Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A production plant has two complex fabricating systems, both of which are maintained at 2 -week intervals. However, one system is twice as old as the other. The number of finished products fabricated daily by each of the systems is recorded for 30 working days, with the results given in the table. Do these data present sufficient evidence to conclude that the variability in daily production warrants increased maintenance of the older fabricating system? Use the \(p\) -value approach. $$ \begin{array}{ll} \text { New System } & \text { Old System } \\ \hline \bar{x}_{1}=246 & \bar{x}_{2}=240 \\ s_{1}=15.6 & s_{2}=28.2 \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Yes, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variability in daily production is significantly greater for the older system, which warrants increased maintenance for the older fabricating system.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the sample variances

Calculate the sample variances for both the new system (\(s_1^2\)) and old system (\(s_2^2\)) using their respective given standard deviations (\(s_1\) and \(s_2\)): $$ s_1^2 = (15.6)^2 = 243.36 $$ $$ s_2^2 = (28.2)^2 = 795.24 $$
02

Calculate the F-statistic

Calculate the F-statistic using the sample variances calculated in Step 1 (\(s_1^2\) and \(s_2^2\)). The F-statistic is determined by dividing the largest variance by the smallest variance: $$ F = \frac{s_2^2}{s_1^2} = \frac{795.24}{243.36} = 3.267 $$
03

Determine the degrees of freedom

Find the degrees of freedom for the numerator (df1) and the denominator (df2). Since both systems were observed for 30 working days, we subtract 1 from 30 to find the degrees of freedom for each system: $$ \text{df1} = 30 - 1 = 29 $$ $$ \text{df2} = 30 - 1 = 29 $$
04

Determine the critical value and p-value

Using an F-distribution table or calculator, find the critical value and p-value corresponding to the F-statistic (3.267) and the degrees of freedom (29, 29). Here, we will assume a significance level of 0.05: $$ \text{Critical value (at 0.05 significance level)} \approx 1.835 $$ $$ \text{p-value} \approx 0.013 $$
05

Compare the p-value with the significance level and draw a conclusion

With the p-value of 0.013 being less than the significance level of 0.05, we have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the two systems have equal variances. This means that the variability in daily production is significantly greater for the older system, which warrants increased maintenance for the older fabricating system.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

F-statistic
The F-statistic is a crucial part of comparing two sample variances to determine if they are significantly different. It is calculated by taking the ratio of the two variances, specifically dividing the larger variance by the smaller one. This value tells us how much the variance of one sample differs from another. In this exercise, the F-statistic was calculated by using the variances from the older and new fabricating systems.
  • Calculation: The formula for the F-statistic is \[F = \frac{s_2^2}{s_1^2}\] where \(s_2^2\) is the variance of the old system (795.24) and \(s_1^2\) is the variance of the new system (243.36).
  • Interpretation: A high F-statistic indicates a larger difference in variances, suggesting that the variability in data is not due to random chance. In contrast, an F-statistic near 1 suggests similar variances.
Understanding the F-statistic helps in determining whether maintenance decisions are warranted based on the variability observed in production systems.
Degrees of freedom
Degrees of freedom (df) refer to the number of values in a statistical calculation that are free to vary. When calculating the F-statistic, each sample variance requires us to account for the degrees of freedom.
  • Calculation:For the production data, we subtract 1 from the sample size of each system (30), which gives 29 degrees of freedom for each.\[\text{df1} = n_1 - 1 = 29, \quad \text{df2} = n_2 - 1 = 29\]
  • Role in Hypothesis Testing:The degrees of freedom are used to determine the critical value from F-distribution tables. Having the correct degrees of freedom ensures the results are statistically valid and the comparison between variances is sound.
Degrees of freedom are key to understanding how much information is incorporated into our statistical tests, ultimately affecting the p-value and decision-making process.
Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) represents a statement of no effect or no difference, which we seek to test against an alternative hypothesis.
  • Statement:In this exercise, the null hypothesis is that the variances of the two fabrication systems are equal, indicating that the differences in production variability are not significant.
  • Decision Based on p-value:We'll compare our calculated p-value to a pre-defined significance level (commonly 0.05). If the p-value is lower than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that there is significant evidence to indicate a difference in variances.
Rejecting the null hypothesis leads to the conclusion that increased maintenance is justified for the older system due to its higher variability.
Sample Variance
Sample variance is a measure of the dispersion or spread of a set of data points. It tells us how much the data varies from its mean and is crucial in the context of hypothesis testing. In this problem, we calculate variances for each system to understand the variability in production.
  • Calculation:Sample variance \(s^2\) for each system is calculated by squaring the standard deviation \(s\). In this exercise, for the new system: \[s_1^2 = (15.6)^2 = 243.36\] For the old system:\[s_2^2 = (28.2)^2 = 795.24\]
  • Importance:The variance is crucial as the F-statistic relies on these values. Larger variance means more spread in data, impacting reliability and maintenance decisions for the systems.
By examining sample variance, we gain insights into the consistency and reliability of production across different systems.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As part of a larger pilot study, students at a Riverside, California middle school, will compare the learning of algebra by students using iPads versus students using the traditional algebra textbook with the same author and publisher. \(^{20}\) To remove teacher-to-teacher variation, the same teacher will teach both classes, and the iPad and textbook material are both provided by the same author and publisher. Suppose that after 1 month, 10 students were selected from each class and their scores on an algebra advancement test recorded. The summarized data follow. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} & \text { iPad } & \text { Textbook } \\ \hline \text { Mean } & 86.4 & 79.7 \\ \text { Standard Deviation } & 8.95 & 10.7 \\ \text { Sample Size } & 10 & 10 \end{array} $$ a. Use the summary data to test for a significant difference in advancement scores for the two groups using \(\alpha=.05 .\) b. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean scores for the two groups. c. In light of parts a and b, what can we say about the efficacy of using an iPad versus a traditional textbook in learning algebra at the middle school level?

To properly treat patients, drugs prescribed by physicians must not only have a mean potency value as specified on the drug's container, but also the variation in potency values must be small. Otherwise, pharmacists would be distributing drug prescriptions that could be harmfully potent or have a low potency and be ineffective. A drug manufacturer claims that his drug has a potency of \(5 \pm .1\) milligram per cubic centimeter \((\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc})\). A random sample of four containers gave potency readings equal to 4.94,5.09 , 5.03, and \(4.90 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc} .\) a. Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that the mean potency differs from \(5 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc} ?\) b. Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that the variation in potency differs from the error limits specified by the manufacturer? (HINT: It is sometimes difficult to determine exactly what is meant by limits on potency as specified by a manufacturer. Since he implies that the potency values will fall into the interval \(5 \pm .1 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc}\) with very high probability - the implication is almost always-let us assume that the range \(.2 ;\) or 4.9 to \(5.1,\) represents \(6 \sigma\) as suggested by the Empirical Rule).

Use Table 4 in Appendix I to bound the following \(p\) -values: a. \(P(t>1.2)\) with \(5 d f\). b. \(P(t>2)+P(t<-2)\) with \(10 d f\) c. \(P(t<-3.3)\) with \(8 d f\) d. \(P(t>0.6)\) with \(12 d f\)

At a time when energy conservation is so important, some scientists think closer scrutiny should be given to the cost (in energy) of producing various forms of food. Suppose you wish to compare the mean amount of oil required to produce 1 acre of corn versus 1 acre of cauliflower. The readings (in barrels of oil per acre), based on 20 -acre plots, seven for each crop, are shown in the table. $$ \begin{array}{lc} \text { Corn } & \text { Cauliflower } \\ \hline 5.6 & 15.9 \\ 7.1 & 13.4 \\ 4.5 & 17.6 \\ 6.0 & 16.8 \\ 7.9 & 15.8 \\ 4.8 & 16.3 \\ 5.7 & 17.1 \end{array} $$ a. Use these data to find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the mean amounts of oil required to produce these two crops. b. Based on the interval in part a, is there evidence of a difference in the average amount of oil required to produce these two crops? Explain.

Here are the prices per ounce of \(n=13\) different brands of individually wrapped cheese slices: $$ \begin{array}{lllll} 29.0 & 24.1 & 23.7 & 19.6 & 27.5 \\ 28.7 & 28.0 & 23.8 & 18.9 & 23.9 \\ 21.6 & 25.9 & 27.4 & & \end{array} $$ Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval estimate of the underlying average price per ounce of individually wrapped cheese slices.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free