Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In an AP-AOL sports poll (Associated Press, December 18,2005 ), 272 of 394 randomly selected baseball fans stated that they thought the designated hitter rule should either be expanded to both baseball leagues or eliminated. Based on the given information, is there sufficient evidence to conclude that a majority of baseball fans feel this way?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The steps involve hypothesis testing where a null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis is defined based on the given statement. A test statistic is calculated and the obtained p-value is compared with the significance level to arrive at a conclusion if there is substantial evidence to believe that a majority of baseball fans feel a certain way about the designated hitter rule.

Step by step solution

01

Establish the Null and Alternative Hypotheses

In order to conduct a hypothesis test, first establish the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) can be that the proportion of baseball fans who believe the designated hitter rule should either be expanded to both leagues or eliminated is less than or equal to 0.5 (50%), that means, there's not a majority. The alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)), which we are trying to gather evidence to support, can be that the proportion is greater than 0.5 (50%), meaning there's a majority.
02

Test Statistic Calculation

Now calculate the test statistic, which is the sample proportion minus the population proportion in the null hypothesis, divided by the standard error. The sample proportion (\( \hat{p} \)) is 272 out of 394, which is approximately 0.690. The standard error (\( SE \)) of a proportion under the Central Limit Theorem is \(\sqrt{\frac{{(P)(1-P)}}{n}}\) where \(P\) is the assumed population proportion and \(n\) is the sample size. Here, \(P\) is 0.5 and \(n\) is 394, thus the standard error is approximately 0.025.
03

P-Value Calculation

After obtaining the test statistic, the next step is to calculate the P-value. The P-value is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the one calculated under the null hypothesis. Given that the test statistic follows a normal distribution, we can utilize a standard normal Z-table or software to get the P-value. As the test is one-tailed (greater than 0.5), find the one-tailed P-value.
04

Conclusion

Finally, make a conclusion based on the P-value. In general, if the P-value is less than the significance level (0.05), reject the null hypothesis. If the P-value is greater than the significance level, do not reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Water samples are taken from water used for cooling as it is being discharged from a power plant into a river. It has been determined that as long as the mean temperature of the discharged water is at most \(150^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), there will be no negative effects on the river's ecosystem. To investigate whether the plant is in compliance with regulations that prohibit a mean discharge water temperature above \(150^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), researchers will take 50 water samples at randomly selected times and record the temperature of each sample. The resulting data will be used to test the hypotheses \(H_{0}: \mu=150^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu>150^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). In the context of this example, describe Type I and Type II errors. Which type of error would you consider more serious? Explain.

A well-designed and safe workplace can contribute greatly to increasing productivity. It is especially important that workers not be asked to perform tasks, such as lifting, that exceed their capabilities. The following data on maximum weight of lift (MWOL, in kilograms) for a frequency of 4 lifts per minute were reported in the article "The Effects of Speed, Frequency, and Load on Measured Hand Forces for a Floor-to-Knuckle Lifting Task" (Ergonomics \([1992]: 833-843)\) : \(\begin{array}{lllll}25.8 & 36.6 & 26.3 & 21.8 & 27.2\end{array}\) Suppose that it is reasonable to regard the sample as a random sample from the population of healthy males, age \(18-30\). Do the data suggest that the population mean MWOL exceeds 25 ? Carry out a test of the relevant hypotheses using a \(.05\) significance level.

Use the definition of the \(P\) -value to explain the following: a. Why \(H_{0}\) would certainly be rejected if \(P\) -value \(=.0003\) b. Why \(H_{0}\) would definitely not be rejected if \(P\) -value \(=\) \(.350\)

Many people have misconceptions about how profitable small, consistent investments can be. In a survey of 1010 randomly selected U.S. adults (Associated Press, October 29,1999 ), only 374 responded that they thought that an investment of \(\$ 25\) per week over 40 years with a \(7 \%\) annual return would result in a sum of over \(\$ 100,000\) (the correct amount is \(\$ 286,640\) ). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that less than \(40 \%\) of U.S. adults are aware that such an investment would result in a sum of over \(\$ 100,000\) ? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\).

According to the article "Workaholism in Organizations: Gender Differences" (Sex Roles [1999]: \(333-346\) ), the following data were reported on 1996 income for random samples of male and female MBA graduates from a certain Canadian business school: \begin{tabular}{lccc} & \(\boldsymbol{N}\) & \(\overline{\boldsymbol{x}}\) & \(\boldsymbol{s}\) \\ \hline Males & 258 & \(\$ 133,442\) & \(\$ 131,090\) \\ Females & 233 & \(\$ 105,156\) & \(\$ 98,525\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} Note: These salary figures are in Canadian dollars. a. Test the hypothesis that the mean salary of male MBA graduates from this school was in excess of \(\$ 100,000\) in \(1996 .\) b. Is there convincing evidence that the mean salary for all female MBA graduates is above \(\$ 100,000 ?\) Test using \(\alpha=.10\) c. If a significance level of \(.05\) or \(.01\) were used instead of \(.10\) in the test of Part (b), would you still reach the same conclusion? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free