Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

True/false: If you are making 4 comparisons between means, then based on the Bonferroni correction, you should use an alpha level of .01 for each test.

Short Answer

Expert verified
False, the adjusted alpha level should be 0.0125, not 0.01.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Bonferroni Correction

The Bonferroni correction is used when conducting multiple statistical tests to reduce the chances of obtaining false positives (Type I errors). It adjusts the significance level (alpha) for each individual test to control the overall Type I error rate.
02

Calculate the Adjusted Alpha Level

According to the Bonferroni correction, the adjusted alpha level for each test is calculated by dividing the original alpha level by the number of tests. If the original alpha level is 0.05 and there are 4 comparisons, calculate it as follows: \[ \text{Adjusted alpha} = \frac{0.05}{4} = 0.0125 \].
03

Compare with the Stated Alpha Level

The problem states an alpha level of 0.01 for each test. Compare the calculated adjusted alpha (0.0125) with the stated alpha level (0.01) to determine if they match. Since 0.0125 is greater than 0.01, the provided statement does not hold true.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Type I error
A Type I error occurs in statistical hypothesis testing when we incorrectly reject a true null hypothesis. In simpler terms, it's a false alarm. We think there's an effect or a difference when there actually isn't one. This type of error is a major concern in experiments and studies, as it can lead researchers to draw incorrect conclusions. To prevent such mistakes, statisticians use a significance level (alpha), often set at 0.05, which indicates that there's a 5% risk of making a Type I error. This means, if the data suggests that a finding is statistically significant, there's a 5% chance that this finding could be simply due to random chance rather than a true effect. This becomes particularly important in studies with multiple comparisons, because with each test, the likelihood of encountering at least one Type I error increases.
Adjusted Alpha Level
The adjusted alpha level is a recalculated significance threshold used in multiple testing to control the overall risk of Type I errors. When making multiple comparisons, the probability of making at least one Type I error across all tests rises. This is where methods like the Bonferroni correction come into play.

Significance Level Adjustment

The Bonferroni correction adjusts the alpha level (\( ext{original alpha} \), typically 0.05) by dividing it by the number of comparisons (tests) being conducted.For instance, if you have four comparisons, the adjusted alpha is calculated as:\[ \text{Adjusted alpha} = rac{0.05}{4} = 0.0125 \]Using this adjusted alpha helps maintain the overall risk of Type I errors across all tests at the desired level, ensuring that any individual test result remains statistically reliable.
Multiple Comparisons
In research, it is common to conduct several comparisons at once, which is referred to as multiple comparisons. These arise when researchers want to test different hypotheses simultaneously or compare more than two groups. While beneficial for gathering comprehensive insights, multiple comparisons increase the risk of encountering Type I errors.

Risk Management

Without adjusting the alpha level, the overall error rate would skyrocket with each additional test, making it very likely to find a false positive somewhere among the results. By using methods like the Bonferroni correction, researchers manage this risk by reducing the alpha level applied to each test. This adjustment helps to ensure that the collective statistical findings remain robust and reliable while keeping a lid on Type I errors. For example, if you have 4 tests and you use a typical alpha of 0.05 for each, you'd be almost guaranteed to mistakenly reject a true null hypothesis at least once. Adjusting the alpha level addresses this issue by ensuring that the likelihood of such an error stays within an acceptable range across the study.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The sampling distribution of a statistic is normally distributed with an estimated standard error of \(12(\mathrm{df}=20)\). (a) What is the probability that you would have gotten a mean of 107 (or more extreme) if the population parameter were \(100 ?\) Is this probability significant at the .05 level (two- tailed)? (b) What is the probability that you would have gotten a mean of 95 or less (one-tailed)? Is this probability significant at the .05 level? You may want to use the t Distribution calculator for this problem.

In an experiment, participants were divided into 4 groups. There were 20 participants in each group, so the degrees of freedom (error) for this study was \(80-4=76\). Tukey's HSD test was performed on the data. (a) Calculate the \(\mathrm{p}\) value for each pair based on the \(\mathrm{Q}\) value given below. You will want to use the Studentized Range Calculator. (b) Which differences are significant at the .05 level? $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline {\text { Comparison of Groups }} & \mathrm{Q} \\ \hline \mathrm{A}-\mathrm{B} & 3.4 \\ \hline \mathrm{A}-\mathrm{C} & 3.8 \\ \hline \mathrm{A}-\mathrm{D} & 4.3 \\ \hline \mathrm{B}-\mathrm{C} & 1.7 \\ \hline \mathrm{B}-\mathrm{D} & 3.9 \\ \hline \mathrm{C}-\mathrm{D} & 3.7 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Below are data showing the results of six subjects on a memory test. The three scores per subject are their scores on three trials \((\mathrm{a}, \mathrm{b},\) and \(\mathrm{c})\) of a memory task. Are the subjects get- ting better each trial? Test the linear effect of trial for the data. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline a & b & c \\ \hline 4 & 6 & 7 \\ \hline 3 & 7 & 8 \\ \hline 2 & 8 & 5 \\ \hline 1 & 4 & 7 \\ \hline 4 & 6 & 9 \\ \hline 2 & 4 & 2 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Compute \(L\) for each subject using the contrast weights \(-1,0,\) and \(1 .\) That is, compute \((-1)(a)+(0)(b)+(1)(c)\) for each subject. b. Compute a one-sample t-test on this column (with the \(L\) values for each subject) you created.

You perform a one-sample t test and calculate a t statistic of 3.0 . The mean of your sample was 1.3 and the standard deviation was \(2.6 .\) How many participants were used in this study?

A (hypothetical) experiment is conducted on the effect of alcohol on perceptual motor ability. Ten subjects are each tested twice, once after having two drinks and once after having two glasses of water. The two tests were on two different days to give the alcohol a chance to wear off. Half of the subjects were given alcohol first and half were given water first. The scores of the 10 subjects are shown below. The first number for each subject is their per- formance in the "water" condition. Higher scores reflect better performance. Test to see if alcohol had a significant effect. Report the \(\mathrm{t}\) and \(\mathrm{p}\) values. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { water } & \text { alcohol } \\ \hline 16 & 13 \\ \hline 15 & 13 \\ \hline 11 & 10 \\ \hline 20 & 18 \\ \hline 19 & 17 \\ \hline 14 & 11 \\ \hline 13 & 10 \\ \hline 15 & 15 \\ \hline 14 & 11 \\ \hline 16 & 16 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free