Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The following statement appeared in the article "Dimensions of Adjustment Among College Women" (Journal of College Student Development \([1998]: 364):\) Regression analyses indicated that academic adjustment and race made independent contributions to academic achievement, as measured by current GPA. Suppose $$ \begin{aligned} y &=\text { current GPA } \\ x_{1} &=\text { academic adjustment score } \\ x_{2} &=\text { race (with white }=0 \text { , other }=1) \end{aligned} $$ What multiple regression model is suggested by the statement? Did you include an interaction term in the model? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The multiple regression model is \(y = \beta_0 + \beta_1x_1 + \beta_2x_2 + \epsilon\). There's no need to include an interaction term as the problem states the variables contribute independently to the dependent variable.

Step by step solution

01

Define the variables

Define the given variables in the context of the problem: \(y\) for current GPA, \(x_1\) for academic adjustment score, and \(x_2\) for race where white is represented as 0, and others as 1.
02

Formulate the Regression Model

Form the multiple regression model based on the problem statement using the formula \(y = \beta_0 + \beta_1x_1 + \beta_2x_2 + \epsilon\), where \(y\) is the dependent variable (current GPA), \(\beta_0\) is the y-intercept, \(\beta_1\) and \(\beta_2\) are the coefficients of the independent variables \(x_1\) (academic adjustment score) and \(x_2\) (race), respectively, and \(\epsilon\) represents the error term. Each of the independent variables \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) are contributing independently as mentioned in the problem statement.
03

Decide on the Interaction Term

Determine whether to include an interaction term (\(\beta_3x_1x_2\)) in the model. An interaction term would indicate that the effect of one predictor variable depends on the value of another predictor variable. However, the problem statement says that the variables contribute independently to the GPA score, so the interaction term should not be included.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

This exercise requires the use of a computer package. The cotton aphid poses a threat to cotton crops in Iraq. The accompanying data on \(y=\) infestation rate (aphids/100 leaves) \(x_{1}=\) mean temperature \(\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right)\) \(x_{2}=\) mean relative humidity appeared in the article "Estimation of the Economic Threshold of Infestation for Cotton Aphid" (Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture [1982]: 71-75). Use the data to find the estimated regression equation and assess the utility of the multiple regression model $$ y=\alpha+\beta_{1} x_{1}+\beta_{2} x_{2}+e $$ $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrr} \boldsymbol{y} & \boldsymbol{x}_{1} & \boldsymbol{x}_{2} & \boldsymbol{y} & \boldsymbol{x}_{1} & \boldsymbol{x}_{2} \\ \hline 61 & 21.0 & 57.0 & 77 & 24.8 & 48.0 \\ 87 & 28.3 & 41.5 & 93 & 26.0 & 56.0 \\ 98 & 27.5 & 58.0 & 100 & 27.1 & 31.0 \\ 104 & 26.8 & 36.5 & 118 & 29.0 & 41.0 \\ 102 & 28.3 & 40.0 & 74 & 34.0 & 25.0 \\ 63 & 30.5 & 34.0 & 43 & 28.3 & 13.0 \\ 27 & 30.8 & 37.0 & 19 & 31.0 & 19.0\\\ 14 & 33.6 & 20.0 & 23 & 31.8 & 17.0 \\ 30 & 31.3 & 21.0 & 25 & 33.5 & 18.5 \\ 67 & 33.0 & 24.5 & 40 & 34.5 & 16.0 \\ 6 & 34.3 & 6.0 & 21 & 34.3 & 26.0 \\ 18 & 33.0 & 21.0 & 23 & 26.5 & 26.0 \\ 42 & 32.0 & 28.0 & 56 & 27.3 & 24.5 \\ 60 & 27.8 & 39.0 & 59 & 25.8 & 29.0 \\ 82 & 25.0 & 41.0 & 89 & 18.5 & 53.5 \\ 77 & 26.0 & 51.0 & 102 & 19.0 & 48.0 \\ 108 & 18.0 & 70.0 & 97 & 16.3 & 79.5 \end{array} $$

The article "The Caseload Controversy and the Study of Criminal Courts" (Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology [1979]: 89-101) used a multiple regression analysis to help assess the impact of judicial caseload on the processing of criminal court cases. Data were collected in the Chicago criminal courts on the following variables: $$ \begin{aligned} y &=\text { number of indictments } \\ x_{1} &=\text { number of cases on the docket } \end{aligned} $$ \(x_{2}=\) number of cases pending in criminal court trial system The estimated regression equation (based on \(n=367\) observations) was $$ \hat{y}=28-.05 x_{1}-.003 x_{2}+.00002 x_{3} $$ where \(x_{3}=x_{1} x_{2}\) a. The reported value of \(R^{2}\) was . 16. Conduct the model utility test. Use a \(.05\) significance level. b. Given the results of the test in Part (a), does it surprise you that the \(R^{2}\) value is so low? Can you think of a possible explanation for this? c. How does adjusted \(R^{2}\) compare to \(R^{2}\) ?

The accompanying MINITAB output results from fitting the model described in Exercise \(14.12\) to data. $$ \begin{array}{lrrr} \text { Predictor } & \text { Coef } & \text { Stdev } & \text { t-ratio } \\ \text { Constant } & 86.85 & 85.39 & 1.02 \\ \mathrm{X} 1 & -0.12297 & 0.03276 & -3.75 \\ \mathrm{X} 2 & 5.090 & 1.969 & 2.58 \\ \mathrm{X} 3 & -0.07092 & 0.01799 & -3.94 \\ \mathrm{X} 4 & 0.0015380 & 0.0005560 & 2.77 \\ \mathrm{~S}=4.784 & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{sq}=90.8 \% & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{s} q(\mathrm{adj})=89.4 \% \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{lrrr} \text { Analysis of Variance } & & & \\ & \text { DF } & \text { SS } & \text { MS } \\ \text { Regression } & 4 & 5896.6 & 1474.2 \\ \text { Error } & 26 & 595.1 & 22.9 \\ \text { Total } & 30 & 6491.7 & \end{array} $$ a. What is the estimated regression equation? b. Using a \(.01\) significance level, perform the model utility test. c. Interpret the values of \(R^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) given in the output.

The ability of ecologists to identify regions of greatest species richness could have an impact on the preservation of genetic diversity, a major objective of the World Conservation Strategy. The article "Prediction of Rarities from Habitat Variables: Coastal Plain Plants on Nova Scotian Lakeshores" (Ecology [1992]: \(1852-1859\) ) used a sample of \(n=37\) lakes to obtain the estimated regression equation $$ \begin{aligned} \hat{y}=& 3.89+.033 x_{1}+.024 x_{2}+.023 x_{3} \\ &+.008 x_{4}-.13 x_{5}-.72 x_{6} \end{aligned} $$ where \(y=\) species richness, \(x_{1}=\) watershed area, \(x_{2}=\) shore width, \(x_{3}=\) drainage \((\%), x_{4}=\) water color (total color units), \(x_{5}=\) sand \((\%)\), and \(x_{6}=\) alkalinity. The coefficient of multiple determination was reported as \(R^{2}=.83\). Use a test with significance level \(.01\) to decide whether the chosen model is useful.

This exercise requires the use of a computer package. The accompanying data resulted from a study of the relationship between \(y=\) brightness of finished paper and the independent variables \(x_{1}=\) hydrogen peroxide (\% by weight), \(x_{2}=\) sodium hydroxide (\% by weight), \(x_{3}=\) silicate \((\%\) by weight \()\), and \(x_{4}=\) process temperature ("Advantages of CE-HDP Bleaching for High Brightness Kraft Pulp Production," TAPPI [1964]: 107A-173A). $$ \begin{array}{ccccc} x_{1} & x_{2} & x_{3} & x_{4} & y \\ \hline .2 & .2 & 1.5 & 145 & 83.9 \\ .4 & .2 & 1.5 & 145 & 84.9 \\ .2 & .4 & 1.5 & 145 & 83.4 \\ .4 & .4 & 1.5 & 145 & 84.2 \\ .2 & .2 & 3.5 & 145 & 83.8 \\ .4 & .2 & 3.5 & 145 & 84.7 \\ .2 & .4 & 3.5 & 145 & 84.0 \\ .4 & .4 & 3.5 & 145 & 84.8 \\ .2 & .2 & 1.5 & 175 & 84.5 \\ .4 & .2 & 1.5 & 175 & 86.0 \\ .2 & .4 & 1.5 & 175 & 82.6 \\ .4 & .4 & 1.5 & 175 & 85.1 \\ .2 & .2 & 3.5 & 175 & 84.5 \\ .4 & .2 & 3.5 & 175 & 86.0 \\ .2 & .4 & 3.5 & 175 & 84.0 \\ .4 & .4 & 3.5 & 175 & 85.4 \\ .1 & .3 & 2.5 & 160 & 82.9 \\ .5 & .3 & 2.5 & 160 & 85.5\\\ .3 & .1 & 2.5 & 160 & 85.2 \\ .3 & .5 & 2.5 & 160 & 84.5 \\ .3 & .3 & 0.5 & 160 & 84.7 \\ .3 & .3 & 4.5 & 160 & 85.0 \\ .3 & .3 & 2.5 & 130 & 84.9 \\ .3 & .3 & 2.5 & 190 & 84.0 \\ .3 & .3 & 2.5 & 160 & 84.5 \\ .3 & .3 & 2.5 & 160 & 84.7 \\ .3 & .3 & 2.5 & 160 & 84.6 \\ .3 & .3 & 2.5 & 160 & 84.9 \\ .3 & .3 & 2.5 & 160 & 84.9 \\ .3 & .3 & 2.5 & 160 & 84.5 \\ .3 & .3 & 2.5 & 160 & 84.6 \end{array} $$ a. Find the estimated regression equation for the model that includes all independent variables, all quadratic terms, and all interaction terms. b. Using a \(.05\) significance level, perform the model utility test. c. Interpret the values of the following quantities: SSResid, \(R^{2}, s_{e}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free