Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Do girls think they don't need to take as many science classes as boys? The article "Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences" (Science Education [1999]: \(55-76\) ) gives information from a survey of children in grades 4,5, and \(6 .\) The 224 girls participating in the survey each indicated the number of science courses they intended to take in the future, and they also indicated the number of science courses they thought boys their age should take in the future. For each girl, the authors calculated the difference between the number of science classes she intends to take and the number she thinks boys should take. a. Explain why these data are paired. b. The mean of the differences was \(-.83\) (indicating girls intended, on average, to take fewer classes than they thought boys should take), and the standard deviation was 1.51. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean difference.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The data are paired because they come from the same subject: each girl. The 95% confidence interval for the mean difference between the number of science classes each girl plans to take and the number she thinks boys should take can partially be calculated with the given data as -0.83 ± 1.96*1.51. The negative mean difference indicates that girls on average plan to take fewer science classes than they think boys should, but the exact interval cannot be specified without the sample size.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Paired Data

Paired data usually involves cases where the data is collected on the same subjects, like here, the number of science classes the girls intend to take and the number they think boys should take. These are related to the same individual girl, thus they form pairs.
02

Confidence Interval Calculation

The formula to calculate a 95% confidence interval for the mean difference is given by \(\bar{X} ± Z_{\frac{α}{2}} × \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\), where \(\bar{X}\) is the sample mean (-0.83 in this case), \(Z_{\frac{α}{2}}\) is the Z score for the desired confidence level (1.96 for a 95% confidence level), \(s\) is the standard deviation (1.51 in this case), and \(n\) is the sample size. Since the sample size is not given, it cannot be incorporated into the formula. However, the other elements can be used to construct the confidence interval as follows: -0.83 ± 1.96*1.51.
03

Confidence Interval Interpretation

The resulting confidence interval estimates with 95% confidence the population mean difference between the number of science classes the girls intend to take and the number they think boys should take. The negative mean difference indicates that on average, girls intend to take fewer science classes than they think boys should take. However, without the sample size, the precise confidence interval cannot be determined.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a study of memory recall, eight students from a large psychology class were selected at random and given 10 min to memorize a list of 20 nonsense words. Each was asked to list as many of the words as he or she could remember both \(1 \mathrm{hr}\) and \(24 \mathrm{hr}\) later, as shown in the accompanying table. Is there evidence to suggest that the mean number of words recalled after \(1 \mathrm{hr}\) exceeds the mean recall after \(24 \mathrm{hr}\) by more than 3 ? Use a level \(.01\) test. \(\begin{array}{lrrrrrrrr}\text { Subject } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\\ 1 \text { hr later } & 14 & 12 & 18 & 7 & 11 & 9 & 16 & 15 \\ 24 \text { hr later } & 10 & 4 & 14 & 6 & 9 & 6 & 12 & 12\end{array}\)

An individual can take either a scenic route to work or a nonscenic route. She decides that use of the nonscenic route can be justified only if it reduces true average travel time by more than \(10 \mathrm{~min}\). a. If \(\mu_{1}\) refers to the scenic route and \(\mu_{2}\) to the nonscenic route, what hypotheses should be tested? b. If \(\mu_{1}\) refers to the nonscenic route and \(\mu_{2}\) to the scenic route, what hypotheses should be tested?

The article "Portable MP3 Player Ownership Reaches New High" (Ipsos Insight, June 29,2006 ) reported that in \(2006,20 \%\) of those in a random sample of 1112 Americans age 12 and older indicated that they owned an MP3 player. In a similar survey conducted in 2005 , only \(15 \%\) reported owning an MP3 player. Suppose that the 2005 figure was also based on a random sample of size 1112 . Estimate the difference in the proportion of Americans age 12 and older who owned an MP3 player in 2006 and the corresponding proportion for 2005 using a 95\% confidence interval. Is zero included in the interval? What does this tell you about the change in this proportion from 2005 to \(2006 ?\)

Olestra is a fat substitute approved by the FDA for use in snack foods. To investigate reports of gastrointestinal problems associated with olestra consumption, an experiment was carried out to compare olestra potato chips with regular potato chips ("Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following Consumption of Olestra or Regular Triglyceride Potato Chips," Journal of the American Medical Association \([1998]: 150-152\) ). Subjects were assigned at random to either the olestra chip group or the regular chip group. Of the 529 individuals in the regular chip group, 93 experienced gastrointestinal symptoms, whereas 90 of the 563 individuals in the olestra chip group experienced symptoms. Carry out a hypothesis test at the \(5 \%\) significance level to decide whether the proportion of individuals who experience symptoms after consuming olestra chips differs from the proportion who experience symptoms after consuming regular chips.

The article "The Sorority Rush Process: SelfSelection, Acceptance Criteria, and the Effect of Rejection" (Journal of College Student Development [1994]: \(346-353\) ) reported on a study of factors associated with the decision to rush a sorority. Fifty-four women who rushed a sorority and 51 women who did not were asked how often they drank alcoholic beverages. For the sorority rush group, the mean was \(2.72\) drinks per week and the standard deviation .86. For the group who did not rush, the mean was \(2.11\) and the standard deviation \(1.02 .\) Is there evidence to support the claim that those who rush a sorority drink more than those who do not rush? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\). What assumptions are required in order for the two-sample \(t\) test to be appropriate?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free