Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A 1993 study showed that college students temporarily gained up to 9 IQ points after listening to a Mozart piano sonata. This conclusion, dubbed the Mozart effect, has since been criticized by a number of researchers who have been unable to confirm the result in similar studies. Suppose that you wanted to see whether there is a Mozart effect for students at your school. a. Describe how you might design an experiment for this purpose. b. Does your experimental design include direct control of any extraneous variables? Explain. c. Does your experimental design use blocking? Explain why you did or did not include blocking in your design. d. What role does randomization play in your design?

Short Answer

Expert verified
An experiment can be designed by selecting a group of students and dividing them into two groups where one listens to Mozart's music. Direct control of extraneous variables is included by keeping variables like testing time and environment constant. Blocking isn't used as it's unnecessary in this case. Randomization plays a key role in preventing bias.

Step by step solution

01

Experiment Design

To design an experiment, start by defining a clear hypothesis to test if listening to a Mozart piano sonata has any effect on student's IQ. Then, select a representative sample of students from the school. Divide them into two groups randomly: a control group that will carry on their normal activities without any interference, and an experimental group that will listen to a Mozart piano sonata before taking an IQ test.
02

Direct Control of Extraneous Variables

The experiment design does include direct control of extraneous variables. An extraneous variable that could affect the IQ results, such as the time of day the test is taken or the environment in the testing room, are kept constant for all participants to avoid biased results. All students take the test under the same condition at the same time of day.
03

Use of Blocking

The experimental design does not include blocking. This is because there is only one treatment being tested (listening to Mozart) and it would be sufficient to control for extraneous variables without requiring to block the participants into subgroups based on any characteristic, such as sex, age group etc.
04

Role of Randomization

Randomization plays a role in this design by preventing bias in the selection of participants and allocation of treatments. Students are randomly selected from different classes to ensure no particular group (like high achievers) is overrepresented. Assigning students randomly to control and treatment groups also ensures that the effects measured can be attributed to the treatment (listening to Mozart's sonata) and not to some other uncontrolled variable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Experiment Design in Statistics
When designing an experiment in statistics, the main goal is to structure the process in such a way that it highlights the relationship between the independent variable, which is manipulated, and the dependent variable, the outcome being studied. It is crucial to start with a clearly defined hypothesis. For example, if you're studying the so-called Mozart effect, your hypothesis might be that listening to a Mozart piano sonata enhances a student's IQ.

Once the hypothesis is set, a representative sample needs to be selected, which can provide insights that are applicable to the larger population. In the case of the Mozart effect, that would be a cross-section of students from the school. Then, these students ought to be divided into two groups: the control group, who do not listen to the sonata, and the experimental group, who do. This allows for a comparison to determine the effect of the independent variable.

The experimenter must also decide on the treatment procedures. For students, this would entail when and how they listen to the sonata before taking an IQ test. Ensuring the credibility of the outcome necessitates a meticulous approach to every aspect of the experiment's design.
Control of Extraneous Variables
The validity of an experimental outcome hinges on the control of extraneous variables—those which are not the independent variable being studied but could influence the results. In the context of determining the Mozart effect, any factor other than the sonata itself that could impact IQ scores qualifies as an extraneous variable.

It is vital to control for such factors to mitigate the risk of a false association between the treatment and the outcome. You would ensure that all participants, regardless of the group they are in, take the IQ test in the same environment and at the same time of day. By maintaining consistency in these conditions, you are effectively neutralizing the influence of potential confounders. Sometimes, it is impossible to control all extraneous variables, and this is where randomization becomes a key component.
Randomization in Experiments
Randomization is a cornerstone principle in experimental design that involves assigning subjects or test units to different conditions or treatments based on chance rather than choice. This method is essential in ensuring that the experiment is as fair and unbiased as possible.

By randomizing the assignment of students to either the control group or the experimental group, you reduce the impact of extraneous variables that have not been controlled directly. This randomization process ensures each student has an equal chance of being allocated to any condition, thus balancing out known and unknown factors that could affect the results across groups. Such a method also aids in the creation of statistically valid inferences, allowing for the more reliable generalization of the results to the larger population.
Blocking in Experimental Design
Blocking is an experimental design technique used to group subjects with similar attributes together, and then performing the experiment within these blocks. By doing so, it aims to remove sources of variability related to those attributes.

However, in our exercise concerning the Mozart effect, blocking was deemed unnecessary since only one treatment (listening to Mozart) was tested, and the extraneous variables were considered controllable. In cases where there are more treatments or the influence of specific subject characteristics (like age or previous knowledge of music) is suspected to interact with the treatment, blocking would be integral to the experimental design. It would allow for more precise estimates of the treatment effect by controlling the within-block variation, which could be substantial.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Does living in the South cause high blood pressure? Data from a group of 6278 whites and blacks questioned in the Third National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey between 1988 and 1994 (see CNN.com web site article of January 6,2000 , titled "High Blood Pressure Greater Risk in U.S. South, Study Says") indicates that a greater percentage of Southerners have high blood pressure than do people in any other region of the United States. This difference in rate of high blood pressure was found in every ethnic group, gender, and age category studied. List at least two possible reasons we cannot conclude that living in the South causes high blood pressure.

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania suggest that a nasal spray derived from pheromones (chemicals emitted by animals when they are trying to attract a mate) may be beneficial in relieving symptoms of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) (Los Angeles Times, January 17 , 2003 ). a. Describe how you might design an experiment using 100 female volunteers who suffer from PMS to determine whether the nasal spray reduces PMS symptoms. b. Does your design from Part (a) include a placebo treatment? Why or why not? c. Does your design from Part (a) involve blinding? Is it single-blind or double-blind? Explain.

The article "Heavy Drinking and Problems among Wine Drinkers" (Journal of Studies on Alcohol [1999]: 467-471) investigates whether wine drinkers tend to drink less excessively than those who drink beer and spirits. A sample of Canadians, stratified by province of residence and other socioeconomic factors, was selected. a. Why might stratification by province be a good thing? b. List two socioeconomic factors that would be appropriate to use for stratification. Explain how each factor would relate to the consumption of alcohol in general and of wine in particular.

Is status related to a student's understanding of science? The article "From Here to Equity: The Influence of Status on Student Access to and Understanding of Science" (Culture and Comparative Studies [1999]: \(577-\) 602) described a study on the effect of group discussions on learning biology concepts. An analysis of the relationship between status and "rate of talk" (the number of ontask speech acts per minute) during group work included gender as a blocking variable. Do you think that gender is a useful blocking variable? Explain.

Suppose that you were asked to help design a survey of adult city residents in order to estimate the proportion that would support a sales tax increase. The plan is to use a stratified random sample, and three stratification schemes have been proposed. Scheme 1: Stratify adult residents into four strata based on the first letter of their last name (A-G, \(\mathrm{H}-\mathrm{N}, \mathrm{O}-\mathrm{T}, \mathrm{U}-\mathrm{Z})\) Scheme 2: Stratify adult residents into three strata: college students, nonstudents who work full time, nonstudents who do not work full time. Scheme 3: Stratify adult residents into five strata by randomly assigning residents into one of the five strata. Which of the three stratification schemes would be best in this situation? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free