Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The positive effect of water fluoridation on dental health is well documented. One study that validates this is described in the article "Impact of Water Fluoridation on Children's Dental Health: A Controlled Study of Two Pennsylvania Communities" (American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section \([1981]:\) 262-265). Two communities were compared. One had adopted fluoridation in 1966, whereas the other had no such program. Of 143 randomly selected children from the town without fluoridated water, 106 had decayed teeth, and 67 of 119 randomly selected children from the town with fluoridated water had decayed teeth. Let \(\pi_{1}\) denote the true proportion of children drinking fluoridated water who have decayed teeth, and let \(\pi_{2}\) denote the analogous proportion for children drinking unfluoridated water. Estimate \(\pi_{1}-\pi_{2}\) using a \(90 \%\) confidence interval. Does the interval contain \(0 ?\) Interpret the interval.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The solution will be the resulting confidence interval which will be found after these calculations. If the confidence interval contains zero, that suggests that there may be no significant difference in decay rates between the two communities. The specific confidence interval will give more details about the significance and range of this difference.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate proportions

Firstly, the proportion of children with decayed teeth who drink fluoridated and unfluoridated water should be calculated. The proportion \(p_{1}\) of children drinking fluoridated water who have decayed teeth is \(67/119\). The corresponding proportion \(p_{2}\) for children drinking unfluoridated water is \(106/143\).
02

Calculate the difference in proportions

Next, find the difference in proportions, \(p_{1} - p_{2}\). This gives the estimated difference in the proportions of children with decayed teeth between those who drink fluoridated and unfluoridated water.
03

Compute Standard Error

The Standard Error (SE) for the difference in proportions estimate can be obtained by the formula: \(SE=\sqrt{\frac{p_{1}(1-p_{1})}{n_{1}}+\frac{p_{2}(1-p_{2})}{n_{2}}}\), where \(n_{1}\) and \(n_{2}\) are the number of observations, in this case the number of children in each community.
04

Find z-value and compute Confidence Interval

For a 90% confidence interval, the z-value will be \(Z=1.645\). This can be found from the standard normal distribution table or a calculator. The formula for confidence interval (CI) is given by: \(CI = (p_{1} - p_{2}) \pm Z*SE\). Now, plug in values to find the confidence interval.
05

Check Zero in Interval and Interpret Result

Now, check the confidence interval for zero. If the confidence interval contains zero, it implies that there is no significant difference between the proportions. Otherwise, one could say there's a significant difference. An interpretation of the interval is then provided.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Proportion in Statistics
In statistics, the term 'proportion' refers to the fraction of the total that possesses a certain attribute or characteristic. It's a measure of how prevalent a certain feature is within a specific group or population. Proportions are widely used in studies to make statements about larger populations based on sample data.

In the exercise example, proportions are used to determine the percentage of children with decayed teeth in communities with and without fluoridated water. By calculating these proportions, we can compare the dental health outcomes of the two different environments. This kind of analysis is critical not only in health studies but in various fields where we compare the occurrences of certain characteristics among groups.

When interpreting proportions, it's crucial to understand that they represent a snapshot based on the sample data at hand. In the given study, the proportions of children with decayed teeth—calculated as the number of children with decayed teeth divided by the total number of children surveyed in each community—serve as estimates for what we might expect in the broader population of similar communities.
Standard Error: Estimating the Variability
Standard Error (SE) is a statistical measure that indicates the accuracy with which a sample represents a population. In simple terms, it's a gauge of how much the sample mean would vary if you drew different samples from the same population.

The standard error of the difference in proportions, as seen in our exercise, tells us how precise our estimate of that difference is. The formula \(SE=\sqrt{\frac{p_1(1-p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{p_2(1-p_2)}{n_2}}\) accounts for variability within each group of children—those drinking fluoridated and unfluoridated water. The smaller the standard error, the more reliable our estimated difference in proportion is.

Why is SE important? Because it plays a critical role in constructing confidence intervals and conducting hypothesis tests. Without a reliable SE, we can't trust the accuracy of these intervals or tests. Thus, when interpreting the standard error, comprehension that a smaller SE indicates a more precise estimate is fundamental.
Statistical Significance and Its Relevance
Statistical significance is a determination of whether an observed effect or difference is likely to be genuine or if it could have happened by random chance. This concept is central to hypothesis testing and can provide a strong foundation for making inferences in research.

In the context of our exercise, we're looking at whether the difference in tooth decay between children in communities with and without fluoridated water is statistically significant. After calculating the confidence interval, we check to see if zero is within this interval. If it is not, we infer that the difference in proportions is statistically significant—that is, it's unlikely to be due to just chance alone.

Interpreting the interval is crucial: A confidence interval that doesn't include zero suggests a meaningful difference that could warrant further investigation or action, whereas an interval containing zero might indicate that any observed differences could simply be the result of random variation. Understanding statistical significance allows students and researchers to make better judgments about their data and to draw more accurate conclusions from their studies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two different underground pipe coatings for preventing corrosion are to be compared. The effect of a coating (as measured by maximum depth of corrosion penetration on a piece of pipe) may vary with depth, orientation, soil type, pipe composition, etc. Describe how an experiment that filters out the effects of these extraneous factors could be carried out.

An individual can take either a scenic route to work or a nonscenic route. She decides that use of the nonscenic route can be justified only if it reduces true average travel time by more than \(10 \mathrm{~min}\). a. If \(\mu_{1}\) refers to the scenic route and \(\mu_{2}\) to the nonscenic route, what hypotheses should be tested? b. If \(\mu_{1}\) refers to the nonscenic route and \(\mu_{2}\) to the scenic route, what hypotheses should be tested?

The state of Georgia's HOPE scholarship program guarantees fully paid tuition to Georgia public universities for Georgia high school seniors who have a B average in academic requirements as long as they maintain a B average in college. (See "Who Loses HOPE? Attrition from Georgia's College Scholarship Program" (Southern Economic Journal [1999]: \(379-390\) ).) It was reported that \(53.2 \%\) of a random sample of 137 students entering Ivan Allen College at Georgia Tech (social science and human- ities) with a HOPE scholarship lost the scholarship at the end of the first year because they had a GPA of less than 3.0. It was also reported that 72 of a random sample of 111 students entering the College of Computing with a \(\mathrm{B}\) average had lost their HOPE scholarship by the end of the first year. Is there evidence that the proportion who lose HOPE scholarships is different for the College of Computing than for the Ivan Allen College?

The article "The Sorority Rush Process: SelfSelection, Acceptance Criteria, and the Effect of Rejection" (Journal of College Student Development [1994]: \(346-353\) ) reported on a study of factors associated with the decision to rush a sorority. Fifty-four women who rushed a sorority and 51 women who did not were asked how often they drank alcoholic beverages. For the sorority rush group, the mean was \(2.72\) drinks per week and the standard deviation .86. For the group who did not rush, the mean was \(2.11\) and the standard deviation \(1.02 .\) Is there evidence to support the claim that those who rush a sorority drink more than those who do not rush? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\). What assumptions are required in order for the two-sample \(t\) test to be appropriate?

Two proposed computer mouse designs were compared recording wrist extension in degrees for 24 people who each used both mouse types ("Comparative Study of Two Computer Mouse Designs" Cornell Human Factors Laboratory Technical Report RP7992). The difference in wrist extension was computed by subtracting extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) from the wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) for each student. The mean difference was reported to be \(8.82\) degrees. Assume that it is reasonable to regard this sample of 24 people as representative of the population of computer users. a. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 10 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) is greater than for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) ? Use a \(.05\) significance level. b. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 25 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) is greater than for mouse type B? Use a .05 significance level. c. Briefly explain why a different conclusion was reached in the hypothesis tests of Parts (a) and (b).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free