Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Duck hunting in populated areas faces opposition on the basis of safety and environmental issues. The San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune (June 18,1991 ) reported the results of a survey to assess public opinion regarding duck hunting on Morro Bay (located along the central coast of California). A random sample of 750 local residents included 560 who strongly opposed hunting on the bay. Does this sample provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the majority of local residents oppose hunting on Morro Bay? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
If the p-value will be smaller than \(\alpha = .01 \), we will conclude that there is sufficient evidence to say the majority of local residents oppose hunting on Morro Bay. If the p-value will bigger than \(\alpha = .01 \), we will conclude that there is not enough evidence to say the majority of residents oppose hunting on Morro Bay. However, without calculating the exact p-value based on the test statistic Z, it cannot be determined that whether we reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Setting up the Hypotheses

Since the problem is asking if the majority of residents oppose this means more than half the residents need to be opposing. Therefore, we set our Null Hypothesis ( \(H_0\) ) to state 'less than or equal to half the residents oppose hunting', and our Alternative Hypothesis ( \(H_1\) ) to state 'more than half the residents oppose hunting'. Therefore: \(H_0: p \leq 0.5\), \(H_1: p > 0.5\). Here, \(p\) is the population proportion of residents who oppose hunting on Morro Bay.
02

Computing the Test Statistic

Calculate the sample proportion, \( \hat{p} \), and use this to compute the test statistic. The sample proportion is: \( \hat{p} = \frac{560}{750} = 0.747\). The test statistic is computed as: \( Z = \frac{\hat{p}-p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0(1-p_0)}{n}}}\). Here, \(p_0\) is the hypothesized population proportion in the Null Hypothesis, and \(n\) is the sample size. Plugging in the values, we get: \( Z = \frac{0.747-0.5}{\sqrt{\frac{0.5(1-0.5)}{750}}}\).
03

Calculating the p-value

The calculation in step 2 has given us our test statistic Z. Now, we can use the typical normal distribution to calculate our p-value, which is the probability of getting a result as extreme, or more so, than our test statistic given that the null hypothesis is true. In most statistical calculators or packages, this value can be computed using a function often named as 'pnorm' or 'qnorm'.
04

Making the Decision

We compare the p-value with the significance level, \( \alpha = .01 \). If the p-value is less than \( \alpha \), we reject the null hypothesis. If the p-value is greater than \( \alpha \), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Newly purchased automobile tires of a certain type are supposed to be filled to a pressure of 30 psi. Let \(\mu\) denote the true average pressure. Find the \(P\) -value associated with each of the following given \(z\) statistic values for testing \(H_{0}: \mu=30\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu \neq 30\) when \(\sigma\) is known: a. \(2.10\) d. \(1.44\) b. \(-1.75\) e. \(-5.00\) c. \(0.58\)

The amount of shaft wear after a fixed mileage was determined for each of 7 randomly selected internal combustion engines, resulting in a mean of \(0.0372\) in. and a standard deviation of \(0.0125 \mathrm{in}\). a. Assuming that the distribution of shaft wear is normal, test at level \(.05\) the hypotheses \(H_{0}: \mu=.035\) versus \(H_{a}:\) \(\mu>.035\). b. Using \(\sigma=0.0125, \alpha=.05\), and Appendix Table 5 , what is the approximate value of \(\beta\), the probability of a Type II error, when \(\mu=.04\) ? c. What is the approximate power of the test when \(\mu=\) \(.04\) and \(\alpha=.05 ?\)

Although arsenic is known to be a poison, it also has some beneficial medicinal uses. In one study of the use of arsenic to treat acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a rare type of blood cell cancer, APL patients were given an arsenic compound as part of their treatment. Of those receiving arsenic, \(42 \%\) were in remission and showed no signs of leukemia in a subsequent examination (Washington Post, November 5,1998 ). It is known that \(15 \%\) of APL patients go into remission after the conventional treatment. Suppose that the study had included 100 randomly selected patients (the actual number in the study was much smaller). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion in remission for the arsenic treatment is greater than \(.15\), the remission proportion for the conventional treatment? Test the relevant hypotheses using a. 01 significance level.

Seat belts help prevent injuries in automobile accidents, but they certainly don't offer complete protection in extreme situations. A random sample of 319 front-seat occupants involved in head-on collisions in a certain region resulted in 95 people who sustained no injuries ("Influencing Factors on the Injury Severity of Restrained Front Seat Occupants in Car-to-Car Head-on Collisions," Accident Analysis and Prevention \([1995]: 143-150\) ). Does this suggest that the true (population) proportion of uninjured occupants exceeds .25? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\).

An automobile manufacturer who wishes to advertise that one of its models achieves \(30 \mathrm{mpg}\) (miles per gallon) decides to carry out a fuel efficiency test. Six nonprofessional drivers are selected, and each one drives a car from Phoenix to Los Angeles. The resulting fuel efficiencies (in miles per gallon) are: \(\begin{array}{llllll}27.2 & 29.3 & 31.2 & 28.4 & 30.3 & 29.6\end{array}\) Assuming that fuel efficiency is normally distributed under these circumstances, do the data contradict the claim that true average fuel efficiency is (at least) \(30 \mathrm{mpg}\) ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free