Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In the introduction to this chapter, we considered a study comparing three groups of college students (soccer athletes, nonsoccer athletes, and a control group consisting of students who did not participate in intercollegiate sports). The following information on scores from the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (which measures immediate memory recall) was $$\begin{array}{l|ccc} \text { Group } & \text { Soccer Athletes } & \text { Nonsoccer Athletes } & \text { Control } \\ \hline \text { Sample size } & 86 & 95 & 53 \\ \text { Sample mean score } & 29.90 & 30.94 & 29.32 \\ \begin{array}{l} \text { Sample standard } \\ \text { deviation } \end{array} & 3.73 & 5.14 & 3.78 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ In addition, \(\overline{\bar{x}}=30.19\). Suppose that it is reasonable to regard these three samples as random samples from the three student populations of interest. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean Hopkins score is not the same for the three student populations? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the comparison of the calculated F statistic to the critical F value, it can be determined whether there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis that all population means are equal and conclude that there is a statistically significant difference among the mean Hopkins scores of the Soccer athletes, Nonsoccer athletes, and control group.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Group Totals

For each group, multiply the sample mean by the sample size. For the Soccer Athletes group, this is \(29.90 * 86 = 2571.4\). For the Nonsoccer Athletes group, this is \(30.94 * 95 = 2939.3\). And for the control group, it is \(29.32 * 53 = 1552.96\)
02

Calculate the overall Total

You then sum up all the group totals to get the overall total. This is \(2571.4 + 2939.3 + 1552.96 = 7063.66\)
03

Calculate Sum of Squares Total (SSTO)

SSTO is the sum of the squares of the deviations between each individual and the general mean. Using the general mean \(\overline{\bar{x}}= 30.19\), the SSTO can be calculated.
04

Calculate Sum of Squares Between (SSB)

SSB is the sum of squares of the deviations between each group mean and the general mean, each multiplied by the size of that group. Use the means and sample sizes of each group to calculate SSB.
05

Calculate Sum of Squares Within (SSW)

SSW is the sum of the squares of the deviations within each group, which is simply SSTO - SSB.
06

Calculate degrees of freedom

The degrees of freedom for SSB (dfB) is the number of groups minus 1 (\(g - 1\)), for this example 2. The degrees of freedom for SSW (dfW) is the total number of observations minus the number of groups (\(n - g\))
07

Calculate Mean Square Between (MSB) and Mean Square Within (MSW)

MSB is SSB divided by its degrees of freedom and MSW is SSW divided by its degrees of freedom.
08

Compute F Statistic

F statistic is the ratio of MSB to MSW.
09

Compare to F Critical Value

Once we have found the F statistic, we can compare it with the critical F value for a given alpha level (0.05) and degrees of freedom. If the computed F is larger than the critical F, then we reject the null hypothesis that all population means are equal.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Utilizing Feedback and Goal Setting to Increase Performance Skills of Managers" (Academy of Management Journal \([1979]: 516-526\) ) reported the results of an experiment to compare three different interviewing techniques for employee evaluations. One method allowed the employee being evaluated to discuss previous evaluations, the second involved setting goals for the employee, and the third did not allow either feedback or goal setting. After the interviews were concluded, the evaluated employee was asked to indicate how satisfied he or she was with the interview. (A numerical scale was used to quantify level of satisfaction.) The authors used ANOVA to compare the three interview techniques. An \(F\) statistic value of \(4.12\) was reported. a. Suppose that a total of 33 subjects were used, with each technique applied to 11 of them. Use this information to conduct a level \(.05\) test of the null hypothesis of no difference in mean satisfaction level for the three interview techniques. b. The actual number of subjects on which each technique was used was \(45 .\) After studying the \(F\) table, explain why the conclusion in Part (a) still holds.

The article "The Soundtrack of Recklessness: Musical Preferences and Reckless Behavior Among Adolescents" (Journal of Adolescent Research [1992]: \(313-331\) ) described a study whose purpose was to determine whether adolescents who preferred certain types of music reported higher rates of reckless behaviors, such as speeding, drug use, shoplifting, and unprotected sex. Independently chosen random samples were selected from each of four groups of students with different musical preferences at a large high school: (1) acoustic/pop, (2) mainstream rock, $$\begin{array}{ccccccccc} \text { Type of Box } & & & {\text { Compression Strength (Ib) }} & & & & {\text { Sample Mean }} & {\text { Sample SD }} \\ \hline 1 & 655.5 & 788.3 & 734.3 & 721.4 & 679.1 & 699.4 & 713.00 & 46.55 \\ 2 & 789.2 & 772.5 & 786.9 & 686.1 & 732.1 & 774.8 & 756.93 & 40.34 \\ 3 & 737.1 & 639.0 & 696.3 & 671.7 & 717.2 & 727.1 & 698.07 & 37.20 \\ 4 & 535.1 & 628.7 & 542.4 & 559.0 & 586.9 & 520.0 & 562.02 & 39.87 \\ & & & & & & & \overline{\bar{x}} =682.50 & \end{array}$$ (3) hard rock, and (4) heavy metal. Each student in these samples was asked how many times he or she had engaged in various reckless activities during the last year. The following table lists data and summary quantities on driving over \(80 \mathrm{mph}\) that is consistent with summary quantities given in the article (the sample sizes in the article were much larger, but for the purposes of this exercise, we use \(\left.n_{1}=n_{2}=n_{3}=n_{4}=20\right)\) $$\begin{array}{rrrr} \text { Acoustic/Pop } & \text { Mainstream Rock } & \text { Hard Rock } & \text { Heavy Metal } \\ \hline 2 & 3 & 3 & 4 \\ 3 & 2 & 4 & 3 \\ 4 & 1 & 3 & 4 \\ 1 & 2 & 1 & 3 \\ 3 & 3 & 2 & 3 \\ 3 & 4 & 1 & 3 \\ 3 & 3 & 4 & 3 \\ 3 & 2 & 2 & 3 \\ 2 & 4 & 2 & 2 \\ 2 & 4 & 2 & 4 \\ 1 & 4 & 3 & 4 \\ 3 & 4 & 3 & 5 \\ 2 & 2 & 4 & 4 \\ 2 & 3 & 3 & 5 \\ 2 & 2 & 3 & 3 \\ 3 & 2 & 2 & 4 \\ 2 & 2 & 3 & 5 \\ 2 & 3 & 4 & 4 \\ 3 & 1 & 2 & 2 \\ 4 & 3 & 4 & 3 \\ 20 & 20 & 20 & 20 \\ 2.50 & 2.70 & 2.75 & 3.55 \\ .827 & .979 & .967 & .887 \\ 6830 & 0584 & 0351 & 7868 \end{array}$$ Also, \(N=80\), grand total \(=230.0\), and \(\overline{\bar{x}}=230.0 / 80=\) 2.875. Carry out an \(F\) test to determine if these data provide convincing evidence that the true mean number of times driving over 80 mph varies with musical preference.

Research carried out to investigate the relationship between smoking status of workers and short-term absenteeism rate (hr/mo) yielded the accompanying summary information ("Work-Related Consequences of Smoking Cessation," Academy of Management Journal [1989]: \(606-621) .\) In addition, \(F=2.56\). Construct an ANOVA table, and then state and test the appropriate hypotheses using a .01 significance level. $$\begin{array}{lrl} \text { Status } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Sample } \\ \text { Size } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Sample } \\ \text { Mean } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Continuous smoker } & 96 & 2.15 \\ \text { Recent ex-smoker } & 34 & 2.21 \\ \text { Long-term ex-smoker } & 86 & 1.47 \\ \text { Never smoked } & 206 & 1.69 \end{array}$$

Suppose that a random sample of size \(n=5\) was selected from the vineyard properties for sale in Sonoma County, California, in each of three years. The following data are consistent with summary information on price per acre (in dollars, rounded to the nearest thousand) for disease-resistant grape vineyards in Sonoma County (Wines and Vines, November 1999). $$\begin{array}{llllll} 1996 & 30,000 & 34,000 & 36,000 & 38,000 & 40,000 \\ 1997 & 30,000 & 35,000 & 37,000 & 38,000 & 40,000 \\ 1998 & 40,000 & 41,000 & 43,000 & 44,000 & 50,000 \end{array}$$ a. Construct boxplots for each of the three years on a common axis, and label each by year. Comment on the similarities and differences. b. Carry out an ANOVA to determine whether there is evidence to support the claim that the mean price per acre for vineyard land in Sonoma County was not the same for the three years considered. Use a significance level of \(.05\) for your test.

The degree of success at mastering a skill often depends on the method used to learn the skill. The article "Effects of Occluded Vision and Imagery on Putting Golf Balls" (Perceptual and Motor Skills [1995]: \(179-186\) ) reported on a study involving the following four learning methods: (1) visual contact and imagery, (2) nonvisual contact and imagery, (3) visual contact, and (4) control. There were 20 subjects randomly assigned to each method. The following summary information on putting performance score was reported: $$\begin{array}{cccccc} \text { Method } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & \\ \hline \bar{x} & 16.30 & 15.25 & 12.05 & 9.30 & \overline{\bar{x}}=13.23 \\ s & 2.03 & 3.23 & 2.91 & 2.85 & \end{array}$$ a. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude the mean putting performance score is not the same for the four methods? b. Calculate the \(95 \%\) T-K intervals, and then use the underscoring procedure described in this section to identify significant differences among the learning methods.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free