Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The article "The Relationship of Task and Ego Orientation to Sportsmanship Attitudes and the Perceived Legitimacy of Injurious Acts" (Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport [1991]: \(79-87\) ) examined the extent of approval of unsporting play and cheating. High school basketball players completed a questionnaire that was used to arrive at an approval score, with higher scores indicating greater approval. A random sample of 56 male players resulted in a mean approval rating for unsportsmanlike play of \(2.76\), whereas the mean for a random sample of 67 female players was \(2.02 .\) Suppose that the two sample standard deviations were \(.44\) for males and \(.41\) for females. Is it reasonable to conclude that the mean approval rating is higher for male players than for female players by more than .5? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
To provide a short answer, we have to finish the t-test by comparing our computed t-score with the critical value. If t-score > \(t_{critical}\), the hypothesis that the mean approval for unsportsmanlike play is higher for males by more than 0.5 is upheld.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate the hypothesis

The null hypothesis (\(H0\)) would be that the difference between the two means is less than or equal to 0.5. The alternative hypothesis (\(Ha\)) is that the difference between the two means is more than 0.5. So, \(H0: \mu_m - \mu_f ≤ 0.5\) and \(Ha: \mu_m - \mu_f > 0.5\) where \(\mu_m\) and \(\mu_f\) are the mean approval ratings for males and females, respectively.
02

Perform the t-test

We need to apply the two-sample t-test for difference of means formula: \(t = \frac{(\bar{X}_m - \bar{X}_f) - (D0)}{\sqrt{\frac{s^2_m}{n_m} + \frac{s^2_f}{n_f}}}\), where \(\bar{X}_m = 2.76\) (mean of males), \(\bar{X}_f = 2.02\) (mean of females), \(D0 = 0.5\) (claimed difference), \(s_m = 0.44\) (standard deviation of males), \(n_m = 56\) (number of males), \(s_f = 0.41\) (standard deviation of females) and \(n_f = 67\) (number of females). Substituting these values into the formula gives us the t-score.
03

Determine the critical value and Conclusion

Check the t-table for a t-critical value with \(\alpha = 0.05\) for a one-tailed test and degrees of freedom \(DF = n_m + n_f - 2 = 56 + 67 - 2 = 121\). If the computed t-score is greater than \(t_{critical}\), then reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean approval rating is higher for male players than for female players by more than 0.5.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Are college students who take a freshman orientation course more or less likely to stay in college than those who do not take such a course? The article "A Longitudinal Study of the Retention and Academic Performance of Participants in Freshmen Orientation Courses" (Journal of College Student Development \([1994]: 444-\) 449) reported that 50 of 94 randomly selected students who did not participate in an orientation course returned for a second year. Of 94 randomly selected students who did take the orientation course, 56 returned for a second year. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\pi_{1}-\pi_{2}\), the difference in the proportion returning for students who do not take an orientation course and those who do. Give an interpretation of this interval.

An Associated Press article (San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune, September 23,1995 ) examined the changing attitudes of Catholic priests. National surveys of priests aged 26 to 35 were conducted in 1985 and again in 1993\. The priests surveyed were asked whether they agreed with the following statement: Celibacy should be a matter of personal choice for priests. In \(1985,69 \%\) of those surveyed agreed; in \(1993,38 \%\) agreed. Suppose that the samples were randomly selected and that the sample sizes were both 200 . Is there evidence that the proportion of priests who agreed that celibacy should be a matter of personal choice declined from 1985 to 1993 ? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

The article referenced in the previous exercise also reported that \(24 \%\) of the males and \(16 \%\) of the females in the 2006 sample reported owning an MP3 player. Suppose that there were the same number of males and females in the sample of 1112 . Do these data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of females that owned an MP3 player in 2006 is smaller than the corresponding proportion of males? Carry out a test using a significance level of 01 .

The positive effect of water fluoridation on dental health is well documented. One study that validates this is described in the article "Impact of Water Fluoridation on Children's Dental Health: A Controlled Study of Two Pennsylvania Communities" (American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section \([1981]:\) 262-265). Two communities were compared. One had adopted fluoridation in 1966, whereas the other had no such program. Of 143 randomly selected children from the town without fluoridated water, 106 had decayed teeth, and 67 of 119 randomly selected children from the town with fluoridated water had decayed teeth. Let \(\pi_{1}\) denote the true proportion of children drinking fluoridated water who have decayed teeth, and let \(\pi_{2}\) denote the analogous proportion for children drinking unfluoridated water. Estimate \(\pi_{1}-\pi_{2}\) using a \(90 \%\) confidence interval. Does the interval contain \(0 ?\) Interpret the interval.

"Doctors Praise Device That Aids Ailing Hearts" (Associated Press, November 9,2004 ) is the headline of an article that describes the results of a study of the effectiveness of a fabric device that acts like a support stocking for a weak or damaged heart. In the study, 107 people who consented to treatment were assigned at random to either a standard treatment consisting of drugs or the experimental treatment that consisted of drugs plus surgery to install the stocking. After two years, \(38 \%\) of the 57 patients receiving the stocking had improved and \(27 \%\) of the patients receiving the standard treatment had improved. Do these data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of patients who improve is higher for the experimental treatment than for the standard treatment? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free