts with descriptive statistics to summarize the data – providing a snapshot of its key features with tools such as means, medians, modes, ranges, and standard deviations.

Exploratory data analysis (EDA) is conducted to find patterns, anomalies, or relationships within the data. EDA can involve visual methods like creating charts or graphs, as well as more formal methods such as hypothesis testing, where ANOVA often comes into play.

Confirmatory data analysis (CDA) follows if we have specific hypotheses or models we want to validate. Techniques like regression analysis, time-series analysis, and others including ANOVA are used to confirm or disprove these hypotheses. Effective data analysis requires understanding the nature of the variables involved and choosing the most appropriate statistical methods to gather insights from the data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Cost-Effectiveness in Public Education" (Chance [1995]: \(38-41\) ) reported that for a regression of \(y=\) average SAT score on \(x=\) expenditure per pupil, based on data from \(n=44\) New Jersey school districts, \(a=766, b=0.015, r^{2}=.160\), and \(s_{e}=53.7\) a. One observation in the sample was \((9900,893)\). What average SAT score would you predict for this district, and what is the corresponding residual? b. Interpret the value of \(s_{e}\). c. How effectively do you think the least-squares line summarizes the relationship between \(x\) and \(y ?\) Explain your reasoning.

Explain why it can be dangerous to use the leastsquares line to obtain predictions for \(x\) values that are substantially larger or smaller than those contained in the sample.

The accompanying data represent \(x=\) the amount of catalyst added to accelerate a chemical reaction and \(y=\) the resulting reaction time: $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrr} x & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\ y & 49 & 46 & 41 & 34 & 25 \end{array} $$ a. Calculate \(r\). Does the value of \(r\) suggest a strong linear relationship? b. Construct a scatterplot. From the plot, does the word linear really provide the most effective description of the relationship between \(x\) and \(y\) ? Explain.

The data given in Example \(5.5\) on \(x=\) call-to-shock time (in minutes) and \(y=\) survival rate (percent) were used to compute the equation of the least- squares line, which was $$ \hat{y}=101.36-9.30 x $$ The newspaper article "FDA OKs Use of Home Defibrillators" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, November 13,2002 ) reported that "every minute spent waiting for paramedics to arrive with a defibrillator lowers the chance of survival by 10 percent." Is this statement consistent with the given least-squares line? Explain.

Anabolic steroid abuse has been increasing despite increased press reports of adverse medical and psychiatric consequences. In a recent study, medical researchers studied the potential for addiction to testosterone in hamsters (Neuroscience [2004]: \(971-981\) ). Hamsters were allowed to self-administer testosterone over a period of days, resulting in the death of some of the animals. The data below show the proportion of hamsters surviving versus the peak self-administration of testosterone \((\mu \mathrm{g})\). Fit a logistic regression equation and use the equation to predict the probability of survival for a hamster with a peak intake of \(40 \mu \mathrm{g} . \quad \ln \left(\frac{P}{1-p}\right)=4.589-0.0659 x ; 0.876\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free