Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that a multiple regression data set consists of \(n=15\) observations. For what values of \(k\), the number of model predictors, would the corresponding model with \(R^{2}=.90\) be judged useful at significance level \(.05 ?\) Does such a large \(R^{2}\) value necessarily imply a useful model? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
To determine the number of predictors a model can handle given a set of parameters, use an F-distribution given the \(R^{2}\) and significance level. While a high \(R^{2}\) value does imply a potentially useful model as it captures a high percentage of the variance in the dependent variable, it does not automatically guarantee it since we also need to validate the assumptions of the model and check against overfitting.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Coefficient of Determination \(R^{2}\)

The coefficient of determination, represented as \(R^{2}\), is a key measure used to assess the quality of a regression model. It provides the proportion of response variation that is captured by the regression model. In other words, an \(R^{2}\) value of .90 means that 90% of the variation in the dependent variable can be explained by the independent variables present in the model.
02

Determine Values of \(k\) Using F-Distribution and Significance Level

Since we want to judge if the model is statistically useful at a significance level of .05, we have to involve the use of F-distribution, specifically the upper quartile of the F-distribution. Given that we have the values for \(R^{2}\), \(n\), and significance level, we can obtain the threshold F-value. From there, we can isolate \(k\) by using the formula for F-value in multiple regression which is: \( F = \frac{R^{2}/k}{(1-R^{2})/(n-k-1)} \)
03

Implication of High \(R^{2}\)

A high \(R^{2}\) value does imply a potentially useful model, as it suggests that a high percentage of the variance in the dependent variable can be explained by the independent variables in the model. However, the deemed usefulness of the model that yields a high \(R^{2}\) value also depends on the validity of any assumptions made in the creation of the model and if the model is not overfitting the sample data (i.e., the model also performs well on unseen data).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Impacts of On-Campus and Off-Campus Work on First-Year Cognitive Outcomes" (Journal of College Student Development \([1994]: 364-370\) ) reported on a study in which \(y=\) spring math comprehension score was regressed against \(x_{1}=\) previous fall test score, \(x_{2}=\) previous fall academic motivation, \(x_{3}=\) age, \(x_{4}=\) number of credit hours, \(x_{5}=\) residence \((1\) if on campus, 0 otherwise), \(x_{6}=\) hours worked on campus, and \(x_{7}=\) hours worked off campus. The sample size was \(n=210\), and \(R^{2}=.543\). Test to see whether there is a useful linear relationship between \(y\) and at least one of the predictors.

Explain the difference between a deterministic and a probabilistic model. Give an example of a dependent variable \(y\) and two or more independent variables that might be related to \(y\) deterministically. Give an example of a dependent variable \(y\) and two or more independent variables that might be related to \(y\) in a probabilistic fashion.

A manufacturer of wood stoves collected data on \(y=\) particulate matter concentration and \(x_{1}=\) flue temperature for three different air intake settings (low, medium, and high). a. Write a model equation that includes dummy variables to incorporate intake setting, and interpret all the \(\beta \mathrm{co}\) efficients. b. What additional predictors would be needed to incorporate interaction between temperature and intake setting?

The relationship between yield of maize, date of planting, and planting density was investigated in the article "Development of a Model for Use in Maize Replant Decisions" (Agronomy Journal [1980]: 459-464). Let \(\begin{aligned} y &=\text { percent maize yield } \\ x_{1} &=\text { planting date }(\text { days after April 20 }) \\ x_{2} &=\text { planting density (plants/ha) } \end{aligned}\) The regression model with both quadratic terms \((y=\alpha+\) \(\beta_{1} x_{1}+\beta_{2} x_{2}+\beta_{3} x_{3}+\beta_{4} x_{4}+e\) where \(x_{3}=x_{1}^{2}\) and \(x_{4}=x_{2}^{2}\) ) provides a good description of the relationship between \(y\) and the independent variables. a. If \(\alpha=21.09, \beta_{1}=.653, \beta_{2}=.0022, \beta_{3}=-.0206\), and \(\beta_{4}=.00004\), what is the population regression function? b. Use the regression function in Part (a) to determine the mean yield for a plot planted on May 6 with a density of 41,180 plants/ha. c. Would the mean yield be higher for a planting date of May 6 or May 22 (for the same density)? d. Is it legitimate to interpret \(\beta_{1}=.653\) as the true average change in yield when planting date increases by one day and the values of the other three predictors are held fixed? Why or why not?

Suppose that the variables \(y, x_{1}\), and \(x_{2}\) are related by the regression model $$ y=1.8+.1 x_{1}+.8 x_{2}+e $$ a. Construct a graph (similar to that of Figure \(14.5)\) showing the relationship between mean \(y\) and \(x_{2}\) for fixed values 10,20 , and 30 of \(x_{1}\). b. Construct a graph depicting the relationship between mean \(y\) and \(x_{1}\) for fixed values 50,55, and 60 of \(x_{2}\). c. What aspect of the graphs in Parts (a) and (b) can be attributed to the lack of an interaction between \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) ? d. Suppose the interaction term \(.03 x_{3}\) where \(x_{3}=x_{1} x_{2}\) is added to the regression model equation. Using this new model, construct the graphs described in Parts (a) and (b). How do they differ from those obtained in Parts (a) and (b)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free