Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Two Simple Examples Use the sign test to compare two populations for significant differences for the paired data. State the null and alternative hypotheses to be tested. Determine an appropriate rejection region with \(\alpha \leq .10 .\) Calculate the observed value of the test statistic and present your conclusion. $$ \begin{array}{cccccccc} & &&& {\text { Pair }} \\ \hline \text { Population } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 \\ \hline 1 & 8.9 & 8.1 & 9.3 & 7.7 & 10.4 & 8.3 & 7.4 \\ 2 & 8.8 & 7.4 & 9.0 & 7.8 & 9.9 & 8.1 & 6.9 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
#tag_title# Short answer The null hypothesis states that there is no significant difference between the medians of the two populations, while the alternative hypothesis states that there is a significant difference. After applying the sign test and comparing the observed test statistic (T = 1) with the critical value (Tα = 0), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means we do not have enough evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between the medians of the two populations.

Step by step solution

01

Null hypothesis (H0)

The null hypothesis states that there is no significant difference between the medians of the two populations: \(H_0: M_1 - M_2 = 0\)
02

Alternative hypothesis (H1)

The alternative hypothesis states that there is a significant difference between the medians of the two populations: \(H_1: M_1 - M_2 \neq 0\) #Step 2: Calculate the differences for each pair#
03

Calculating the differences

For each pair, we need to calculate the difference between the values of population 1 and population 2: Pair 1: \(8.9 - 8.8 = 0.1\) Pair 2: \(8.1 - 7.4 = 0.7\) Pair 3: \(9.3 - 9.0 = 0.3\) Pair 4: \(7.7 - 7.8 = -0.1\) Pair 5: \(10.4 - 9.9 = 0.5\) Pair 6: \(8.3 - 8.1 = 0.2\) Pair 7: \(7.4 - 6.9 = 0.5\) #Step 3: Count the positive and negative differences#
04

Counting positive and negative differences

We will count the number of positive and negative differences: Positive differences: 6 Negative differences: 1 #Step 4: Determine the observed value of the test statistic#
05

Observed value of the test statistic (T)

In the sign test, the observed value of the test statistic (T) is the smaller count of positive or negative differences: \(T = \min (6, 1)\) \(T = 1\) #Step 5: Determine the critical value and rejection region#
06

Determine the critical value (Tα)

Since it is a two-tailed test with a significance level of α = 0.10, we should look up in the table/appropriate resource for the critical value (Tα) corresponding to our sample size (n = 7) and α value: \(T_{(1-\alpha/2)} = T_{0.95} = 0\) (This value can be found in tables or using calculators or statistical software)
07

Set the rejection region

Our rejection region is: \(T \leq T_{0.95}\) #Step 6: Compare the test statistic and make a conclusion#
08

Comparing test statistic and critical value

We need to compare the observed value of the test statistic (T = 1) with the critical value (Tα = 0): \(T = 1 > T_{0.95} = 0\)
09

Conclusion

Since the observed value of the test statistic (T = 1) is not in the rejection region, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means we do not have enough evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between the medians of the two populations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
When performing a sign test, one of the primary steps is to define the null hypothesis, which provides a starting point for statistical analysis. The null hypothesis (\( H_0 \) ) is a statement of no effect or no difference. It is essentially a skeptical position, which assumes that any observed differences in the data are due to chance rather than a real effect.

For instance, in the given exercise, the null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference between the medians of the two populations being compared, mathematically stated as \( H_0: M_1 - M_2 = 0 \). This hypothesis is what we presuppose to be true before collecting any data, and our test aims to determine whether the observed data provide enough evidence to reject this assumption.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis (\( H_1 \) or \( H_a \)) provides contrast to the null hypothesis. It suggests that there is an effect or a difference, and in the context of the sign test, it posits that the medians of the two populations are not equal. This hypothesis reflects the research question or the suspicion that led to the investigation.

In our example, the alternative hypothesis is defined as \( H_1: M_1 - M_2 eq 0 \), which means we suspect that there is a significant difference between the population medians. The alternative hypothesis is what we seek to support by showing that the null hypothesis is unlikely given the data.
Test Statistic
A test statistic is a calculated value used to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis. It is derived from sample data and measures the degree of agreement between the null hypothesis and the observed data. For the sign test, the test statistic (\( T \) ) is determined by the smaller number of positive or negative differences in paired observations.

In the exercise provided, it was necessary to calculate the differences for each pair and then count the number of positive and negative differences. The test statistic was the minimum of these counts (\( T = \min(6, 1) = 1 \)). This value is then compared to a critical value to help decide if there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
Rejection Region
The rejection region defines the values of the test statistic that would lead to rejection of the null hypothesis. It is determined based on the significance level of the test, denoted by \( \alpha \). A common significance level used in hypothesis testing is 0.05, but in the exercise, the significance level was set as \( \alpha \leq 0.10 \).

By consulting statistical tables or software with a given \( \alpha \) value and the number of pairs (\( n \) ), we find the critical value (\( T_\alpha \) ) that delineates the rejection region. In this case, the rejection region is \( T \leq T_{0.95} \). Since the observed test statistic (\( T = 1 \) ) is greater than the critical value (\( T_{0.95} = 0 \)), it falls outside the rejection region, meaning we do not reject the null hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use the large-sample approximation to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with the information from Exercises \(5-6,\) reproduced below. Calculate the \(p\) -value for the test and draw conclusions with \(\alpha=.05 .\) Compare your results with the results in Exercises 5-6. Test for a difference in the two distributions when \(n=30\) and \(T^{+}=249\)

A political scientist is studying the relationship between the voter image of a conservative political candidate and the distance (in kilometers) between the residences of the voter and the candidate. Each of 12 voters rated the candidate on a scale of \(1-20\). a. Calculate Spearman's rank correlation coefficient \(r_{s}\) b. Do these data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a negative rank correlation between rating and distance?

Use the information given in Exercises \(8-9\) to calculate Spearman's rank correlation coefficient \(r_{s} .\) Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate an association between variables \(A\) and \(B\) ? Use \(\alpha=.05 .\) $$\begin{array}{l|rrrrrr}\text { A } & 1.2 & .8 & 2.1 & 3.5 & 2.7 & 1.5 \\\\\hline \text { B } & 1.0 & 1.3 & .1 & -.8 & -.2 & .6\end{array}$$

A high school principal formed a review board consisting of five teachers who were asked to interview 12 applicants for a vacant teaching position and rank them in order of merit. Seven of the applicants held college degrees but had limited teaching experience. Of the remaining five applicants, all had college degrees and substantial experience. The review board's rankings are given in the table. $$ \begin{array}{cc} \hline \text { Limited Experience } & \text { Substantial Experience } \\ \hline 4 & 1 \\ 6 & 2 \\ 7 & 3 \\ 9 & 5 \\ 10 & 8 \\ 11 & \\ 12 & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Do these rankings indicate that the review board considers experience a prime factor in the selection of the best candidates? Test using \(\alpha=.05 .\)

Two methods for controlling traffic, \(A\) and \(B\), were used at each of \(n=12\) intersections for a period of 1 week, and the numbers of accidents that occurred during this time period were recorded. The order of use (which method would be employed for the first week) was randomly selected. You want to know whether the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the distributions of accident rates for traffic control methods \(A\) and \(B\) $$ \begin{array}{ccc|ccccc} \hline & {\text { Method }} & & & {\text { Method }} \\ \text { Intersection } & \text { A } & \text { B } & \text { Intersection } & \text { A } & \text { B } \\ \hline 1 & 5 & 4 & 7 & 2 & 3 \\ 2 & 6 & 4 & 8 & 4 & 1 \\ 3 & 8 & 9 & 9 & 7 & 9 \\ 4 & 3 & 2 & 10 & 5 & 2 \\ 5 & 6 & 3 & 11 & 6 & 5 \\ 6 & 1 & 0 & 12 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Analyze using a sign test. b. Analyze using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for a paired experiment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free