Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Do teenage boys worry more than teenage girls? This is one of the questions addressed by the authors of the article "The Relationship of Self-Esteem and Attributional Style to Young People's Worries" (Journal of Psychology [1987]: 207-215). A scale called the Worries Scale was administered to a group of teenagers, and the results are summarized in the accompanying table. \begin{tabular}{lccc} & & Sample & Sample \\ Gender & \(n\) & Mean Score & sd \\ \hline Girls & 108 & \(62.05\) & \(9.5\) \\ Boys & 78 & \(67.59\) & \(9.7\) \\ & & & \\ \hline \end{tabular} Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that teenage boys score higher on the Worries Scale than teenage girls? Use a significance level of \(\alpha=.05\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The answer really depends on the t-statistic calculated in step 2. If the calculated t-statistic is higher than 1.653, then we can conclude that there is sufficient evidence to say that the teenage boys score higher on the Worries Scale than teenage girls. If it is lower, we cannot conclude the same. You'll need to measure the values into the formulas correctly in order to achieve a valid result.

Step by step solution

01

Formulation of Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The first step in hypothesis testing is to formulate the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is the claim that there is no difference between the mean scores of boys and girls, i.e., the mean score of boys equals the mean score of girls. The alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)) is the claim that there is a difference, in this case, that the mean score of boys is higher than that of girls. So, \(H_0: \mu_{boys} = \mu_{girls}\) and \(H_1: \mu_{boys} > \mu_{girls}\) (\(\mu\) refers to the population mean).
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

Next, calculate the t-statistic using the formula: \( t = (\bar{x}_{boys} - \bar{x}_{girls}) / \sqrt{ (s_{b}^2/n_{b}) + (s_{g}^2/n_{g}) } \) where \(\bar{x}\) denotes the sample mean, \(s\) denotes the standard deviation, and \(n\) denotes the sample size. In this scenario, the values would be as follows: \(\bar{x}_{boys} = 67.59\), \(\bar{x}_{girls} = 62.05\), \(s_{boys} = 9.7\), \(s_{girls} = 9.5\), \(n_{boys} = 78\), and \(n_{girls} =108\).
03

Determine the Critical t-value

The critical value of t is determined by the chosen significance level, and the degrees of freedom, which is the sum of the two sample sizes minus 2 (\(n_{boys} + n_{girls} - 2\)). For a significance level of \(alpha = .05\) with a one-tailed test (because the problem involves a 'greater than' hypothesis), degrees of freedom = 184 (78 +108 -2), you get a critical value of approximately 1.653.
04

Compare Test Statistic with Critical t-value and Make Decision

The decision rule is as follows: if the calculated t-statistic is greater than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis. If it is less, fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, compare the calculated t-statistic with 1.653 decide whether to reject or accept \(H_0\).
05

Conclusion

Interpret results in the context of the problem. If you rejected the null hypothesis, you can conclude that there is sufficient evidence that teenage boys worry more than teenage girls according to the Worries Scale. If you failed to reject the null hypothesis, you can conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest that one worries more than the other based on the given sample data.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null and Alternative Hypotheses
When we talk about null and alternative hypotheses in statistics, we delve into the heart of hypothesis testing. The null hypothesis, denoted as \( H_0 \), represents the default statement that there is no effect or no difference. In the context of the exercise, the null hypothesis posits that there is no difference in the mean Worries Scale scores between teenage boys and girls.

On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis, denoted as \( H_1 \), contradicts the null hypothesis, suggesting that there is an effect or a difference. In our study, the alternative hypothesis claims that teenage boys have a higher mean Worries Scale score than girls. To sum it up, for the given problem, the null hypothesis is \( H_0: \mu_{boys} = \mu_{girls} \) and the alternative hypothesis is \( H_1: \mu_{boys} > \mu_{girls} \). Establishing these hypotheses frames the direction of our statistical test.
Test Statistic Calculation
The test statistic is a standardized value that is calculated from sample data during a hypothesis test. Its purpose is to help us decide whether to support or reject the null hypothesis. To compute this statistic, we use the formula:
\[ t = (\bar{x}_{boys} - \bar{x}_{girls}) / \sqrt{ (s_{b}^2/n_{b}) + (s_{g}^2/n_{g}) } \]
This formula compares the difference in sample means to the variability of the scores. The numerator represents the observed difference between sample means, while the denominator encompasses the standard error of the difference. A higher absolute value of the test statistic indicates greater evidence against the null hypothesis. For the Worries Scale problem, plugging in the sample means, standard deviations, and sizes leads us to our calculated t-statistic.
Critical Value Determination
Determining the critical value is essential in the process of hypothesis testing. It is the threshold against which the test statistic is compared to decide whether the null hypothesis should be rejected. The critical value depends on the predetermined significance level and the distribution of the test statistic.

In this case, we're using a t-distribution to find our critical value. Since we are performing a one-tailed test with a significance level \( \alpha = .05 \), we look to the t-distribution table to find the critical value that corresponds to an area of 0.05 in the upper tail of the distribution with the appropriate degrees of freedom (184 in this scenario). A t-distribution is skewed based on the number of degrees of freedom but tends towards a normal distribution as the degrees of freedom increase.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted as \( \alpha \), is a threshold set by the researcher indicating the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Commonly, a level of 0.05 is used, which offers a good balance between the risks of making a Type I error (false positive) and not detecting a true effect (Type II error).

In the current problem, we're using a significance level of \( \alpha = .05 \). This represents a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none. Based on this level, and the critical value, we will decide whether the evidence from our sample is strong enough to reject the null hypothesis.
t-test Analysis
The t-test is a statistical procedure used to determine whether there is a significant difference between the means of two groups. In the Worries Scale problem, we’re conducting an independent samples t-test because we're comparing the scores of two separate groups—teenage boys and girls.

Analysis involves comparing the calculated t-statistic to the critical t-value. If the t-statistic falls into the critical region (exceeding the critical value), it suggests that there's a statistically significant difference between the group means at the chosen significance level. Thus, the null hypothesis would be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis—that teenage boys score higher on the Worries Scale than teenage girls.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

"Doctors Praise Device That Aids Ailing Hearts" (Associated Press, November 9,2004 ) is the headline of an article that describes the results of a study of the effectiveness of a fabric device that acts like a support stocking for a weak or damaged heart. In the study, 107 people who consented to treatment were assigned at random to either a standard treatment consisting of drugs or the experimental treatment that consisted of drugs plus surgery to install the stocking. After two years, \(38 \%\) of the 57 patients receiving the stocking had improved and \(27 \%\) of the patients receiving the standard treatment had improved. Do these data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of patients who improve is higher for the experimental treatment than for the standard treatment? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\).

The article "So Close, Yet So Far: Predictors of Attrition in College Seniors" (Journal of College Student Development \([1999]: 343-354\) ) attempts to describe differences between college seniors who disenroll before graduating and those who do graduate. Researchers randomly selected 42 nonreturning and 48 returning seniors, none of whom were transfer students. These 90 students rated themselves on personal contact and campus involvement. The resulting data are summarized here: \begin{tabular}{lcccc} & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Returning \((n=48)\)} & & Nonrefurning \((n=42)\) \\ \cline { 2 } \cline { 4 - 5 } & & Standard & & Standard \\ & Mean Deviation & & Mean & Deviation \\ \hline Personal & & & & \\ Contact & \(3.22\) & \(.93\) & & \(2.41\) & \(1.03\) \\ Campus & & & & \\ Involvement & \(3.21\) & \(1.01\) & \(3.31\) & \(1.03\) \\ & & & & \end{tabular} a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean campus involvement rating for returning and nonreturning students. Does your interval support the statement that students who do not return are less involved, on average, than those who do? Explain. b. Do students who don't return have a lower mean personal contact rating than those who do return? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\).

Do girls think they don't need to take as many science classes as boys? The article "Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences" (Science Education [1999]: \(55-76\) ) gives information from a survey of children in grades 4,5, and \(6 .\) The 224 girls participating in the survey each indicated the number of science courses they intended to take in the future, and they also indicated the number of science courses they thought boys their age should take in the future. For each girl, the authors calculated the difference between the number of science classes she intends to take and the number she thinks boys should take. a. Explain why these data are paired. b. The mean of the differences was \(-.83\) (indicating girls intended, on average, to take fewer classes than they thought boys should take), and the standard deviation was 1.51. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean difference.

In December 2001, the Department of Veterans Affairs announced that it would begin paying benefits to soldiers suffering from Lou Gehrig's disease who had served in the Gulf War (The New York Times, December 11,2001 ). This decision was based on an analysis in which the Lou Gehrig's disease incidence rate (the proportion developing the disease) for the approximately 700,000 soldiers sent to the Gulf between August 1990 and July 1991 was compared to the incidence rate for the approximately \(1.8\) million other soldiers who were not in the Gulf during this time period. Based on these data, explain why it is not appropriate to perform a formal inference procedure (such as the two-sample \(z\) test) and yet it is still reasonable to conclude that the incidence rate is higher for Gulf War veterans than for those who did not serve in the Gulf War.

The article "Trial Lawyers and Testosterone: BlueCollar Talent in a White- Collar World" (Journal of Applied Social Psychology [1998]: 84-94) compared trial lawyers and nontrial lawyers on the basis of mean testosterone level. Random samples of 35 male trial lawyers, 31 male nontrial lawyers, 13 female trial lawyers, and 18 female nontrial lawyers were selected for study. The article includes the following statement: "Trial lawyers had higher testosterone levels than did nontrial lawyers. This was true for men, \(t(64)=3.75, p<.001\), and for women, \(t(29)=2.26, p<.05 . "\) a. Based on the information given, is there a significant difference in the mean testosterone level for male trial and nontrial lawyers? b. Based on the information given, is there a significant difference in the mean testosterone level for female trial and nontrial lawyers? c. Do you have enough information to carry out a test to determine whether there is a significant difference in the mean testosterone levels of male and female trial lawyers? If so, carry out such a test. If not, what additional information would you need to be able to conduct the test?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free