Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Statistics of the world's religions are only approximate, because many religions do not keep track of their membership numbers. An estimate of these numbers (in millions) is shown in the table. \({ }^{11}\) $$ \begin{array}{lrlr} \hline \text { Religion } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Members } \\ \text { (millions) Religion } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Members } \\ \text { (millions) } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Buddhism } & 376 & \text { Judaism } & 14 \\ \text { Christianity } & 2,100 & \text { Sikhism } & 23 \\ \text { Hinduism } & 900 & \text { Chinese traditional } & 394 \\ \text { Islam } & 1,500 & \text { Other } & 61 \\ \text { Primal indigenous } & 400 & & \\ \text { and African } & & & \\ \text { traditional } & & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Use a pie chart to describe the total membership in the world's organized religions. b. Use a bar chart to describe the total membership in the world's organized religions. c. Order the religious groups from the smallest to the largest number of members. Use a Pareto chart to describe the data. Which of the three displays is the most effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The Pareto chart is generally considered the most effective means of displaying the data on the total membership in the world's religions for this specific exercise because it combines the clear numerical differences of a bar chart with an additional line chart showing the cumulative percentage of membership, allowing for a more comprehensive visualization and interpretation of the data distribution and focus on the largest religious groups.

Step by step solution

01

a. Pie Chart

First, let's create a pie chart to represent the world's organized religions membership. To create a pie chart, we need to find the percentage share of each religious group. Calculate the total population by adding up the members of all religious groups: Total population = \(376 + 2100 + 900 + 1500 + 400 + 14 + 23 + 394 + 61 = 5768\) (in millions) Now find the percentage share of each group by dividing the number of members in each group by the total population and multiplying by 100: Buddhism: \(100 \times \frac{376}{5768} \approx 6.52\% \) Christianity: \(100 \times \frac{2100}{5768} \approx 36.40\%\) Hinduism: \(100 \times \frac{900}{5768} \approx 15.59\%\) Islam: \(100 \times \frac{1500}{5768} \approx 26.00\%\) Primal Indigenous and African Traditional: \(100 \times \frac{400}{5768} \approx 6.93\%\) Judaism: \(100 \times \frac{14}{5768} \approx 0.24\%\) Sikhism: \(100 \times \frac{23}{5768} \approx 0.40\%\) Chinese Traditional: \(100 \times \frac{394}{5768} \approx 6.83\%\) Other: \(100 \times \frac{61}{5768} \approx 1.06\%\) Using these percentage shares, create a pie chart with each religion represented by a slice proportional to its share in the total population.
02

b. Bar Chart

Creating a bar chart is more straightforward. Assign each religion its own category, and create a vertical bar that corresponds to the number of members (in millions). Plot the religions along the x-axis, and represent the membership figures along the y-axis by drawing bars of appropriate heights.
03

c. Pareto Chart and Comparison

First, sort the religions from smallest to largest membership number: 1. Judaism: 14 million 2. Sikhism: 23 million 3. Other: 61 million 4. Chinese Traditional: 394 million 5. Primal Indigenous and African Traditional: 400 million 6. Buddhism: 376 million 7. Hinduism: 900 million 8. Islam: 1,500 million 9. Christianity: 2,100 million A Pareto chart combines a bar chart and a line chart. Plot the ordered religions (from smallest to largest) along the x-axis and draw bars corresponding to the membership figures on the y-axis. Additionally, create a line chart to show the cumulative percentage (y-axis) of the number of members for each religion, starting from the smallest group to the largest. To determine which of the three displays is most effective, consider the information each chart conveys. The pie chart provides an easy visual comparison of the proportional sizes of each religious group, while the bar chart clearly displays the numerical differences. Lastly, the Pareto chart highlights the distribution in a clearer manner and can be used to focus on the largest religious groups. Considering information delivery and ease of interpretation, the Pareto chart is generally the most effective means of displaying this data for this specific exercise.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Pie Charts
A pie chart is a circular statistical graphic, which is divided into slices to illustrate numerical proportion. In this case, we are visualizing the membership numbers of the world's organized religions. Each slice of the pie chart corresponds to a religion and represents its percentage share of the total population. This visual representation is particularly effective for showing the relative sizes of data categories.

To create a pie chart, the total value of all categories combined must first be calculated — the sum of all religious group memberships in this exercise. Then, the size of each slice is determined by calculating what fraction of the total each category represents, which is then multiplied by 100 to get a percentage. This exercise emphasizes that pie charts are intuitive for showing the part-to-whole relationship; however, when it comes to comparing individual groups, especially those with similar proportions, it can be slightly less effective than other chart types due to the difficulty in assessing the size of each slice.
Bar Charts and their Functionality
On the other hand, a bar chart is an excellent tool for comparing the differences between categories due to its simple and clear layout. It uses rectangular bars to represent different data points, with the length of each bar corresponding to its category's value.

In educational probability and statistics, bar charts are particularly helpful because they arrange data into an easy-to-read format, where each religion is assigned to an individual bar with the height representing the membership (in millions here). It allows students to quickly grasp high and low quantities and make direct comparisons between categories. Our exercise proves that bar charts can display absolute numbers effectively, giving a clear snapshot of the data at a single glance. This makes it a favored tool in many educational and business settings where precise data representation is crucial.
Pareto Charts for Prioritized Analysis
Lastly, introducing the Pareto chart, which is a specialized type of bar chart. A Pareto chart is particularly useful in displaying both frequency of occurrence and its cumulative impact. It is essentially a bar chart ordered in descending order of magnitude from left to right, with an overlaid line graph representing the cumulative total percentage.

As shown in the step-by-step solution for this exercise, religious groups are organized from the smallest number of members to the largest. The bar component of the Pareto chart shows the number of members in millions, and the line component demonstrates a cumulative percentage of the total population up to that point. This dual-purpose graph is valuable in educational contexts for its ability to identify the 'vital few' — a principle suggesting that most effects come from relatively few causes. In our religious membership analysis, a Pareto chart provides a hierarchical structure to the data, highlighting the most significant religions in terms of membership count, which offers deep insights into the distribution, potentially guiding where educational or social resources could be prioritized.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Experimental Units Define the experimental units for the variables described in Exercises \(1-5 .\) Gender of a student

The test scores on a l00-point test were recorded for 20 students. Construct a relative frequency distribution for the data, using 6 classes of width \(8,\) and starting at \(52 .\) Then answer the questions. $$ \begin{array}{llllllllll} 61 & 93 & 91 & 86 & 55 & 63 & 86 & 82 & 76 & 57 \\ 94 & 89 & 67 & 62 & 72 & 87 & 68 & 65 & 75 & 84 \end{array} $$ Compare the shape of the histogram to the stem and leaf plot from Exercise \(16,\) Section \(1.3 .\) Are the shapes roughly the same?

Aqua running has been suggested as a method of exercise for injured athletes and others who want a low-impact aerobics program. A study reported in the Journal of Sports Medicine reported the heart rates of 20 healthy volunteers at a cadence of 96 steps per minute. \({ }^{8}\) The data are listed here: \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrr}87 & 109 & 79 & 80 & 96 & 95 & 90 & 92 & 96 & 98 \\\ 101 & 91 & 78 & 112 & 94 & 98 & 94 & 107 & 81 & 96\end{array}\) a. Construct a stem and leaf plot to describe the data. b. Discuss the characteristics of the data distribution.

How Long Is the Line? To decide on the number of service counters needed for stores to be built in the future, a supermarket chain gathered information on the length of time (in minutes) required to service customers, using a sample of 60 customers' service times, shown here: $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrr} 3.6 & 1.9 & 2.1 & .3 & .8 & .2 & 1.0 & 1.4 & 1.8 & 1.6 \\ 1.1 & 1.8 & .3 & 1.1 & .5 & 1.2 & .6 & 1.1 & .8 & 1.7 \\ 1.4 & .2 & 1.3 & 3.1 & .4 & 2.3 & 1.8 & 4.5 & .9 & .7 \\ .6 & 2.8 & 2.5 & 1.1 & .4 & 1.2 & .4 & 1.3 & .8 & 1.3 \\ 1.1 & 1.2 & .8 & 1.0 & .9 & .7 & 3.1 & 1.7 & 1.1 & 2.2 \\ 1.6 & 1.9 & 5.2 & .5 & 1.8 & .3 & 1.1 & .6 & .7 & .6 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a relative frequency histogram for the supermarket service times. b. Describe the shape of the distribution. Do you see any outliers? c. Assuming that the outliers in this data set are valid observations, how would you explain them to the management of the supermarket chain?

Construct a relative frequency histogram for these 20 measurements on a discrete variable that can take only the values \(0, I,\) and 2. Then answer the questions. $$ \begin{array}{lllll} 1 & 2 & 1 & 0 & 2 \\ 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 2 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 2 & 1 & 1 \end{array} $$ If a measurement is selected at random from the 20 measurements shown, what is the probability that it is a \(2 ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free