Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Samples of six different brands of diet or imitation margarine were analyzed to determine the level of physiologically active polyunsaturated fatty acids (PAPUFA, in percent), resulting in the data shown in the accompanying table. (The data are fictitious, but the sample means agree with data reported in Consumer Reports.) $$\begin{array}{llllll} \text { Imperial } & 14.1 & 13.6 & 14.4 & 14.3 & \\ \text { Parkay } & 12.8 & 12.5 & 13.4 & 13.0 & 12.3 \\ \text { Blue Bonnet } & 13.5 & 13.4 & 14.1 & 14.3 & \\ \text { Chiffon } & 13.2 & 12.7 & 12.6 & 13.9 & \\ \text { Mazola } & 16.8 & 17.2 & 16.4 & 17.3 & 18.0 \\ \text { Fleischmann's } & 18.1 & 17.2 & 18.7 & 18.4 & \end{array}$$ a. Test for differences among the true average PAPUFA percentages for the different brands. Use \(\alpha=.05\). b. Use the T-K procedure to compute \(95 \%\) simultaneous confidence intervals for all differences between means and interpret the resulting intervals.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Using the ANOVA test, we can understand whether there is a difference in PAPUFA percentages among the different margarine brands or not. The Tukey-Kramer procedure will then provide us with simultaneous confidence intervals to understand these differences between every pair of means. The interpretation of these intervals helps us understand where significant differences occur.

Step by step solution

01

Perform ANOVA Test

For the ANOVA test, we calculate the within group sum of squares (WSS), between group sum of squares (BSS), and the total sum of squares (TSS). Then compute the degrees of freedom and mean sum of squares (MSS). Finally, calculate the F-value and P-value. If the P-value is less than \(\alpha = 0.05\), then reject the null hypothesis.
02

Analyze ANOVA result

Depending on the F-value and P-value from previous step, decide whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis 'All means are equal'. If P-value < \(\alpha\), reject the null hypothesis indicating that there are significant differences between the group means.
03

Calculate Tukey-Kramer Confidence Intervals

For paired comparison of means and the simultaneous confidence intervals, compute Tukey's HSD (Honest Significant Difference) value and calculate the upper and lower intervals by adding and subtracting HSD from the group mean differences to get the intervals.
04

Interpret Confidence Intervals

Depending on whether the interval contains 0 or not, we can interpret if there is a significant difference between the groups or not. If the interval contains 0, there is no significant difference. If not, there is a significant difference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Analysis
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are essential fats that our bodies cannot produce and thus, must be obtained from our diet. In nutrition studies, the analysis of PUFAs within products like margarine is critical to understand their health implications.

The analysis typically involves extracting the fats from food samples and using methods like gas chromatography to quantify the levels of PUFAs. The data for different brands in our exercise give various PAPUFA percentages, which reflect the product's quality and health benefits. These variations also pave the way for statistical comparison to identify if the differences in PUFA levels are significant or merely due to chance.
Tukey-Kramer Procedure
The Tukey-Kramer (T-K) procedure is a post-hoc analysis commonly used after an ANOVA test. It’s particularly useful when you want to perform multiple pairwise comparisons between group means without increasing the Type I error rate.

The T-K method controls the familywise error rate and is robust even when the sample sizes are unequal. It calculates the Honest Significant Difference (HSD), a value that determines the range within which the true mean difference between groups lies. By comparing this range to zero, researchers can ascertain whether the differences between each pair of group means are statistically significant or not.
Simultaneous Confidence Intervals
Simultaneous confidence intervals in the context of ANOVA and the T-K procedure are intervals within which we can expect the true differences between population means to fall, for all pairwise comparisons, with a certain degree of confidence. These intervals are 'simultaneous' because they provide a confidence level for multiple comparisons at once.

For instance, a 95% simultaneous confidence interval would mean we can be 95% confident that all calculated intervals contain the true differences between the corresponding population means. Hence, these intervals are pivotal in determining not just if groups differ, but also the extent and direction of those differences.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental concept in statistics that allows us to make inferences about populations based on sample data. In our exercise, the null hypothesis suggests that there is no difference among the true average PAPUFA percentages for different brands.

If the results from ANOVA show a P-value less than the chosen significance level (in this case, \( \alpha = 0.05 \)), we reject the null hypothesis, concluding that not all brand means are equal and at least one brand differs significantly from the others. Conversely, if the P-value is higher, we do not have sufficient evidence to say the brands differ regarding their PAPUFA content. This process is key to ensuring that any declared differences are not simply due to random variation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Employees of a certain state university system can choose from among four different health plans. Each plan differs somewhat from the others in terms of hospitalization coverage. Four samples of recently hospitalized individuals were selected, each sample consisting of people covered by a different health plan. The length of the hospital stay (number of days) was determined for each individual selected. a. What hypotheses would you test to decide whether average length of stay was related to health plan? (Note: Carefully define the population characteristics of interest.) b. If each sample consisted of eight individuals and the value of the ANOVA \(F\) statistic was \(F=4.37\), what conclusion would be appropriate for a test with \(\alpha=.01\) ? c. Answer the question posed in Part (b) if the \(F\) value given there resulted from sample sizes \(n_{1}=9, n_{2}=8\), \(n_{3}=7\), and \(n_{4}=8\).

It has been reported that varying work schedules can lead to a variety of health problems for workers. The article "Nutrient Intake in Day Workers and Shift Workers" (Work and Stress [1994]: 332-342) reported on blood glucose levels (mmol/L) for day-shift workers and workers on two different types of rotating shifts. The sample sizes were \(n_{1}=37\) for the day shift, \(n_{2}=34\) for the second shift, and \(n_{3}=25\) for the third shift. A single- factor ANOVA resulted in \(F=3.834\). At a significance level of .05, does true average blood glucose level appear to depend on the type of shift?

The article "Growth Response in Radish to Sequential and Simultaneous Exposures of \(\mathrm{NO}_{2}\) and \(\mathrm{SO}_{2} "(\) Environmental Pollution \([1984]: 303-325\) ) compared a control group (no exposure), a sequential exposure group (plants exposed to one pollutant followed by exposure to the second four weeks later), and a simultaneous-exposure group (plants exposed to both pollutants at the same time). The article states, "Sequential exposure to the two pollutants had no effect on growth compared to the control. Simultaneous exposure to the gases significantly reduced plant growth." Let \(\bar{x}_{1}, \bar{x}_{2}\), and \(\bar{x}_{3}\) represent the sample means for the control, sequential, and simultaneous groups, respectively. Suppose that \(\bar{x}_{1}>\bar{x}_{2}>\bar{x}_{3}\). Use the given information to construct a table where the sample means are listed in increasing order, with those that are judged not to be significantly different underscored. \(15.30\) The nutritional quality of shrubs commonly used for feed by rabbits was the focus of a study summarized in the article "Estimation of Browse by Size Classes for Snowshoe Hare" (Journal of Wildlife Management [1980]: \(34-40\) ). The energy content \((\mathrm{cal} / \mathrm{g})\) of three sizes \((4 \mathrm{~mm}\) or less, \(5-7 \mathrm{~mm}\), and \(8-10 \mathrm{~mm}\) ) of serviceberries was studied. Let \(\mu_{1}, \mu_{2}\), and \(\mu_{3}\) denote the true energy content for the three size classes. Suppose that \(95 \%\) simultaneous confidence intervals for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}, \mu_{1}-\mu_{3}\), and \(\mu_{2}-\mu_{3}\) are \((-10,290),(150,450)\), and \((10,310)\), respectively. How would you interpret these intervals?

The article "Heavy Drinking and Problems Among Wine Drinkers" (Journal of Studies on Alcohol [1999]: 467-471) analyzed drinking problems among Canadians. For each of several different groups of drinkers, the mean and standard deviation of "highest number of drinks consumed" were calculated: \(\bar{x}\) $$\begin{array}{lccc} & \overline{\boldsymbol{x}} & \boldsymbol{s} & {n} \\ \hline \text { Beer only } & 7.52 & 6.41 & 1256 \\ \text { Wine only } & 2.69 & 2.66 & 1107 \\ \text { Spirits only } & 5.51 & 6.44 & 759 \\ \text { Beer and wine } & 5.39 & 4.07 & 1334 \\ \text { Beer and spirits } & 9.16 & 7.38 & 1039 \\ \text { Wine and spirits } & 4.03 & 3.03 & 1057 \\ \text { Beer, wine, and spirits } & 6.75 & 5.49 & 2151 \end{array}$$ Assume that each of the seven samples studied can be viewed as a random sample for the respective group. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean value of highest number of drinks consumed is not the same for all seven groups?

The degree of success at mastering a skill often depends on the method used to learn the skill. The article "Effects of Occluded Vision and Imagery on Putting Golf Balls" (Perceptual and Motor Skills [1995]: \(179-186\) ) reported on a study involving the following four learning methods: (1) visual contact and imagery, (2) nonvisual contact and imagery, (3) visual contact, and (4) control. There were 20 subjects randomly assigned to each method. The following summary information on putting performance score was reported: $$\begin{array}{cccccc} \text { Method } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & \\ \hline \bar{x} & 16.30 & 15.25 & 12.05 & 9.30 & \overline{\bar{x}}=13.23 \\ s & 2.03 & 3.23 & 2.91 & 2.85 & \end{array}$$ a. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude the mean putting performance score is not the same for the four methods? b. Calculate the \(95 \%\) T-K intervals, and then use the underscoring procedure described in this section to identify significant differences among the learning methods.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free