Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A sample of \(n=10,000(x, y)\) pairs resulted in \(r=\) .022. Test \(H_{0}: \rho=0\) versus \(H_{a}: \rho \neq 0\) at significance level .05. Is the result statistically significant? Comment on the practical significance of your analysis.

Short Answer

Expert verified
To arrive at a short answer, the value of Z from the calculation in Step 1 is needed for comparison with the critical value. If |Z| > 1.96, the result is statistically significant and reject the null hypothesis. If |Z| ≤ 1.96, do not reject the null hypothesis. In terms of practical significance, considering the weak correlation of 0.022, there may not be any practical significance even if the result is statistically significant.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the test statistic

The test statistic Z for the correlation coefficient is determined by the formula \(Z = r \sqrt{(n - 2) / (1 - r^2)}\). Substituting the given values, we have \(Z = 0.022 \sqrt{(10,000 - 2) / (1 - 0.022^2)}\). Compute this expression to obtain the numerical value of Z.
02

Determine the critical value

The problem gives a significance level of 0.05. Since the problem does not specify the type of test (one-tailed or two-tailed), we assume a two-tailed test because the alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}: \rho \neq 0\) doesn't specify a direction. In this case, we will reject the null hypothesis if our test statistic falls in the top 2.5% or bottom 2.5% of the standard normal distribution. That’s because under the null hypothesis, we assume the correlation coefficient will follow a standard normal distribution. The critical value for a two-tailed test at 0.05 level is approximately 1.96.
03

Make a decision

After obtaining the value of Z from Step 1, compare this with the critical value from Step 2. If the absolute value of Z is greater than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Otherwise, do not reject the null hypothesis.
04

Consider practical significance

If the result is statistically significant, discuss its practical implications. Keep in mind that even though a result might be statistically significant, it might not have practical significance, especially if the correlation is very weak. In practical terms, a correlation of 0.022 is relatively weak, which means the variables are barely if at all, related.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercise \(13.17\), we considered a regression of \(y=\) oxygen consumption on \(x=\) time spent exercising. Summary quantities given there yield $$ \begin{aligned} &n=20 \quad \bar{x}=2.50 \quad S_{x x}=25 \\ &b=97.26 \quad a=592.10 \quad s_{e}=16.486 \end{aligned} $$ a. Calculate \(s_{a+b(2.0)}\) the estimated standard deviation of the statistic \(a+b(2.0)\). b. Without any further calculation, what is \(s_{a+b(3.0)}\) and what reasoning did you use to obtain it? c. Calculate the estimated standard deviation of the statistic \(a+b(2.8)\). d. For what value \(x^{*}\) is the estimated standard deviation of \(a+b x^{*}\) smallest, and why?

Data presented in the article "Manganese Intake and Serum Manganese Concentration of Human Milk-Fed and Formula-Fed Infants" (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition [1984]: \(872-878\) ) suggest that a simple linear regression model is reasonable for describing the relationship between \(y=\) serum manganese \((\mathrm{Mn})\) and \(x=\mathrm{Mn}\) intake \((\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{kg} /\) day \()\). Suppose that the true regression line is \(y=-2+1.4 x\) and that \(\sigma=1.2\). Then for a fixed \(x\) value, \(y\) has a normal distribution with mean \(-2+1.4 x\) and standard deviation \(1.2\). a. What is the mean value of serum Mn when Mn intake is \(4.0 ?\) When \(\mathrm{Mn}\) intake is \(4.5\) ? b. What is the probability that an infant whose Mn intake is \(4.0\) will have serum Mn greater than 5 ? c. Approximately what proportion of infants whose \(\mathrm{Mn}\) intake is 5 will have a serum Mn greater than 5 ? Less than \(3.8\) ?

Some straightforward but slightly tedious algebra shows that $$ \text { SSResid }=\left(1-r^{2}\right) \sum(y-\bar{y})^{2} $$ from which it follows that $$ s_{e}=\sqrt{\frac{n-1}{n-2}}\left(\sqrt{1-r^{2}}\right) s_{y} $$ Unless \(n\) is quite small, \((n-1) /(n-2) \approx 1\), so $$ s_{e} \approx\left(\sqrt{1-r^{2}}\right) s_{y} $$ a. For what value of \(r\) is \(s_{e}\) as large as \(s_{y}\) ? What is the equation of the least-squares line in this case? b. For what values of \(r\) will \(s_{e}\) be much smaller than \(s_{y} ?\)

The article "Technology, Productivity, and Industry Structure" (Technological Forecasting and Social Change [1983]: \(1-13\) ) included the accompanying data on \(x=\) research and development expenditure and \(y=\) growth rate for eight different industries. $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrrrrr} x & 2024 & 5038 & 905 & 3572 & 1157 & 327 & 378 & 191 \\ y & 1.90 & 3.96 & 2.44 & 0.88 & 0.37 & -0.90 & 0.49 & 1.01 \end{array} $$ a. Would a simple linear regression model provide useful information for predicting growth rate from research and development expenditure? Use a .05 level of significance. b. Use a \(90 \%\) confidence interval to estimate the average change in growth rate associated with a 1 -unit increase in expenditure. Interpret the resulting interval.

Exercise \(13.10\) presented information from a study in which \(y\) was the hardness of molded plastic and \(x\) was the time elapsed since termination of the molding process. Summary quantities included \(n=15 \quad b=2.50 \quad\) SSResid \(=1235.470\) $$ \sum(x-\bar{x})^{2}=4024.20 $$ a. Calculate the estimated standard deviation of the statistic \(b\). b. Obtain a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\beta\), the slope of the true regression line. c. Does the interval in Part (b) suggest that \(\beta\) has been precisely estimated? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free