Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

"Smartest People Often Dumbest About Sunburns" is the headline of an article that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (July 19,2006 ). The article states that "those with a college degree reported a higher incidence of sunburn that those without a high school degree43 percent versus 25 percent." For purposes of this exercise, suppose that these percentages were based on random samples of size 200 from each of the two groups of interest (college graduates and those without a high school degree). Is there convincing evidence that the proportion experiencing a sunburn is higher for college graduates than it is for those without a high school degree? Answer based on a test with a \(.05\) significance level.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Determine the test statistic \(Z\) using the given proportions and sample sizes, find the corresponding \(P\) -value. If the \(P\) -value is less than the significance level \(0.05\), we have enough evidence to say that the proportion of college graduates who experience sunburn is significantly higher than that of those without a high school degree.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Sample Sizes and Observed Proportions

The sample size for both groups is 200. The observed proportion of sunburn for the group with college degrees is 0.43 (43%) and for the group without a high school degree is 0.25 (25%).
02

State the Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) would state that there is no difference between the proportions i.e. the proportion of sunburn for college graduates equals the proportion for those without a high school degree. The alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)), which we are trying to provide evidence for, would state that the proportion of sunburn is higher for the college graduates than for those without the high school degree.
03

Compute the test statistic

The test statistic for a difference in proportions is the Z-statistic given by the formula: Z = \(\frac{{(\hat{p_1} - \hat{p_2}) - 0}}{{\sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})(\frac{1}{{n_1}}+\frac{1}{{n_2}})}}}\) where \(\hat{p_1}\) and \(\hat{p_2}\) are the sample proportions, n1 and n2 are the sample sizes, and \(\hat{p}\) is the pooled sample proportion given by \(\hat{p} = \frac{{\hat{p_1}n_1 + \hat{p_2}n_2}}{{n_1 + n_2}}\). For this exercise, we compute the test statistic using the given data.
04

Determine the P-value

The P-value is the probability of observing a sample statistic as extreme, or more so, than the one calculated given that the null hypothesis is true. It can be found using a standard normal (Z) distribution table or using software. If the computed P-value is less than the level of significance, we reject the null hypothesis - else we fail to reject.
05

Draw Conclusion

Based on the P-value, we decide if there's convincing evidence that the proportion experiencing a sunburn is higher for college graduates than it is for those without a high school degree. If the P-value < signifiacnce level, we reject the null hypothesis and support the alternative. Otherwise, we lack enough evidence to say for sure.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a study of memory recall, eight students from a large psychology class were selected at random and given 10 min to memorize a list of 20 nonsense words. Each was asked to list as many of the words as he or she could remember both \(1 \mathrm{hr}\) and \(24 \mathrm{hr}\) later, as shown in the accompanying table. Is there evidence to suggest that the mean number of words recalled after \(1 \mathrm{hr}\) exceeds the mean recall after \(24 \mathrm{hr}\) by more than 3 ? Use a level \(.01\) test. \(\begin{array}{lrrrrrrrr}\text { Subject } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\\ 1 \text { hr later } & 14 & 12 & 18 & 7 & 11 & 9 & 16 & 15 \\ 24 \text { hr later } & 10 & 4 & 14 & 6 & 9 & 6 & 12 & 12\end{array}\)

The article "Spray Flu Vaccine May Work Better Than Injections for Tots" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, May 2,2006 ) described a study that compared flu vaccine administered by injection and flu vaccine administered as a nasal spray. Each of the 8000 children under the age of 5 that participated in the study received both a nasal spray and an injection, but only one was the real vaccine and the other was salt water. At the end of the flu season, it was determined that \(3.9 \%\) of the 4000 children receiving the real vaccine by nasal spray got sick with the flu and \(8.6 \%\) of the 4000 receiving the real vaccine by injection got sick with the flu. a. Why would the researchers give every child both a nasal spray and an injection? b. Use the given data to estimate the difference in the proportion of children who get sick with the flu after being vaccinated with an injection and the proportion of children who get sick with the flu after being vaccinated with the nasal spray using a \(99 \%\) confidence interval. Based on the confidence interval, would you conclude that the proportion of children who get the flu is different for the two vaccination methods?

"Mountain Biking May Reduce Fertility in Men, Study Says" was the headline of an article appearing in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (December 3,2002 ). This conclusion was based on an Austrian study that compared sperm counts of avid mountain bikers (those who ride at least 12 hours per week) and nonbikers. Ninety percent of the avid mountain bikers studied had low sperm counts, as compared to \(26 \%\) of the nonbikers. Suppose that these percentages were based on independent samples of 100 avid mountain bikers and 100 nonbikers and that it is reasonable to view these samples as representative of Austrian avid mountain bikers and nonbikers. a. Do these data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of Austrian avid mountain bikers with low sperm count is higher than the proportion of Austrian nonbikers? b. Based on the outcome of the test in Part (a), is it reasonable to conclude that mountain biking 12 hours per week or more causes low sperm count? Explain.

Consider two populations for which \(\mu_{1}=30, \sigma_{1}=2\), \(\mu_{2}=25\), and \(\sigma_{2}=3\). Suppose that two independent random samples of sizes \(n_{1}=40\) and \(n_{2}=50\) are selected. Describe the approximate sampling distribution of \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) (center, spread, and shape).

An Associated Press article (San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune, September 23,1995 ) examined the changing attitudes of Catholic priests. National surveys of priests aged 26 to 35 were conducted in 1985 and again in 1993\. The priests surveyed were asked whether they agreed with the following statement: Celibacy should be a matter of personal choice for priests. In \(1985,69 \%\) of those surveyed agreed; in \(1993,38 \%\) agreed. Suppose that the samples were randomly selected and that the sample sizes were both 200 . Is there evidence that the proportion of priests who agreed that celibacy should be a matter of personal choice declined from 1985 to 1993 ? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free