Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Are college students who take a freshman orientation course more or less likely to stay in college than those who do not take such a course? The article "A Longitudinal Study of the Retention and Academic Performance of Participants in Freshmen Orientation Courses" (Journal of College Student Development \([1994]: 444-\) 449) reported that 50 of 94 randomly selected students who did not participate in an orientation course returned for a second year. Of 94 randomly selected students who did take the orientation course, 56 returned for a second year. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\pi_{1}-\pi_{2}\), the difference in the proportion returning for students who do not take an orientation course and those who do. Give an interpretation of this interval.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The \(95\%\) confidence interval for \(\pi_{1}-\pi_{2}\) will provide a range of values that includes the true population parameter \(95\%\) of the time. The interpretation will depend on the computed interval. If 0 is included in the interval, then there is no significant difference in the return rates for the two groups.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Given Data

From the problem, we know that 50 of 94 students who did not participate in the orientation course returned for a second year, therefore \(\pi_{1} = \frac{50}{94}\). Similarly, 56 of 94 students who did take the course, returned for a second year, so \(\pi_{2} = \frac{56}{94}\). We are asked to compute a \(95\%\) confidence interval.
02

Calculate the Standard Error

The standard error (SE) for \(\pi_{1} - \pi_{2}\) can be calculated using the formula: \[ \text{SE}_{\pi_{1} - \pi_{2}} = \sqrt{\frac{\pi_{1} (1 - \pi_{1})}{n_1} + \frac{\pi_{2} (1 - \pi_{2})}{n_2}} \] Where \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) represent the number of individuals in each group, both of which are 94 in this case.
03

Calculate the Confidence Interval

A \(95\%\) confidence interval can be calculated using the following formula: \[ CI = (\pi_{1} - \pi_{2}) \pm Z_{0.025} \times \text{SE}_{\pi_{1} - \pi_{2}} \] Here \(Z_{0.025}\) is the z-value for a \(95\%\) interval, which is 1.96.
04

Interpret the Confidence Interval

The confidence interval will give the range of values within which we are \(95\%\) confident that the difference between the two proportions lies. If the interval includes 0, it suggests no significant difference between the likelihood of returning to college based on whether or not they attended the orientation. If all values in the interval are positive (or negative), it would suggest a significant difference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Foraging Behavior of the Indian False Vampire Bat" (Biotropica \([1991]: 63-67\) ) reported that 36 of 193 female bats in flight spent more than 5 min in the air before locating food. For male bats, 64 of 168 spent more than 5 min in the air. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of flights longer than \(5 \mathrm{~min}\) in length differs for males and females? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\).

Suppose that you were interested in investigating the effect of a drug that is to be used in the treatment of patients who have glaucoma in both eyes. A comparison between the mean reduction in eye pressure for this drug and for a standard treatment is desired. Both treatments are applied directly to the eye. a. Describe how you would go about collecting data for your investigation. b. Does your method result in paired data? c. Can you think of a reasonable method of collecting data that would result in independent samples? Would such an experiment be as informative as a paired experiment? Comment.

Dentists make many people nervous (even more so than statisticians!). To see whether such nervousness elevates blood pressure, the blood pressure and pulse rates of 60 subjects were measured in a dental setting and in a medical setting ("The Effect of the Dental Setting on Blood Pressure Measurement," American Journal of \(P u b-\) lic Health \([1983]: 1210-1214)\). For each subject, the difference (dental-setting blood pressure minus medicalsetting blood pressure) was calculated. The analogous differences were also calculated for pulse rates. Summary data follows.

In December 2001, the Department of Veterans Affairs announced that it would begin paying benefits to soldiers suffering from Lou Gehrig's disease who had served in the Gulf War (The New York Times, December 11,2001 ). This decision was based on an analysis in which the Lou Gehrig's disease incidence rate (the proportion developing the disease) for the approximately 700,000 soldiers sent to the Gulf between August 1990 and July 1991 was compared to the incidence rate for the approximately \(1.8\) million other soldiers who were not in the Gulf during this time period. Based on these data, explain why it is not appropriate to perform a formal inference procedure (such as the two-sample \(z\) test) and yet it is still reasonable to conclude that the incidence rate is higher for Gulf War veterans than for those who did not serve in the Gulf War.

Breast feeding sometimes results in a temporary loss of bone mass as calcium is depleted in the mother's body to provide for milk production. The paper "Bone Mass Is Recovered from Lactation to Postweaning in Adolescent Mothers with Low Calcium Intakes" (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition [2004]: \(1322-1326\) ) gave the following data on total body bone mineral content \((\mathrm{g})\) for a sample of mothers both during breast feeding (B) and in the postweaning period (P). Do the data suggest that true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning exceeds that during breast feeding by more than \(25 \mathrm{~g}\) ? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\). \(\begin{array}{lllllll}\text { Subject } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\ \text { B } & 1928 & 2549 & 2825 & 1924 & 1628 & 2175 \\ \text { P } & 2126 & 2885 & 2895 & 1942 & 1750 & 2184 \\ \text { Subject } & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & & \\ \text { B } & 2114 & 2621 & 1843 & 2541 & & \\ \text { P } & 2164 & 2626 & 2006 & 2627 & & \end{array}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free