Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The authors of the article "Perceived Risks of Heart Disease and Cancer Among Cigarette Smokers" (Journal of the American Medical Association [1999]: \(1019-1021\) ) expressed the concem that a majority of smokers do not view themselves as being at increased risk of heart disease or cancer. A study of 737 current smokers selected at random from U.S. households with telephones found that of 737 smokers surveyed, 295 indicated that they believed they have a higher than average risk of cancer. Do these data suggest that \(\pi\), the true proportion of smokers who view themselves as being at increased risk of cancer is in fact less than .5, as claimed by the authors of the paper? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
To conclude, compare the test statistic with the critical value. If 'z' (test statistic) < -1.645 (critical value) then, the null hypothesis is rejected concluding that the proportion is indeed less than 0.5.

Step by step solution

01

- Setup the Hypothesis

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is that the proportion of smokers who view themselves at higher risk of cancer is 0.5. The alternate hypothesis (\(H_a\)) is that the proportion is less than 0.5.\nFormally, we can say:\n\nNull Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): \(\pi = 0.5\) \n\nAlternate Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): \(\pi < 0.5\)
02

- Calculate Test Statistic

In this case we have to use a one-sample proportion z-test. The test statistic (z) is given by the formula:\n\(z = \frac{(p - \pi)}{\sqrt{\frac{\pi*(1-\pi)}{n}}}\) Where:- \(p\) is the sample proportion = 295/737 = 0.4,- \(\pi\) is the proportion in the null hypothesis = 0.5- \(n\) is the number of trials = 737.Substituting the values into the formula gives us:\(z = \frac{(0.4 - 0.5)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.5*0.5}{737}}}\)
03

- Critical Value and Decision Rule

The decision rule for this test at the 0.05 significance level is to reject the null hypothesis if the test statistic is less than the critical value at \(\alpha=0.05\). In this case, the critical value for a one-tailed test at \(\alpha=0.05\) is approximately -1.645.
04

- Conclusion of Hypothesis Test

After calculating the test statistic ('z'), compare it with the critical value. If the test statistic is less than the critical value, then reject the null hypothesis, concluding there is enough evidence to say that the proportion of smokers who view themselves as at higher risk of cancer is less than 0.5.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Researchers at the University of Washington and Harvard University analyzed records of breast cancer screening and diagnostic evaluations ("Mammogram Cancer Scares More Frequent than Thought," USA Today, April 16,1998 ). Discussing the benefits and downsides of the screening process, the article states that, although the rate of false-positives is higher than previously thought, if radiologists were less aggressive in following up on suspicious tests, the rate of false-positives would fall but the rate of missed cancers would rise. Suppose that such a screening test is used to decide between a null hypothesis of \(H_{0}:\) no cancer is present and an alternative hypothesis of \(H_{a}:\) cancer is present. (Although these are not hypotheses about a population characteristic, this exercise illustrates the definitions of Type I and Type II errors.) a. Would a false-positive (thinking that cancer is present when in fact it is not) be a Type I error or a Type II error? b. Describe a Type I error in the context of this problem, and discuss the consequences of making a Type I error. c. Describe a Type II error in the context of this problem, and discuss the consequences of making a Type II error. d. What aspect of the relationship between the probability of Type I and Type II errors is being described by the statement in the article that if radiologists were less aggressive in following up on suspicious tests, the rate of false-positives would fall but the rate of missed cancers would rise?

A county commissioner must vote on a resolution that would commit substantial resources to the construction of a sewer in an outlying residential area. Her fiscal decisions have been criticized in the past, so she decides to take a survey of constituents to find out whether they favor spending money for a sewer system. She will vote to appropriate funds only if she can be fairly certain that a majority of the people in her district favor the measure. What hypotheses should she test?

10.25 Pairs of \(P\) -values and significance levels, \(\alpha\), are given. For each pair, state whether the observed \(P\) -value leads to rejection of \(H_{0}\) at the given significance level. a. \(P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.05\) b. \(P\) -value \(=.003, \alpha=.001\) c. \(P\) -value \(=.498, \alpha=.05\) d. \(P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.10\) e. \(P\) -value \(=.039, \alpha=.01\) f. \(P\) -value \(=.218, \alpha=.10\)

Duck hunting in populated areas faces opposition on the basis of safety and environmental issues. The San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune (June 18,1991 ) reported the results of a survey to assess public opinion regarding duck hunting on Morro Bay (located along the central coast of California). A random sample of 750 local residents included 560 who strongly opposed hunting on the bay. Does this sample provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the majority of local residents oppose hunting on Morro Bay? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\).

The power of a test is influenced by the sample size and the choice of significance level. a. Explain how increasing the sample size affects the power (when significance level is held fixed). b. Explain how increasing the significance level affects the power (when sample size is held fixed).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free