Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The article "The Influence of Temperature and Sunshine on the Alpha-Acid Contents of Hops" (Agricultural Meteorology [1974]: \(375-382\) ) used a multiple regression model to relate \(y=\) yield of hops to \(x_{1}=\) mean temperature \(\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right)\) between date of coming into hop and date of picking and \(x_{2}=\) mean percentage of sunshine during the same period. The model equation proposed is $$ y=415.11-6060 x_{1}-4.50 x_{2}+e $$ a. Suppose that this equation does indeed describe the true relationship. What mean yield corresponds to a temperature of 20 and a sunshine percentage of \(40 ?\) b. What is the mean yield when the mean temperature and percentage of sunshine are \(18.9\) and 43, respectively? c. Interpret the values of the population regression coefficients.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The mean yield of hops corresponding to a temperature of \(20^\circ C\) and sunshine percentage of 40 can be calculated using the formula. b. Similarly, for a temperature of \(18.9^\circ C\) and sunshine percentage of 43, the mean yield can again be calculated. c. The regression coefficients suggest an inverse relationship between both the temperature and sunshine percentage with the yield of hops. The temperature has a much stronger influence on the yield as compared to the sunshine percentage.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the mean yield for given temperature and sunshine percentage

From the multiple regression model, plug in the values for \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) from part (a): \(x_1 = 20\) and \(x_2 = 40\). The equation becomes: \(y = 415.11 - 6060(20) - 4.5(40)\)
02

Compute the value for y

Calculate the value for \(y\) from the equation in step 1. This will give the mean yield of hops that correspond to a temperature of \(20^\circ C\) and a sunshine percentage of 40.
03

Repeat calculation for another set of values

Repeat the process from steps 1 and 2 for part (b). For this part, \(x_1 = 18.9\) and \(x_2 = 43\). The equation now becomes: \(y = 415.11 - 6060(18.9) - 4.5(43)\)
04

Compute the value for y again

Calculate the value for \(y\) from the equation from step 3. This will give the mean yield of hops that corresponds to a temperature of \(18.9^\circ C\) and 43% sunshine.
05

Interpret the Population Regression Coefficients

The coefficients in the regression model represent how much the dependent variable \(y\) changes for each unit change in the respective independent variables \(x_1\) and \(x_2\), while holding the other variable constant. Negative coefficients indicate an inverse relationship, meaning as the independent variable increases, the dependent variable decreases, and vice versa. In this model, both \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) have negative coefficients, indicating that an increase in either temperature or sunshine percentage results in a decrease in the yield of hops, according to the model. The coefficient for temperature (-6060) is considerably higher in absolute value than the coefficient for sunshine percentage (-4.5), suggesting that temperature has a much stronger effect on yield than sunshine does, according to this model.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A manufacturer of wood stoves collected data on \(y=\) particulate matter concentration and \(x_{1}=\) flue temperature for three different air intake settings (low, medium, and high). a. Write a model equation that includes dummy variables to incorporate intake setting, and interpret all the \(\beta \mathrm{co}\) efficients. b. What additional predictors would be needed to incorporate interaction between temperature and intake setting?

Obtain as much information as you can about the \(P\) -value for an upper-tailed \(F\) test in each of the following situations: a. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=3, \mathrm{df}_{2}=15\), calculated \(F=4.23\) b. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=18\), calculated \(F=1.95\) c. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=5, \mathrm{df}_{2}=20\), calculated \(F=4.10\) d. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=35\), calculated \(F=4.58\)

The article "The Caseload Controversy and the Study of Criminal Courts" (Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology [1979]: 89-101) used a multiple regression analysis to help assess the impact of judicial caseload on the processing of criminal court cases. Data were collected in the Chicago criminal courts on the following variables: $$ \begin{aligned} y &=\text { number of indictments } \\ x_{1} &=\text { number of cases on the docket } \end{aligned} $$ \(x_{2}=\) number of cases pending in criminal court trial system The estimated regression equation (based on \(n=367\) observations) was $$ \hat{y}=28-.05 x_{1}-.003 x_{2}+.00002 x_{3} $$ where \(x_{3}=x_{1} x_{2}\) a. The reported value of \(R^{2}\) was . 16. Conduct the model utility test. Use a \(.05\) significance level. b. Given the results of the test in Part (a), does it surprise you that the \(R^{2}\) value is so low? Can you think of a possible explanation for this? c. How does adjusted \(R^{2}\) compare to \(R^{2}\) ?

For the multiple regression model in Exercise \(14.4\), the value of \(R^{2}\) was \(.06\) and the adjusted \(R^{2}\) was \(.06 .\) The model was based on a data set with 1136 observations. Perform a model utility test for this regression.

If we knew the width and height of cylindrical tin cans of food, could we predict the volume of these cans with precision and accuracy? a. Give the equation that would allow us to make such predictions. b. Is the relationship between volume and its predictors, height and width, a linear one? c. Should we use an additive multiple regression model to predict a volume of a can from its height and width? Explain. d. If you were to take logarithms of each side of the equation in Part (a), would the relationship be linear?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free