Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Use Table 4 in Appendix I to find the following critical values: a. An upper one-tailed rejection region with \(\alpha=.05\) and \(11 d f\). b. A two-tailed rejection region with \(\alpha=.05\) and \(7 d f\). c. A lower one-tailed rejection region with \(\alpha=.01\) and \(15 d f\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Find the critical values for the following cases using a t-distribution table. Mention whether it's an upper one-tailed, two-tailed, or lower one-tailed test. a. Significance level = 0.05, degrees of freedom = 11 b. Significance level = 0.05, degrees of freedom = 7 c. Significance level = 0.01, degrees of freedom = 15 Answer: a. Upper one-tailed: 1.796 b. Two-tailed: -2.365 and 2.365 c. Lower one-tailed: -2.602

Step by step solution

01

Find the significance level and degrees of freedom for each case

Since we need to find critical values for three different cases, we can list down the significance level (\(\alpha\)) and degrees of freedom (\(d f\)) for each case: a. \(\alpha = 0.05\), \(d f = 11\) (Upper one-tailed) b. \(\alpha = 0.05\), \(d f = 7\) (Two-tailed) c. \(\alpha = 0.01\), \(d f = 15\) (Lower one-tailed)
02

Use Table 4 in Appendix I to find the critical values for each case

To find the critical values, we need to use the information from the table provided in Appendix I, which contains t-distribution critical values for given significance levels and degrees of freedom. a. Upper one-tailed rejection region with \(\alpha =0.05\), \(d f = 11\): Find the row for \(11 d f\) in Table 4 and look at the column for the given significance level (\(\alpha=0.05\)). The critical value for this case is \(1.796\). b. Two-tailed rejection region with \(\alpha=0.05\), \(d f = 7\): Firstly, find the row for \(7 d f\) in Table 4 and look at the column for the given significance level (\(\alpha=0.05\)). Since it's a two-tailed test, we need to find the critical value for \(\alpha/2 = 0.025\). The critical value in this case is \(±2.365\). Keep in mind that since this is two-tailed, the negative value is the lower bound, and the positive value is the upper bound. c. Lower one-tailed rejection region with \(\alpha=0.01\), \(d f = 15\): Find the row for \(15 d f\) in Table 4 and look at the column for the given significance level (\(\alpha=0.01\)). The critical value for this case is \(-2.602\). Since it's a lower one-tailed test, we should use the negative value as the critical value. So, the critical values for each case are: a. Upper one-tailed: \(1.796\) b. Two-tailed: \(-2.365\) and \(2.365\) c. Lower one-tailed: \(-2.602\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Critical Value
The critical value is a key concept in hypothesis testing that helps determine the cutoff point for deciding if a test statistic is significant. When conducting a t-test, the critical value indicates the threshold beyond which we reject the null hypothesis. It is closely associated with the significance level, denoted as \(\alpha\), which reflects the probability of making a Type I error (rejecting a true null hypothesis).
  • For an upper one-tailed test with \(\alpha = 0.05\) and \(d f = 11\), the critical value is found at the 0.05 significance level, giving us \(1.796\).
  • In a two-tailed test with \(\alpha = 0.05\) and \(d f = 7\), the critical value is split between the tails; hence we use \(\alpha/2 = 0.025\), resulting in critical values of \(\pm 2.365\).
  • For a lower one-tailed test with \(\alpha = 0.01\) and \(d f = 15\), the critical value is found at \(-2.602\), being a negative value because we are considering the lower end of the t-distribution.
Understanding how to determine the critical value is crucial as it directly influences the decision about the null hypothesis.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom ( **df**) play a significant role in calculations involving statistical tests, such as the t-distribution. They determine the shape of the distribution and depend primarily on the sample size. In general, degrees of freedom are calculated as the sample size minus one ( **df = n - 1** ). They essentially represent the number of values that are free to vary in a statistical calculation.
  • In the original exercise, we dealt with samples where degrees of freedom were 11, 7, and 15.
  • Each of these determines the critical regions which are based on how much data we have available for estimating population parameters.
  • The more degrees of freedom, the closer the distribution of the test statistic resembles the standard normal distribution.
Getting comfortable with understanding and manipulating degrees of freedom will enhance your capability to conduct accurate statistical tests and make more informed decisions.
One-tailed Test
A one-tailed test is a statistical hypothesis test in which the alternative hypothesis specifies a direction. This means that the rejection region is located on only one side of the probability distribution curve. One-tailed tests can either be upper or lower-tailed based on where the extreme value you are testing for falls.
  • In an **upper one-tailed test**, the critical value determines when to reject the null hypothesis if the test statistic is too high (e.g., \(\alpha =0.05\), df = 11 leads to a critical value of \(1.796\)).
  • In contrast, a **lower one-tailed test** determines if the test statistic falls below a certain negative critical value (e.g., \(\alpha =0.01\), df = 15 with a critical value of \(-2.602\)).
  • These tests are most effective when the research hypothesis predicts a change or effect in a specific direction.
One-tailed tests offer greater statistical power to detect an effect in one direction at the cost of not being able to detect effects in the opposite direction.
Two-tailed Test
A two-tailed test is used when you want to assess whether there is an effect in either direction, without specifying whether it is higher or lower. This makes two-tailed tests very versatile for scenarios where a non-directional change or difference is expected or possible.
  • In a **two-tailed test**, such as the one with \(\alpha = 0.05\) and df = 7, both tails of the distribution are considered, resulting in rejection regions in both extremes (\(\pm 2.365\)).
  • The significance level \(\alpha\) is divided equally between the two tails, making them more conservative since you need stronger evidence to reject the null as compared to one-tailed tests.
  • This test is ideal when no prior expectation exists concerning the direction of the effect being tested, which aligns with the formulation of the alternative hypothesis as "not equal to."
A two-tailed test covers all bases in terms of potential outcomes, ensuring that conclusions drawn are robust to variations on either side of the spectrum.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to Exercise \(10.100 .\) Wishing to demonstrate that the variability of fills is less for her model than for her competitor's, a sales representative for company A acquired a sample of 30 fills from her company's model and a sample of 10 fills from her competitor's model. The sample variances were \(s_{A}^{2}=.027\) and \(s_{B}^{2}=.065,\) respectively. Does this result provide statistical support at the .05 level of significance for the sales representative's claim?

Measurements of water intake, obtained from a sample of 17 rats that had been injected with a sodium chloride solution, produced a mean and standard deviation of 31.0 and 6.2 cubic centimeters \(\left(\mathrm{cm}^{3}\right),\) respectively. Given that the average water intake for noninjected rats observed over a comparable period of time is \(22.0 \mathrm{~cm}^{3},\) do the data indicate that injected rats drink more water than noninjected rats? Test at the \(5 \%\) level of significance. Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the mean water intake for injected rats.

A comparison of the precisions of two machines developed for extracting juice from oranges is to be made using the following data: $$ \begin{array}{ll} \text { Machine A } & \text { Machine B } \\ \hline s^{2}=3.1 \text { ounces }^{2} & s^{2}=1.4 \text { ounces }^{2} \\ n=25 & n=25 \end{array} $$ a. Is there sufficient evidence to indicate that there is a difference in the precision of the two machines at the \(5 \%\) level of significance? b. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the ratio of the two population variances. Does this interval confirm your conclusion from part a? Explain.

A pharmaceutical manufacturer purchases a particular material from two different suppliers. The mean level of impurities in the raw material is approximately the same for both suppliers, but the manufacturer is concerned about the variability of the impurities from shipment to shipment. To compare the variation in percentage impurities for the two suppliers, the manufacturer selects 10 shipments from each of the two suppliers and measures the percentage of impurities in the raw material for each shipment. The sample means and variances are shown in the table. $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{ll} \text { Supplier } \mathrm{A} & \text { Supplier } \mathrm{B} \\ \hline \bar{x}_{1}=1.89 & \bar{x}_{2}=1.85 \\ s_{1}^{2}=.273 & s_{2}^{2}=.094 \end{array}\\\ &n_{1}=10 \quad n_{2}=10 \end{aligned} $$ a. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the variability of the shipment impurity levels for the two suppliers? Test using \(\alpha=.01 .\) Based on the results of your test, what recommendation would you make to the pharmaceutical manufacturer? b. Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(\sigma_{2}^{2}\) and interpret your results.

A manufacturer of industrial light bulbs likes its bulbs to have a mean length of life that is acceptable to its customers and a variation in length of life that is relatively small. A sample of 20 bulbs tested produced the following lengths of life (in hours): $$ \begin{array}{llllllllll} 2100 & 2302 & 1951 & 2067 & 2415 & 1883 & 2101 & 2146 & 2278 & 2019 \\ 1924 & 2183 & 2077 & 2392 & 2286 & 2501 & 1946 & 2161 & 2253 & 1827 \end{array} $$ The manufacturer wishes to control the variability in length of life so that \(\sigma\) is less than 150 hours. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the manufacturer is achieving this goal? Test using \(\alpha=.01\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free