Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If 36 measurements of the specific gravity of aluminum had a mean of 2.705 and a standard deviation of .028 , find the point estimate for the actual specific gravity of aluminum and calculate the margin of error.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The point estimate for the actual specific gravity of aluminum is 2.705, and the margin of error is approximately 0.00915.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the given values

From the given exercise, we have the following: - Sample size (n) = 36 - Sample mean (x̄) = 2.705 - Sample standard deviation (s) = 0.028
02

Calculate the point estimate

Since the point estimate is the same as the sample mean, we already have it: Point estimate = x̄ = 2.705
03

Find the critical z-value

To find the critical z-value, we need to use a standard normal distribution table. Since we want to be 95% confident, we can use the z-value corresponding to 97.5%, which is the value halfway between 95% and 100%. Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find that: Critical z-value = 1.96
04

Calculate the margin of error

Now, we can use the critical z-value, sample standard deviation, and sample size to calculate the margin of error using the following formula: Margin of error = Critical z-value * (s / √n) Margin of error = 1.96 * (0.028 / √36) Margin of error = 1.96 * (0.028 / 6) Margin of error = 1.96 * 0.00467 Margin of error ≈ 0.00915 So, the point estimate for the actual specific gravity of aluminum is 2.705, and the margin of error is approximately 0.00915.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Specific Gravity of Aluminum
Understanding the concept of specific gravity is crucial when working with different materials. Specific gravity, often symbolized as SG, is a dimensionless quantity that defines the ratio of the density of a substance to the density of a reference substance, typically water at 4 °C, where water has a density of 1 g/cm³. For metals like aluminum, the SG tells us how heavy the metal is compared to water.

For aluminum, which is known for being lightweight yet strong, the specific gravity is an important factor in industries such as aerospace and construction. If an object made of aluminum is submerged in water, the SG can predict whether it will sink or float. A lower SG indicates that the metal is lighter than water. The exercise you provided gives us a mean specific gravity of 2.705 from 36 measurements. This means that aluminum is approximately 2.705 times as dense as water, showing that despite its lightweight reputation, it will sink in water due to its higher density.
Sample Standard Deviation
The sample standard deviation (s) is a measure of the amount of variation or dispersion of a set of values. A low standard deviation indicates that the values tend to be close to the mean of the set, while a high standard deviation indicates that the values are spread out over a wider range.

In the context of our aluminum measurements, a sample standard deviation of 0.028 signifies that the individual measurements of the specific gravity of aluminum are fairly close to the sample mean of 2.705. This informs us that the sample is consistent with relatively small deviations from the mean, indicating precision in the measurements. It's crucial for students to understand how to calculate and interpret the standard deviation as it serves as the foundation for many other statistical analyses, including the establishment of the margin of error in our given problem.
Critical Z-Value
The critical z-value plays an essential role in hypothesis testing and constructing confidence intervals. It represents the number of standard deviations a data point must be from the mean in order to be considered unusual or surprising in a standard normal distribution.

For a commonly desired confidence level of 95%, the critical z-value helps determine the margin of error for the confidence interval. The value of 1.96, which we get from statistical tables or tools, corresponds to the required z-score that encapsulates the central 95% of the normal distribution. It indicates that we are 95% confident that the true mean (in this case, the actual specific gravity of aluminum) lies within 1.96 standard deviations of our sample mean. This is the foundation for calculating the margin of error which gives us a range where the true mean is likely to fall.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

More Confidence Intervals For the confidence intervals given in Exercises \(7-10,\) can you conclude that there is a difference between \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) ? Explain. $$136.2<\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}<137.3$$

Find the z-values needed to calculate large-sample confidence intervals for the confidence levels given. Confidence coefficient \(1-\alpha=.98\)

Using the sample information given in Exercises \(22-23,\) give the best point estimate for the binomial proportion \(p\) and calculate the margin of error. A random sample of \(n=500\) observations from a binomial population produced \(x=450\) successes.

Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the population means. Then find a point estimate for the difference in the population means and calculate the margin of error: Compare your results. Can you conclude that there is a difference in the two population means? $$\begin{aligned}&\text { } n_{1}=n_{2}=50, \bar{x}_{1}=125.2, \bar{x}_{2}=123.7, s_{1}=5.6\\\ &s_{2}=6.8\end{aligned}$$

College graduates with STEM majors have starting salaries that appear to be much better than those in non-STEM majors. \({ }^{14}\) Starting salaries for 50 randomly selected graduates in electrical engineering and 50 randomly selected graduates in computer science were compiled with the information that follows. $$\begin{array}{lccc}\hline & & \text { Standard } & \text { Sample } \\\\\text { Field } & \text { Mean } & \text { Deviation } & \text { Size } \\\\\hline \text { Electrical engineering } & \$ 62,428 & \$ 12,500 & 50 \\\\\text { Computer science } & \$ 57,762 & \$ 13,330 & 50 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ a. What is the point estimate of the mean difference between starting salaries for electrical engineers and computer scientists? b. Find a \(95 \%\) lower confidence bound for the mean difference between starting salaries for electrical engineers and computer scientists. Does it appear that electrical engineers have a higher starting salary than computer scientists?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free