Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

According to "Assessing the Validity of the PostMaterialism Index" (American Political Science Review [1999]: \(649-664\) ), one may be able to predict an individual's level of support for ecology based on demographic and ideological characteristics. The multiple regression model proposed by the authors was $$ \begin{aligned} &y=3.60-.01 x_{1}+.01 x_{2}-.07 x_{3}+.12 x_{4}+.02 x_{5} \\ &\quad-.04 x_{6}-.01 x_{7}-.04 x_{8}-.02 x_{9}+e \end{aligned} $$ where the variables are defined as follows \(y=\) ecology score (higher values indicate a greater con- $$ \begin{aligned} & \text { cern for ecology) } \\ x_{1}=& \text { age times } 10 \end{aligned} $$ \(x_{2}=\) income (in thousands of dollars) \(x_{3}=\) gender \((1=\) male, \(0=\) female \()\) \(x_{4}=\) race \((1=\) white, \(0=\) nonwhite \()\) \(x_{5}=\) education (in years) \(x_{6}=\) ideology \((4=\) conservative, \(3=\) right of center, \(2=\) middle of the road, \(1=\) left of center, and \(0=\) liberal \()\) \(x_{7}=\) social class \((4=\) upper, \(3=\) upper middle, \(2=\) middle, \(1=\) lower middle, \(0=\) lower \()\) \(x_{8}=\) postmaterialist ( 1 if postmaterialist, 0 otherwise) \(x_{9}=\) materialist \((1\) if materialist, 0 otherwise) a. Suppose you knew a person with the following characteristics: a 25-year- old, white female with a college degree (16 years of education), who has a \(\$ 32,000\) -per-year job, is from the upper middle class and considers herself left of center, but who is neither a materialist nor a postmaterialist. Predict her ecology score. b. If the woman described in Part (a) were Hispanic rather than white, how would the prediction change? c. Given that the other variables are the same, what is the estimated mean difference in ecology score for men and women? d. How would you interpret the coefficient of \(x_{2}\) ? e. Comment on the numerical coding of the ideology and social class variables. Can you suggest a better way of incorporating these two variables into the model?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The predicted ecology score is calculated using the coefficients given in the model and the characteristics of the person. b. If the woman were Hispanic, her predicted ecology score would change due to the difference in value for the race coefficient. c. The estimated difference in ecology score for men and women is -0.07. d. The coefficient of \(x_{2}\) indicates that for each increase of 1 in the \(x_{2}\) variable (income), the ecology score increases by 0.01. e. One way to improve the coding of the variables for ideology and social class would be to measure and include the magnitude of differences between each category.

Step by step solution

01

Part a - Predicting Ecology Score

Given:- \(x_{1}\) (age): 25*10 = 250- \(x_{2}\) (income): $32,000 = 32- \(x_{3}\) (gender):0 (female)- \(x_{4}\) (race):1 (white)- \(x_{5}\) (education): 16 years- \(x_{6}\) (ideology): 1 (left of center)- \(x_{7}\) (social class):3 (upper middle)- \(x_{8}\) (postmaterialist):0 (not postmaterialist)- \(x_{9}\) (materialist):0 (not materialist)Substitute these values into the given linear equation and solve for y.
02

Part b - Predicting Adjusted Ecology Score

For this part, the woman is Hispanic, so \(x_{4}\) (race) changes to 0. Substitute this new value into the model and resolve it.
03

Part c - Estimated Mean Difference in Ecology Score

This question asks for the difference in ecology score between men and women. This is simply the coefficient for the gender variable, which is \(x_{3}\). Thus, the difference is -0.07.
04

Part d - Interpreting Coefficient of \(x_{2}\)

The coefficient of \(x_{2}\) is 0.01. This indicates that for each increase of 1 in the \(x_{2}\) variable (income in thousands of dollars), the ecology score increases by 0.01.
05

Part e - Commenting on Variable Coding and Suggesting Improvements

The variables for social class and ideology are arbitrarily coded without considering the distance between categories. One possible method to incorporate these variables into the model in a better way might be to measure and include the magnitude of differences between each category.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Impacts of On-Campus and Off-Campus Work on First-Year Cognitive Outcomes" (Journal of College Student Development \([1994]: 364-370\) ) reported on a study in which \(y=\) spring math comprehension score was regressed against \(x_{1}=\) previous fall test score, \(x_{2}=\) previous fall academic motivation, \(x_{3}=\) age, \(x_{4}=\) number of credit hours, \(x_{5}=\) residence \((1\) if on campus, 0 otherwise), \(x_{6}=\) hours worked on campus, and \(x_{7}=\) hours worked off campus. The sample size was \(n=210\), and \(R^{2}=.543\). Test to see whether there is a useful linear relationship between \(y\) and at least one of the predictors.

This exercise requires the use of a computer package. The authors of the article "Absolute Versus per Unit Body Length Speed of Prey as an Estimator of Vulnerability to Predation" (Animal Behaviour [1999]: \(347-\) 352) found that the speed of a prey (twips/s) and the length of a prey (twips \(\times 100\) ) are good predictors of the time (s) required to catch the prey. (A twip is a measure of distance used by programmers.) Data were collected in an experiment where subjects were asked to "catch" an animal of prey moving across his or her computer screen by clicking on it with the mouse. The investigators varied the length of the prey and the speed with which the prey moved across the screen. The following data are consistent with summary values and a graph given in the article. Each value represents the average catch time over all subjects. The order of the various speed-length combinations was randomized for each subject. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \begin{array}{c} \text { Prey } \\ \text { Length } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Prey } \\ \text { Speed } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Catch } \\ \text { Time } \end{array} \\ \hline 7 & 20 & 1.10 \\ 6 & 20 & 1.20 \\ 5 & 20 & 1.23 \\ 4 & 20 & 1.40 \\ 3 & 20 & 1.50 \\ 3 & 40 & 1.40 \\ 4 & 40 & 1.36 \\ 6 & 40 & 1.30 \\ 7 & 40 & 1.28 \\ 7 & 80 & 1.40 \\ 6 & 60 & 1.38 \\ 5 & 80 & 1.40 \\ 7 & 100 & 1.43 \\ 6 & 100 & 1.43 \\ 7 & 120 & 1.70 \\ 5 & 80 & 1.50 \\ 3 & 80 & 1.40 \\ 6 & 100 & 1.50 \\ 3 & 120 & 1.90 \\ & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Fit a multiple regression model for predicting catch time using prey length and speed as predictors. b. Predict the catch time for an animal of prey whose length is 6 and whose speed is 50 . c. Is the multiple regression model useful for predicting catch time? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\). d. The authors of the article suggest that a simple linear regression model with the single predictor \(x=\frac{\text { length }}{\text { speed }}\) might be a better model for predicting catch time. Calculate the \(x\) values and use them to fit this linear regression model. e. Which of the two models considered (the multiple regression model from Part (a) or the simple linear regression model from Part (d)) would you recommend for predicting catch time? Justify your choice.

The relationship between yield of maize, date of planting, and planting density was investigated in the article "Development of a Model for Use in Maize Replant Decisions" (Agronomy Journal [1980]: 459-464). Let \(\begin{aligned} y &=\text { percent maize yield } \\ x_{1} &=\text { planting date }(\text { days after April 20 }) \\ x_{2} &=\text { planting density (plants/ha) } \end{aligned}\) The regression model with both quadratic terms \((y=\alpha+\) \(\beta_{1} x_{1}+\beta_{2} x_{2}+\beta_{3} x_{3}+\beta_{4} x_{4}+e\) where \(x_{3}=x_{1}^{2}\) and \(x_{4}=x_{2}^{2}\) ) provides a good description of the relationship between \(y\) and the independent variables. a. If \(\alpha=21.09, \beta_{1}=.653, \beta_{2}=.0022, \beta_{3}=-.0206\), and \(\beta_{4}=.00004\), what is the population regression function? b. Use the regression function in Part (a) to determine the mean yield for a plot planted on May 6 with a density of 41,180 plants/ha. c. Would the mean yield be higher for a planting date of May 6 or May 22 (for the same density)? d. Is it legitimate to interpret \(\beta_{1}=.653\) as the true average change in yield when planting date increases by one day and the values of the other three predictors are held fixed? Why or why not?

The ability of ecologists to identify regions of greatest species richness could have an impact on the preservation of genetic diversity, a major objective of the World Conservation Strategy. The article "Prediction of Rarities from Habitat Variables: Coastal Plain Plants on Nova Scotian Lakeshores" (Ecology [1992]: \(1852-1859\) ) used a sample of \(n=37\) lakes to obtain the estimated regression equation $$ \begin{aligned} \hat{y}=& 3.89+.033 x_{1}+.024 x_{2}+.023 x_{3} \\ &+.008 x_{4}-.13 x_{5}-.72 x_{6} \end{aligned} $$ where \(y=\) species richness, \(x_{1}=\) watershed area, \(x_{2}=\) shore width, \(x_{3}=\) drainage \((\%), x_{4}=\) water color (total color units), \(x_{5}=\) sand \((\%)\), and \(x_{6}=\) alkalinity. The coefficient of multiple determination was reported as \(R^{2}=.83\). Use a test with significance level \(.01\) to decide whether the chosen model is useful.

The following statement appeared in the article "Dimensions of Adjustment Among College Women" (Journal of College Student Development \([1998]: 364):\) Regression analyses indicated that academic adjustment and race made independent contributions to academic achievement, as measured by current GPA. Suppose $$ \begin{aligned} y &=\text { current GPA } \\ x_{1} &=\text { academic adjustment score } \\ x_{2} &=\text { race (with white }=0 \text { , other }=1) \end{aligned} $$ What multiple regression model is suggested by the statement? Did you include an interaction term in the model? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free