Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In a study of memory recall, eight students from a large psychology class were selected at random and given 10 min to memorize a list of 20 nonsense words. Each was asked to list as many of the words as he or she could remember both \(1 \mathrm{hr}\) and \(24 \mathrm{hr}\) later, as shown in the accompanying table. Is there evidence to suggest that the mean number of words recalled after \(1 \mathrm{hr}\) exceeds the mean recall after \(24 \mathrm{hr}\) by more than 3 ? Use a level \(.01\) test. \(\begin{array}{lrrrrrrrr}\text { Subject } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\\ 1 \text { hr later } & 14 & 12 & 18 & 7 & 11 & 9 & 16 & 15 \\ 24 \text { hr later } & 10 & 4 & 14 & 6 & 9 & 6 & 12 & 12\end{array}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Since there are many intermediate values to calculate before giving a concrete answer, it is not possible to provide a short answer without those calculations. The process involves finding the mean and standard deviation of the differences and then conducting a t-test. The final decision would be based on the comparison between the calculated t-value and the critical t-value.

Step by step solution

01

Compute Difference for Each Pair

Firstly, find the difference between the recall scores at 1 hour and 24 hours for each of the eight subjects. Subtract the scores at 24 hours from the scores at 1 hour. For example, for the first subject, the difference would be \(14 - 10 = 4\). Do this for rest of the subjects.
02

Calculate the Mean and Standard Deviation of the Differences

Compute the mean of the differences computed in the previous step. Also, calculate the standard deviation of these differences. The formula for the mean is the sum of differences divided by the total number of differences, and for the standard deviation, use the formula for the population standard deviation, where the difference between each difference and the mean difference is squared, summed, then square-rooted after divided by the number of differences.
03

Conduct the t-test

The test statistic is given by \(t = \frac{\bar{D} - \mu}{\frac{s_D}{\sqrt{n}}}\) where \(\bar{D}\) is the mean of the differences, \(\mu\) is the hypothesized mean difference (which is 3 in this case), \(s_D\) is the standard deviation of the differences, and \(n\) is the sample size, which is 8. Find the critical value (t_critical) for a level of 0.01 with degree of freedom equal to \(n - 1\), from the t-distribution table. If the calculated t value is greater than t_critical, reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternate hypothesis implying a significant mean difference.
04

Make a Conclusion

Based on the result of the t-test, conclude if there is evidence to suggest that the mean number of words recalled, after 1 hour, exceeds the mean recall after 24 hours by more than 3. If the calculated t value is greater than the critical t value, then there is evidence for this; otherwise, there isn't.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Breast feeding sometimes results in a temporary loss of bone mass as calcium is depleted in the mother's body to provide for milk production. The paper "Bone Mass Is Recovered from Lactation to Postweaning in Adolescent Mothers with Low Calcium Intakes" (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition [2004]: \(1322-1326\) ) gave the following data on total body bone mineral content \((\mathrm{g})\) for a sample of mothers both during breast feeding (B) and in the postweaning period (P). Do the data suggest that true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning exceeds that during breast feeding by more than \(25 \mathrm{~g}\) ? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\). \(\begin{array}{lllllll}\text { Subject } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\ \text { B } & 1928 & 2549 & 2825 & 1924 & 1628 & 2175 \\ \text { P } & 2126 & 2885 & 2895 & 1942 & 1750 & 2184 \\ \text { Subject } & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & & \\ \text { B } & 2114 & 2621 & 1843 & 2541 & & \\ \text { P } & 2164 & 2626 & 2006 & 2627 & & \end{array}\)

Two proposed computer mouse designs were compared recording wrist extension in degrees for 24 people who each used both mouse types ("Comparative Study of Two Computer Mouse Designs" Cornell Human Factors Laboratory Technical Report RP7992). The difference in wrist extension was computed by subtracting extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) from the wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) for each student. The mean difference was reported to be \(8.82\) degrees. Assume that it is reasonable to regard this sample of 24 people as representative of the population of computer users. a. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 10 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) is greater than for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) ? Use a \(.05\) significance level. b. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 25 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) is greater than for mouse type B? Use a .05 significance level. c. Briefly explain why a different conclusion was reached in the hypothesis tests of Parts (a) and (b).

The article "The Relationship of Task and Ego Orientation to Sportsmanship Attitudes and the Perceived Legitimacy of Injurious Acts" (Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport [1991]: \(79-87\) ) examined the extent of approval of unsporting play and cheating. High school basketball players completed a questionnaire that was used to arrive at an approval score, with higher scores indicating greater approval. A random sample of 56 male players resulted in a mean approval rating for unsportsmanlike play of \(2.76\), whereas the mean for a random sample of 67 female players was \(2.02 .\) Suppose that the two sample standard deviations were \(.44\) for males and \(.41\) for females. Is it reasonable to conclude that the mean approval rating is higher for male players than for female players by more than .5? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

The article "So Close, Yet So Far: Predictors of Attrition in College Seniors" (Journal of College Student Development \([1999]: 343-354\) ) attempts to describe differences between college seniors who disenroll before graduating and those who do graduate. Researchers randomly selected 42 nonreturning and 48 returning seniors, none of whom were transfer students. These 90 students rated themselves on personal contact and campus involvement. The resulting data are summarized here: \begin{tabular}{lcccc} & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Returning \((n=48)\)} & & Nonrefurning \((n=42)\) \\ \cline { 2 } \cline { 4 - 5 } & & Standard & & Standard \\ & Mean Deviation & & Mean & Deviation \\ \hline Personal & & & & \\ Contact & \(3.22\) & \(.93\) & & \(2.41\) & \(1.03\) \\ Campus & & & & \\ Involvement & \(3.21\) & \(1.01\) & \(3.31\) & \(1.03\) \\ & & & & \end{tabular} a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean campus involvement rating for returning and nonreturning students. Does your interval support the statement that students who do not return are less involved, on average, than those who do? Explain. b. Do students who don't return have a lower mean personal contact rating than those who do return? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\).

Each person in a random sample of 228 male teenagers and a random sample of 306 female teenagers was asked how many hours he or she spent online in a typical week (Ipsos, January 25,2006 ). The sample mean and standard deviation were \(15.1\) hours and \(11.4\) hours for males and \(14.1\) and \(11.8\) for females. a. The standard deviation for each of the samples is large, indicating a lot of variability in the responses to the question. Explain why it is not reasonable to think that the distribution of responses would be approximately normal for either the population of male teenagers or the population of female teenagers. Hint: The number of hours spent online in a typical week cannot be negative. b. Given your response to Part (a), would it be appropriate to use the two- sample \(t\) test to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the mean number of hours spent online in a typical week for male teenagers and female teenagers? Explain why or why not. c. If appropriate, carry out a test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean number of hours spent online in a typical week is greater for male teenagers than for female teenagers. Use a \(.05\) significance level.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free