Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Decide whether the alternative hypothesis for the Wilcoxon signed-rank test is one- or two-tailed. Then give the null and alternative hypotheses for the test. You want to decide whether distribution 1 lies to the right of distribution 2 .

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The alternative hypothesis for the Wilcoxon signed-rank test in this case is one-tailed. The null hypothesis (H0) is that the median difference between the two distributions is equal to zero (Md = 0), and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the median difference between the two distributions is greater than 0 (Md > 0).

Step by step solution

01

Determine if the hypothesis is one- or two-tailed

Based on the purpose of the test (deciding whether distribution 1 lies to the right of distribution 2), we will have a one-tailed test. This is because we are interested in determining a specific direction of the difference (distribution 1 being greater than distribution 2).
02

State the null hypothesis (H0)

The null hypothesis represents the situation where there is no difference between the distributions. In this case, the null hypothesis is that the median difference between the two distributions is equal to zero. Mathematically, H0: Md = 0, where Md is the median difference between distribution 1 and distribution 2.
03

State the alternative hypothesis (Ha)

The alternative hypothesis represents the situation where distribution 1 lies to the right of distribution 2, meaning the median difference between the two distributions is greater than 0. Mathematically, Ha: Md > 0, where Md is the median difference between distribution 1 and distribution 2. In summary, for this problem, we have a one-tailed test, and the null and alternative hypotheses for the Wilcoxon signed-rank test are: - Null hypothesis (H0): Md = 0 - Alternative hypothesis (Ha): Md > 0 *Note: Md represents the median difference between distribution 1 and distribution 2.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

One-Tailed Test
In probability and statistics, a one-tailed test is a statistical hypothesis test in which the alternative hypothesis specifies a direction of the effect. In other words, it predicts that a parameter is either greater than or less than a certain value, but not both. When applying a one-tailed test, researchers are essentially looking for evidence of an effect in one particular direction.

For instance, if a study is conducted to find out if a new drug is more effective than the current standard, the researcher might use a one-tailed test to determine if the new drug provides better outcomes. This means that any improvement would only need to be in one direction—better, not worse—to be considered significant. It's crucial to choose the correct type of test as using a one-tailed test when a two-tailed test is appropriate can result in incorrect conclusions.

Utilizing a one-tailed test increases the likelihood of finding a significant result if the effect is in the predicted direction, simply because all of the statistical power of the test is focused on detecting an effect in that one direction. This is particularly important in fields where directionality is predicted by theory or precedent, and only an effect in that direction would have practical implications.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, often symbolized as H0, is a statement used in statistics that indicates no effect or no difference. When performing any hypothesis test, the null hypothesis serves as the starting point. It is the assumption that any kind of difference or significance you see in a set of data is due to chance. The goal of many statistical tests is to determine whether there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

For example, if you are testing a new teaching method to see if it improves students' test scores, the null hypothesis would state that there is no difference in test scores between groups who study with the standard method and groups who study with the new method. Here, the disparity observed could be due to variability in the students' understanding, the difficulty of the material, or even randomness in test score distribution.

Testing the null hypothesis generally involves calculating a p-value, which is the probability of observing the data, or something more extreme, if the null hypothesis is true. If this probability is very low (usually below a pre-set threshold like 5%), researchers may decide to reject the null hypothesis, concluding that the observed effect is statistically significant.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, denoted as Ha or H1, is a statement that directly contradicts the null hypothesis. It usually claims that there is a difference, effect, or relationship in the population from which the sample data has been drawn. While the null hypothesis is a statement of no effect, the alternative hypothesis is what the researcher wants to prove.

Using the previous teaching method example, the alternative hypothesis would propose that there is a difference in test scores between groups who study with the standard method and groups who study with the new method. If the p-value is low enough to reject the null hypothesis, the alternative hypothesis stands, suggesting there is statistically significant evidence to support it.

It's important to note that failing to reject the null hypothesis does not necessarily prove it true. It merely indicates that there isn't sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. The determination of the null and alternative hypotheses is a critical step in the design of an experiment or study as it guides the methods used and the interpretation of results.
Probability and Statistics
Probability and statistics are branches of mathematics that deal with data collection, analysis, interpretation, and presentation. Probability provides a measure of how likely it is that something will happen, which is a fundamental aspect of statistics.

In statistics, data are collected and analyzed to draw conclusions about populations or processes. These conclusions often involve generalizing from samples to populations, testing hypotheses, and making predictions. Key concepts in statistics include variability, randomness, significance, and the balancing of type I and type II errors.

Understanding probability and statistics is paramount when applying tests like the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. This knowledge base helps researchers determine the appropriate test to use, interpret p-values, and understand the implications of their findings. It also leads to more informed decisions about collecting and analyzing data, ensuring that the findings are reliable and valid. Essentially, statistics allows us to make educated guesses about the unknown based on the information given by the data we can observe and measure.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The data given result from experiments run in completely randomized designs. Use the Kruskal-Wallis H statistic to determine whether there are significant differences between at least two of the treatment groups at the \(5 \%\) level of significance. You can use a computer program if one is available. Summarize your results. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \text { Treatment } & \\ \hline 1 & 2 & 3 \\ \hline 26 & 27 & 25 \\ 29 & 31 & 24 \\ 23 & 30 & 27 \\ 24 & 28 & 22 \\ 28 & 29 & 24 \\ 26 & 32 & 20 \\ & 30 & 21 \\ & 33 & \\ \hline \end{array} $$

The information in Exercises 5-6 refers to a paired-difference experiment. Analyze the data using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. State the null and alternative hypotheses to be tested and calculate the test statistic. Find the rejection region for \(\alpha=.05\) and state your conclusions. \(\left[\right.\) NOTE \(\left.: T^{+}+T^{-}=n(n+1) / 2 .\right]\) Test for a difference in the two distributions when \(n=30\) and \(T^{+}=249\)

How does Alex Smith, quarterback for the Kansas City Chiefs, compare to Joe Flacco, quarterback for the Baltimore Ravens? The following table shows the number of completed passes for each athlete during the 2017 NFL football season: $$ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc} \hline \multicolumn{3}{c|} {\text { Alex Smith }} & \multicolumn{3}{|c} {\text { Joe Flacco }} \\ \hline 25 & 27 & 29 & 25 & 22 & 19 \\ 23 & 25 & 27 & 29 & 34 & 31 \\ 20 & 14 & 16 & 26 & 10 & 8 \\ 19 & 25 & 21 & 20 & 27 & 25 \\ 23 & 19 & 28 & 23 & 24 & 9 \\ & & & 20 & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Use the Wilcoxon rank sum test to analyze the data and test to see whether the population distributions for the number of completed passes differ for the two quarterbacks. Use \(\alpha=.05 .\)

The data were collected using a randomized block design. For each data set, use the Friedman \(F\) -test to test for differences in location among the treatment distributions using \(\alpha=.05 .\) Bound the \(p\) -value for the test using Table 5 of Appendix \(I\) and state your conclusions. $$ \begin{array}{crrrr} \hline \quad &&& {\text { Treatment }} \\ \text { Block } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline 1 & 89 & 81 & 84 & 85 \\ 2 & 93 & 86 & 86 & 88 \\ 3 & 91 & 85 & 87 & 86 \\ 4 & 85 & 79 & 80 & 82 \\ 5 & 90 & 84 & 85 & 85 \\ 6 & 86 & 78 & 83 & 84 \\ 7 & 87 & 80 & 83 & 82 \\ 8 & 93 & 86 & 88 & 90 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Advertising Campaigns The results of an investigation of product recognition following three advertising campaigns were reported in Example \(11.15 .\) The responses were the percentage adults in 15 different groups who were familiar with the newly advertised product. The normal probability plot indicated that the data were not approximately normal and another method of analysis should be used. Is there a significant difference among the three population distributions from which these samples came? Use an appropriate nonparametric method to answer this question. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \text { Campaign } & \\ \hline 1 & 2 & 3 \\ \hline 33 & .28 & 21 \\ .29 & .41 & 30 \\ 21 & .34 & 26 \\ 32 & .39 & .33 \\ .25 & .27 & .31 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free