Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Use the information given in Exercises \(4-7\) to calculate Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, where \(x_{i}\) and \(y_{i}\) are the ranks of the ith pair of observations and \(d_{i}=x_{i}-y_{i} .\) Assume that there are no ties in the ranks. \(d_{i}=\\{-6,-3,-3,-4,2,5,5,4\\}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the given differences between the ranks of pairs of observations, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient is calculated to be approximately 0.7917.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the sum of squared differences

First, we need to calculate the sum of squared differences, \(D^2\). We are given the differences \(d_i\) and we square each of them and sum them up. So, \(D^2 = (-6)^2 + (-3)^2 + (-3)^2 + (-4)^2 + 2^2 + 5^2 + 5^2 + 4^2 = 36 + 9 + 9 + 16 + 4 + 25 + 25 + 16 = 140\).
02

Calculate Spearman's rank correlation coefficient

Now that we have \(D^2\), we can calculate the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, \(r_s\). We are given that there are 8 pairs of observations, so \(n = 8\). We can plug the values into the formula: \(r_s = 1 - \frac{6(140)}{8(8^2 - 1)} = 1 - \frac{840}{4032} = 1 - 0.2083 = 0.7917\). So, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient is approximately \(0.7917\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation Analysis
Correlation analysis involves determining the strength and direction of the statistical relationship between two continuous variables. It's a common tool in statistical data analysis which helps in understanding how changes in one variable might be associated with changes in another.

For instance, in the context of the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, we're interested in assessing if there's a monotonic relationship between two ranked variables. This means we're looking for a consistent tendency for the ranks of one variable to increase as the ranks of the other increase, or conversely, to decrease as the other increases. It's important to note that correlation doesn't imply causation; it merely indicates a potential relationship for further analysis.

Correlation coefficients range from -1 to 1. A value of 1 implies a perfect positive relationship, -1 a perfect negative relationship, and 0 no relationship at all. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient expressed in the original exercise (\( r_s = 0.7917 \)) suggests a strong positive correlation between the two ranked variables.
Non-Parametric Statistics
Non-parametric statistics are used when data doesn't necessarily come from a distribution that can be easily categorized or when the sample sizes are small. Unlike parametric statistics which require the data to follow a certain distribution (often normal distribution), non-parametric methods are 'distribution-free' and rely on fewer assumptions.

With non-parametric methods such as the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, you don't need to worry about the data being normally distributed. This is particularly helpful when dealing with skewed distributions or ordinal data where values are ranked but not evenly spaced. The calculation based on ranked data provides a measure that is more robust to outliers and can be more reflective of non-linear relationships.

As exemplified in the exercise solution, we don't need to know the actual values of the observations, only their rank and the differences in rank, which makes Spearman's coefficient a powerful tool in non-parametric statistical analysis.
Rank Correlation
Rank correlation measures the degree of similarity between two sets of ranks given to the same set of objects. It's used when the data does not meet the requirements of parametric correlation methods, such as Pearson's coefficient.

In the step by step solution, we see how we can use ranks to find a correlation. Rather than using raw data, we assess how the order of the data points compares between two variables. This approach not only simplifies calculations when dealing with complicated raw scores but also mitigates the effect of outliers and non-normal distributions.

The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, which is the focus of this problem, is a commonly used measure of rank correlation. It's particularly favored when data is ranked but intervals between rank positions are not equal or when ordinal data is involved.
Statistical Data Analysis
Statistical data analysis encompasses a wide array of techniques for exploring, describing, and inferring conclusions from data. It is fundamental in making sense of numerical information and guiding decision-making based on empirical evidence.

In the given problem, the statistical data analysis involves the use of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient to analyze the relationship between two sets of ranks. This is a small piece of what statistical data analysis entails - it can range from simple measures of central tendency like mean and median to complex inferential statistics used to predict and make inferences about a population based on samples.

The process in the exercise also highlights the iterative nature of data analysis, where calculations build upon previous steps, showcasing how analysis is often a step-by-step process to ensure accuracy and understanding along the way.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two art critics each ranked 10 paintings by contemporary (but anonymous) artists according to their appeal to the respective critics. The ratings are shown in the table. Do the critics seem to agree on their ratings of contemporary art? That is, do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a positive association between critics \(A\) and \(B ?\) Test by using an \(\alpha\) value near. \(05 .\) $$\begin{array}{ccc}\hline \text { Painting } & \text { Critic } \mathrm{A} & \text { Critic B } \\\\\hline 1 & 6 & 5 \\\2 & 4 & 6 \\\3 & 9 & 10 \\\4 & 1 & 2 \\\5 & 2 & 3 \\\6 & 7 & 8 \\\7 & 3 & 1\end{array}$$ $$\begin{array}{ccc}\hline \text { Painting } & \text { Critic A } & \text { Critic B } \\\\\hline 8 & 8 & 7 \\\9 & 5 & 4 \\\10 & 10 & 9 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$

Calculate the p-value for the test. What is your conclusion with \(\alpha=.05 ?\) Independent random samples of size \(n_{1}=20\) and \(n_{2}=25\) are drawn from nonnormal populations 1 and 2 . The value of \(T_{1}=252\). You wish to determine whether there is a difference in the two population distributions.

Advertising Campaigns The results of an investigation of product recognition following three advertising campaigns were reported in Example \(11.15 .\) The responses were the percentage adults in 15 different groups who were familiar with the newly advertised product. The normal probability plot indicated that the data were not approximately normal and another method of analysis should be used. Is there a significant difference among the three population distributions from which these samples came? Use an appropriate nonparametric method to answer this question. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \text { Campaign } & \\ \hline 1 & 2 & 3 \\ \hline 33 & .28 & 21 \\ .29 & .41 & 30 \\ 21 & .34 & 26 \\ 32 & .39 & .33 \\ .25 & .27 & .31 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

The information in Exercises 5-6 refers to a paired-difference experiment. Analyze the data using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. State the null and alternative hypotheses to be tested and calculate the test statistic. Find the rejection region for \(\alpha=.05\) and state your conclusions. \(\left[\right.\) NOTE \(\left.: T^{+}+T^{-}=n(n+1) / 2 .\right]\) Test for a difference in the two distributions when \(n=30\) and \(T^{+}=249\)

Word-Association Experiments A comparison of reaction times for two different stimuli in a word-association experiment produced the accompanying results when applied to a random sample of 16 people: Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in mean reaction times for the two stimuli? Use the Wilcoxon rank sum test and explain your conclusions.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free