Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain why the statement \(\bar{x}=50\) is not a legitimate hypothesis.

Short Answer

Expert verified
\(\bar{x}=50\) is not a credible hypothesis since it refers to a sample mean. Hypotheses should be made about population parameters. The correct hypothesis could be \(\mu=50\), where \(\mu\) signifies the population mean.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding hypotheses

A legitimate hypothesis in statistics must be a testable claim about a population parameter, such as the population mean (\(\mu\)), the population proportion (p), the population standard deviation (\(\sigma\)), among others.
02

Wrong reference

\(\bar{x}=50\) is not a legitimate hypothesis as it is a statement about a sample mean, not a population parameter. A sample mean is subject to variability and depends on the specific sample chosen.
03

Right reference

If you want to make a legitimate hypothesis, it should instead refer to a population parameter. For example, a correct hypothesis could be \(\mu=50\), where \(\mu\) represents the population mean.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Seat belts help prevent injuries in automobile accidents, but they certainly don't offer complete protection in extreme situations. A random sample of 319 front-seat occupants involved in head-on collisions in a certain region resulted in 95 people who sustained no injuries ("Influencing Factors on the Injury Severity of Restrained Front Seat Occupants in Car-to-Car Head-on Collisions," Accident Analysis and Prevention \([1995]: 143-150\) ). Does this suggest that the true (population) proportion of uninjured occupants exceeds .25? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\).

In a national survey of 2013 adults, 1590 responded that lack of respect and courtesy in American society is a serious problem, and 1283 indicated that they believe that rudeness is a more serious problem than in past years (Associated Press, April 3,2002 ). Is there convincing evidence that more than three-quarters of U.S. adults believe that rudeness is a worsening problem? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\).

The article "Theaters Losing Out to Living Rooms" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, June 17,2005 ) states that movie attendance declined in 2005 . The Associated Press found that 730 of 1000 randomly selected adult Americans preferred to watch movies at home rather than at a movie theater. Is there convincing evidence that the majority of adult Americans prefer to watch movies at home? Test the relevant hypotheses using a \(.05\) significance level.

In a representative sample of 1000 adult Americans, only 430 could name at least one justice who is currently serving on the U.S. Supreme Court (Ipsos, January 10,2006 ). Using a significance level of \(.01\), carry out ? hypothesis test to determine if there is convincing evidence to support the claim that fewer than half of adult Americans can name at least one justice currently serving on the Supreme Court.

The article referenced in Exercise \(10.34\) also reported that 470 of 1000 randomly selected adult Americans thought that the quality of movies being produced was getting worse. a. Is there convincing evidence that fewer than half of adult Americans believe that movie quality is getting worse? Use a significance level of \(.05\). b. Suppose that the sample size had been 100 instead of 1000 , and that 47 thought that the movie quality was getting worse (so that the sample proportion is still . 47 ). Based on this sample of 100 , is there convincing evidence that fewer than half of adult Americans believe that movie quality is getting worse? Use a significance level of \(.05\). c. Write a few sentences explaining why different conclusions were reached in the hypothesis tests of Parts (a) and (b).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free