Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If the sample correlation coefficient is equal to 1 , is it necessarily true that \(\rho=1 ?\) If \(\rho=1\), is it necessarily true that \(r=1 ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, if r is equal to 1 it does not necessarily mean that \(\rho\) is equal to 1 because the sample data may not perfectly represent the population. Yes, if \(\rho\) is equal to 1, it means that r should be 1 as the sample must represent the population correlation.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Correlations

In correlation, '1' often represents a perfect positive correlation. This means that for every positive increase in one variable, there is a positive increase of a fixed proportion in the other. In terms of 'r' and '\(\rho\)', it's possible that both can hit the extreme value of '1' but each under different circumstances.
02

Correlation Coefficient r=1

The sample correlation coefficient 'r' equals 1 when there is a perfect positive relationship in the sample data i.e., an increase in one variable corresponds to a proportional increase in the other. This, however, does not necessarily mean '\(\rho=1\)' because the sample may not perfectly represent the population.
03

Population Correlation Coefficient \(\rho=1\)

The population correlation coefficient '\(\rho\)' equals 1 when there is a perfect positive correlation between two variables across the entire population. If this is the case, any sample taken from the population should also show a perfect positive correlation, thus, 'r' should also be equal to 1.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(x\) be the size of a house (sq \(\mathrm{ft}\) ) and \(y\) be the amount of natural gas used (therms) during a specified period. Suppose that for a particular community, \(x\) and \(y\) are related according to the simple linear regression model with \(\beta=\) slope of population regression line \(=.017\) \(\alpha=y\) intercept of population regression line \(=-5.0\) a. What is the equation of the population regression line? b. Graph the population regression line by first finding the point on the line corresponding to \(x=1000\) and then the point corresponding to \(x=2000\), and drawing a line through these points. c. What is the mean value of gas usage for houses with 2100 sq \(\mathrm{ft}\) of space? d. What is the average change in usage associated with a 1-sq-ft increase in size? e. What is the average change in usage associated with a 100-sq-ft increase in size? f. Would you use the model to predict mean usage for a 500-sq-ft house? Why or why not? (Note: There are no small houses in the community in which this model is valid.)

The accompanying summary quantities resulted from a study in which \(x\) was the number of photocopy machines serviced during a routine service call and \(y\) was the total service time (min): \(n=16 \quad \sum(y-\bar{y})^{2}=22,398.05 \quad \sum(y-\hat{y})^{2}=2620.57\) a. What proportion of observed variation in total service time can be explained by a linear probabilistic relationship between total service time and the number of machines serviced? b. Calculate the value of the estimated standard deviation \(s_{e .}\) What is the number of degrees of freedom associated with this estimate?

An investigation of the relationship between traf. fic flow \(x\) (thousands of cars per \(24 \mathrm{hr}\) ) and lead content \(y\) of bark on trees near the highway (mg/g dry weight) yielded the accompanying data. A simple linear regression model was fit, and the resulting estimated regression line was \(\hat{y}=28.7+33.3 x .\) Both residuals and standardized residuals are also given. a. Plot the \((x\), residual \()\) pairs. Does the resulting plot suggest that a simple linear regression model is an appropriate choice? Explain your reasoning. b. Construct a standardized residual plot. Does the plot differ significantly in general appearance from the plot in Part (a)?

A sample of \(n=61\) penguin burrows was selected. and values of both \(y=\) trail length \((\mathrm{m})\) and \(x=\) soil hardness (force required to penetrate the substrate to a depth of \(12 \mathrm{~cm}\) with a certain gauge, in \(\mathrm{kg}\) ) were determined for each one ("Effects of Substrate on the Distribution of Magellanic Penguin Burrows," The Auk [1991]: 923-933). The equation of the least-squares line was \(\hat{y}=11.607-\) \(1.4187 x\), and \(r^{2}=.386\). a. Does the relationship between soil hardness and trail length appear to be linear, with shorter trails associated with harder soil (as the article asserted)? Carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses. b. Using \(s_{e}=2.35, \bar{x}=4.5\), and \(\sum(x-\bar{x})^{2}=250\), predict trail length when soil hardness is \(6.0\) in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the prediction. c. Would you use the simple linear regression model to predict trail length when hardness is \(10.0 ?\) Explain your reasoning.

The effects of grazing animals on grasslands have been the focus of numerous investigations by ecologists. One such study, reported in "The Ecology of Plants, Large Mammalian Herbivores, and Drought in Yellowstone National Park" (Ecology [1992]: 2043-2058), proposed using the simple linear regression model to relate \(y=\) green biomass concentration \(\left(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\right)\) to \(x=\) elapsed time since snowmelt (days). a. The estimated regression equation was given as \(\hat{y}=\) \(106.3-.640 x\). What is the estimate of average change in biomass concentration associated with a 1 -day increase in elapsed time? b. What value of biomass concentration would you predict when elapsed time is 40 days? c. The sample size was \(n=58\), and the reported value of the coefficient of determination was .470. Does this suggest that there is a useful linear relationship between the two variables? Carry out an appropriate test.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free