Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A survey of affluent Americans (those with incomes of \(\$ 75,000\) or more) indicated that \(57 \%\) would rather have more time than more money (USA Today, January 29 , 2003). a. What condition on how the data were collected would make the generalization from the sample to the population of affluent Americans reasonable? b. Would it be reasonable to generalize from the sample to say that \(57 \%\) of all Americans would rather have more time than more money? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. A reasonable generalization from the sample to the population of affluent Americans can be made if the sample is representative and sufficiently large, provided that participants' responses were independent and the survey did not include any bias. b. It's not reasonable to generalize these findings to all Americans since the survey only sampled affluent Americans, which isn't representative of all income groups in the population. A stratified sample considering different income groups will be needed for such a generalization.

Step by step solution

01

Assess the Validity of Generalization

To make the generalization from the sample to the population of affluent Americans reasonable, the following conditions should be met: 1. The survey should be based on a random sample: That is the sample should be representative of the population (i.e., affluent Americans). 2. The sample size should be sufficiently large to reflect the overall attitudes of the affluent American population.3. The respondents' answers should be independent of each other.4. The survey design and its questions should not be biased.
02

Evaluate the Generalization to All Americans

It would not be reasonable to generalize from the sample to say that 57 % of all Americans would rather have more time than money. Here are the reasons: 1. The sampled group is a specific segment of the population (i.e., affluent Americans), whose responses might be influenced by unique factors related to their higher income level. It's not representative of all income groups.2. Unless the research specifically sampled and received responses from the other segments (non-affluent Americans) of the population, it would not be valid to extend these findings.3. To make such a generalization, a more comprehensive survey including participants from every segment of the population is needed. This means a stratified sample considering different income groups.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Random Sampling
Understanding random sampling is crucial for accurately conducting surveys and research. To illustrate, let's consider an exercise that involves surveying affluent Americans. A key to gaining insights from a survey is to utilize random sampling. This method ensures that every individual within the target population—affluent Americans with incomes over \(\$75,000\)—has an equal chance of being selected.

This equality is vital because it avoids selection bias, where certain members of the population may be chosen more frequently than others, potentially skewing the results. If only certain neighborhoods or social circles of affluent individuals are sampled, the survey outcomes might not reflect the general attitudes or opinions of the entire affluent population.

Why Random Sampling Matters

Random sampling is the bedrock upon which the credibility of survey results is built. In our exercise, if the survey results indicated that 57% of affluent Americans prefer more time over more money, this percentage is meaningful only if derived from a random sample. Otherwise, the results cannot be safely generalized to represent the entire group.
Survey Design
An effective survey design is a blueprint for obtaining accurate and relevant data. In the context of our exercise where a survey aims to understand the preferences of affluent Americans, the design includes the way in which questions are asked, the order of the questions, and how the survey is administered.

Unbiased and clearly phrased questions are vital to avoid leading responses in a specific direction. The design should also consider the medium—whether the survey is conducted online, in person, or by phone—as each method may influence the type of respondents and the quality of information collected.

Key Aspects of Survey Design

Major aspects to be mindful of include ensuring anonymity to encourage honest answers, using a logical sequence that flows from general to specific questions, and pre-testing the survey on a small sample to iron out any potential issues before full deployment.
Statistical Validity
The cornerstone of well-conducted research, statistical validity, refers to the degree to which the conclusions drawn from a study are accurate and reliable. Our exercise highlights a conclusion about affluent Americans' preferences for time over money. For this conclusion to hold water statistically, the survey methods used must produce a true representation of the population without significant error.

Factors affecting validity include sample size, measurement techniques, and sampling methods. In the context of surveying affluent Americans, statistical validity would suggest that the 57% preference rate accurately reflects the wider population's stance, assuming that other variables such as social desirability or response biases are controlled for.

Ensuring Validity

The application of random sampling and meticulous survey design contributes greatly to achieving statistical validity. Moreover, the researcher should conduct appropriate statistical tests to evaluate the degree of potential error and confidence in the results.
Representative Sample
A representative sample acts as a miniature version of the population from which it's drawn, embodying its characteristics and diversity. If the exercise's goal is to generalize about all affluent Americans based on the survey, it's crucial that the sample accurately mirrors this group in terms of geographic distribution, age, gender, and other relevant demographics.

A sample that's skewed towards a particular segment—even within an affluent bracket—compromises the applicability of the results to the larger group. Hence, the sample should proportionately capture the variability in the affluent population, ensuring that the study's findings are applicable to all affluent Americans, not just a subset.

Characteristics of a Representative Sample

For instance, if affluent Americans from only urban areas are surveyed, the results wouldn't represent those living in rural settings. Therefore, proper sampling techniques and careful consideration of demographics are essential for a representative sample. Without it, any generalization to the population would be unfounded and potentially misleading.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Americans are 'Getting the Wrong Idea' on Alcohol and Health" (Associated Press, April 19,2005 ) reported that observational studies in recent years that have concluded that moderate drinking is associated with a reduction in the risk of heart disease may be misleading. The article refers to a study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that showed that moderate drinkers, as a group, tended to be better educated, wealthier, and more active than nondrinkers. Explain why the existence of these potentially confounding factors prevent drawing the conclusion that moderate drinking is the cause of reduced risk of heart disease.

"More than half of California's doctors say they are so frustrated with managed care they will quit, retire early, or leave the state within three years." This conclusion from an article titled "Doctors Feeling Pessimistic, Study Finds" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, July 15,2001 ) was based on a mail survey conducted by the California Medical Association. Surveys were mailed to 19,000 California doctors, and 2000 completed surveys were returned. Describe any concerns you have regarding the conclusion drawn.

Pismo Beach, California, has an annual clam festival that includes a clam chowder contest. Judges rate clam chowders from local restaurants, and the judging is done in such a way that the judges are not aware of which chowder is from which restaurant. One year, much to the dismay of the seafood restaurants on the waterfront, Denny's chowder was declared the winner! (When asked what the ingredients were, the cook at Denny's said he wasn't sure - he just had to add the right amount of nondairy creamer to the soup stock that he got from Denny's distribution center!) a. Do you think that Denny's chowder would have won the contest if the judging had not been "blind"? Explain. b. Although this was not an experiment, your answer to Part (a) helps to explain why those measuring the response in an experiment are often blinded. Using your answer in Part (a), explain why experiments are often blinded in this way.

The article "Doctor Dogs Diagnose Cancer by Sniffing It Out" (Knight Ridder Newspapers, January 9, 2006 ) reports the results of an experiment described in the journal Integrative Cancer Therapies. In this experiment, dogs were trained to distinguish between people with breast and lung cancer and people without cancer by sniffing exhaled breath. Dogs were trained to lay down if they detected cancer in a breath sample. After training, dogs' ability to detect cancer was tested using breath samples from people whose breath had not been used in training the dogs. The paper states "The researchers blinded both the dog handlers and the experimental observers to the identity of the breath samples." Explain why this blinding is an important aspect of the design of this experiment.

An article titled "Guard Your Kids Against Allergies: Get Them a Pet" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, August 28 , 2002) described a study that led researchers to conclude that "babies raised with two or more animals were about half as likely to have allergies by the time they turned six." a. Do you think this study was an observational study or an experiment? Explain. b. Describe a potential confounding variable that illustrates why it is unreasonable to conclude that being raised with two or more animals is the cause of the observed lower allergy rate.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free