Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The article "The Soundtrack of Recklessness: Musical Preferences and Reckless Behavior Among Adolescents" (Journal of Adolescent Research [1992]: \(313-331\) ) described a study whose purpose was to determine whether adolescents who preferred certain types of music reported higher rates of reckless behaviors, such as speeding, drug use, shoplifting, and unprotected sex. Independently chosen random samples were selected from each of four groups of students with different musical preferences at a large high school: (1) acoustic/pop, (2) mainstream rock, $$\begin{array}{ccccccccc} \text { Type of Box } & & & {\text { Compression Strength (Ib) }} & & & & {\text { Sample Mean }} & {\text { Sample SD }} \\ \hline 1 & 655.5 & 788.3 & 734.3 & 721.4 & 679.1 & 699.4 & 713.00 & 46.55 \\ 2 & 789.2 & 772.5 & 786.9 & 686.1 & 732.1 & 774.8 & 756.93 & 40.34 \\ 3 & 737.1 & 639.0 & 696.3 & 671.7 & 717.2 & 727.1 & 698.07 & 37.20 \\ 4 & 535.1 & 628.7 & 542.4 & 559.0 & 586.9 & 520.0 & 562.02 & 39.87 \\ & & & & & & & \overline{\bar{x}} =682.50 & \end{array}$$ (3) hard rock, and (4) heavy metal. Each student in these samples was asked how many times he or she had engaged in various reckless activities during the last year. The following table lists data and summary quantities on driving over \(80 \mathrm{mph}\) that is consistent with summary quantities given in the article (the sample sizes in the article were much larger, but for the purposes of this exercise, we use \(\left.n_{1}=n_{2}=n_{3}=n_{4}=20\right)\) $$\begin{array}{rrrr} \text { Acoustic/Pop } & \text { Mainstream Rock } & \text { Hard Rock } & \text { Heavy Metal } \\ \hline 2 & 3 & 3 & 4 \\ 3 & 2 & 4 & 3 \\ 4 & 1 & 3 & 4 \\ 1 & 2 & 1 & 3 \\ 3 & 3 & 2 & 3 \\ 3 & 4 & 1 & 3 \\ 3 & 3 & 4 & 3 \\ 3 & 2 & 2 & 3 \\ 2 & 4 & 2 & 2 \\ 2 & 4 & 2 & 4 \\ 1 & 4 & 3 & 4 \\ 3 & 4 & 3 & 5 \\ 2 & 2 & 4 & 4 \\ 2 & 3 & 3 & 5 \\ 2 & 2 & 3 & 3 \\ 3 & 2 & 2 & 4 \\ 2 & 2 & 3 & 5 \\ 2 & 3 & 4 & 4 \\ 3 & 1 & 2 & 2 \\ 4 & 3 & 4 & 3 \\ 20 & 20 & 20 & 20 \\ 2.50 & 2.70 & 2.75 & 3.55 \\ .827 & .979 & .967 & .887 \\ 6830 & 0584 & 0351 & 7868 \end{array}$$ Also, \(N=80\), grand total \(=230.0\), and \(\overline{\bar{x}}=230.0 / 80=\) 2.875. Carry out an \(F\) test to determine if these data provide convincing evidence that the true mean number of times driving over 80 mph varies with musical preference.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The short answer to the problem depends on the outcome of the F-test. If the P-value is less than 0.05, then we would reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence supporting that the true mean number of times driving over 80 mph varies with musical preference. If the P-value is greater than 0.05, then we would not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the true mean number of times driving over 80 mph varies with musical preference.

Step by step solution

01

Set Up the Hypothesis

Let's set up the hypothesis for this problem. The null hypothesis states that there is no difference among groups. In the context of this problem, the null hypothesis states that all the genre preferences have the same mean number of times driving over 80 mph. This can be written as: \(H_0 : \mu_1 = \mu_2 = \mu_3 = \mu_4\). The alternative hypothesis is that at least one group has a different mean, or \(H_a : \mu\)'s are not all equal.
02

Compute the Variations

Calculate the total variation, which is the sum of the variance of each individual score from the overall mean, \(\overline{\bar{x}}\). In our problem, the overall mean (grand mean) is already given as 2.875.\nCalculate the within-group variation which is the sum of the variance of each individual score from the mean of its respective group.\nCalculate the between-group variation which is the total variation minus the within group variation.
03

Compute the Degrees of Freedom

The degrees of freedom for total variation is \(N - 1 = 80 - 1 = 79\) (where N is the total sample size).\nThe degrees of freedom for within-group variation is equal to \(N – k = 80 – 4 = 76\) (where k is the number of groups).\nThe degrees of freedom for between-group variation is equal to \(k - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3\).
04

Compute the F statistic

Calculate the F statistic which is the ratio of variance between groups and variance within groups. This can be calculated using the formula: \(F = \) (Between-group variation/df\( _{between}\)) / (Within-group variation/df\(_{within}\))
05

Conclude the Study

Look up the P-value associated with observed value of F in a F-distribution table. If the P-value is less than the chosen significance level (usually 0.05), the null hypothesis that all the genre preferences have the same true mean is rejected, providing evidence that at least one group has a different mean. If the P-value is greater than the significance level, then it is not rejected, showing there's no convincing evidence that at least one group has a different mean.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The accompanying data resulted from a flammability study in which specimens of five different fabrics were tested to determine burn times. $$\begin{array}{lllllll} & \mathbf{1} & 17.8 & 16.2 & 15.9 & 15.5 & \\ & \mathbf{2} & 13.2 & 10.4 & 11.3 & & \\ \text { Fabric } & \mathbf{3} & 11.8 & 11.0 & 9.2 & 10.0 & \\ & \mathbf{4} & 16.5 & 15.3 & 14.1 & 15.0 & 13.9 \\ & \mathbf{5} & 13.9 & 10.8 & 12.8 & 11.7 & \end{array}$$ \(\begin{aligned} \mathrm{MSTr} &=23.67 \\ \mathrm{MSE} &=1.39 \\ F &=17.08 \\ P \text { -value } &=.000 \end{aligned}\) The accompanying output gives the T-K intervals as calculated by MINITAB. Identify significant differences and give the underscoring pattern. $$\begin{array}{lrrr} & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ 2 & 1.938 & & & \\ & 7.495 & & & \\ 3 & 3.278 & -1.645 & & \\ & 8.422 & 3.912 & & \\ 4 & 3.830 & -0.670 & -2.020 & \\ & 1.478 & -3.445 & -4.372 & 0.220 \\ 5 & 6.622 & 2.112 & 0.772 & 5.100 \end{array}$$

Samples of six different brands of diet or imitation margarine were analyzed to determine the level of physiologically active polyunsaturated fatty acids (PAPUFA, in percent), resulting in the data shown in the accompanying table. (The data are fictitious, but the sample means agree with data reported in Consumer Reports.) $$\begin{array}{llllll} \text { Imperial } & 14.1 & 13.6 & 14.4 & 14.3 & \\ \text { Parkay } & 12.8 & 12.5 & 13.4 & 13.0 & 12.3 \\ \text { Blue Bonnet } & 13.5 & 13.4 & 14.1 & 14.3 & \\ \text { Chiffon } & 13.2 & 12.7 & 12.6 & 13.9 & \\ \text { Mazola } & 16.8 & 17.2 & 16.4 & 17.3 & 18.0 \\ \text { Fleischmann's } & 18.1 & 17.2 & 18.7 & 18.4 & \end{array}$$ a. Test for differences among the true average PAPUFA percentages for the different brands. Use \(\alpha=.05\). b. Use the T-K procedure to compute \(95 \%\) simultaneous confidence intervals for all differences between means and interpret the resulting intervals.

High productivity and carbohydrate storage ability of the Jerusalem artichoke make it a promising agricultural crop. The article "Leaf Gas Exchange and Tuber Yield in Jerusalem Artichoke Cultivars" (Field Crops Research [1991]: \(241-252\) ) reported on various plant characteristics. Consider the accompanying data on chlorophyll concentration \(\left(\mathrm{gm} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\right)\) for four varieties of Jerusalem artichoke: $$\begin{array}{lccll} \text { Variety } & \text { BI } & \text { RO } & \text { WA } & \text { TO } \\\ \text { Sample mean } & .30 & .24 & .41 & .33 \end{array}$$ Suppose that the sample sizes were \(5,5,4\), and 6, respectively, and also that MSE \(=.0130 .\) Do the data suggest that true average chlorophyll concentration depends on the variety? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\).

The accompanying underscoring pattern appeared in the article "Effect of \(\mathrm{SO}_{2}\) on Transpiration, Chlorophyll Content, Growth, and Injury in Young Seedlings of Woody Angiosperms" ( \mathrm{\\{} C a n a d i a n ~ J o u r n a l ~ o f ~ F o r e s t ~ R e s e a r c h ~ [1980]: 78-81). Water loss of plants (Acer saccharinum) exposed to \(0,2,4,8\), and 16 hours of fumigation was recorded, and a multiple comparison procedure was used to detect differences among the mean water losses for the different fumigation durations. How would you interpret this pattern? $$\begin{array}{rrrrr} &\text { Duration of fumigation } &16 & 0 & 8 & 2 & 4 \\ &\text { Sample mean water loss } &27.57 & 28.23 & 30.21 & 31.16 & 36.21 \end{array}$$

The degree of success at mastering a skill often depends on the method used to learn the skill. The article "Effects of Occluded Vision and Imagery on Putting Golf Balls" (Perceptual and Motor Skills [1995]: \(179-186\) ) reported on a study involving the following four learning methods: (1) visual contact and imagery, (2) nonvisual contact and imagery, (3) visual contact, and (4) control. There were 20 subjects randomly assigned to each method. The following summary information on putting performance score was reported: $$\begin{array}{cccccc} \text { Method } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & \\ \hline \bar{x} & 16.30 & 15.25 & 12.05 & 9.30 & \overline{\bar{x}}=13.23 \\ s & 2.03 & 3.23 & 2.91 & 2.85 & \end{array}$$ a. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude the mean putting performance score is not the same for the four methods? b. Calculate the \(95 \%\) T-K intervals, and then use the underscoring procedure described in this section to identify significant differences among the learning methods.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free