Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why use paired observations to estimate the difference between two population means rather than estimation based on independent random samples selected from the two populations? Is a paired experiment always preferable? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain your reasoning. Answer: Paired observations are used when there is a natural coupling between the data points in the two samples, providing more information about the difference between the two population means and leading to greater confidence and more precise estimates. However, a paired experiment is not always preferable. It is only appropriate when we expect a correlation between the two populations or when the data is collected from a controlled experiment with the same individuals or subjects tested under different conditions. If populations are independent and unrelated, a paired observation method may lead to misleading conclusions. The choice between a paired experiment and independent random samples depends on the nature of the study, the relationship between the samples, and the degree to which the underlying populations are correlated.

Step by step solution

01

Paired Observations Vs. Independent Random Samples

Paired observations are used when there is a natural coupling between the data points in the two samples. This means that each observation in one sample is related or matched with an observation in the other sample. Because of this connection, paired observations can potentially provide more information about the difference between the two population means, leading to greater confidence and more precise estimates. On the other hand, independent random samples are selected from two distinct populations, and there is no inherent relationship between the observations in each sample. Estimating the difference between the population means using independent samples relies on the assumption that each sample adequately represents the respective population without considering the relationship that may exist between the two samples.
02

When to Use Paired Observation Method

The paired observation method is appropriate if we expect any correlation between the two populations, or when the data is collected from a controlled experiment where the same individuals or subjects are tested under different conditions, before and after treatment. For instance, measuring the effectiveness of a new drug on patients by taking measurements before and after treatment.
03

When to Use Independent Random Samples Method

Independent random samples are suitable when there is no expected correlation between the two populations tested, and when the data is collected from separate, unrelated groups. For example, comparing the average height of male high school students in two different countries.
04

Is a Paired Experiment Always Preferable?

While paired experiments offer some advantages, they are not always preferable. It would be inaccurate to apply the paired observation method when the populations are independent and unrelated — it could lead to misleading conclusions. The choice between a paired experiment and independent random samples should depend on the nature of the study, the relationship between the samples, and the degree to which the underlying populations are correlated.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Population Means
Understanding population means is crucial when estimating and comparing data across different groups. A population mean is essentially the average value of a particular variable within a whole population. For instance, if you want to know the average height of students in a school, the population mean would be the total height of all students divided by the number of students. Calculating the population mean helps in understanding the central tendency or the general characteristic of a population. When comparing two population means, it’s common to examine if there is a significant difference between them. This is where statistical tests like the t-test come into play, helping determine if the observed differences are due to chance or reflect a real difference in the populations. Understanding this concept is fundamental when conducting research or experiments that aim to compare different groups or conditions.
Independent Random Samples
Independent random samples are selections made from two distinct populations where samples are completely unrelated. Each sample is chosen randomly, ensuring that the selection in one does not influence the other. This method is great for comparing unrelated groups, making sure that each sample is a good representation of its population. It works by preventing biases that might occur if samples have some inherent connection. By drawing samples independently, researchers can make valid comparisons between the two population means. For example, to compare the average income of people in two different cities, independent random samples from each city would be appropriately used as there is no connection between the populations being compared.
Correlation
Correlation is a statistical measure that describes the degree to which two variables are related. It can be positive, negative, or zero, indicating whether an increase in one variable leads to a corresponding increase, decrease, or no change in another variable. In paired observations, correlation is crucial as it defines the expected relationship between the paired data points. In statistical terms, if two data sets have high correlation, changes in one set imply changes in the other, which can provide more accurate results when estimating the differences between means. In situations where a correlation is expected, like when measuring the impact of a drug before and after treatment, using paired observations can lead to more precise and reliable results.
Controlled Experiment
Controlled experiments are carefully structured studies where researchers make deliberate interventions to understand cause-and-effect relationships. These experiments involve manipulation of one or more variables under controlled conditions to observe the effects on a particular outcome. Examples include tests done in laboratories where variables are tightly controlled to isolate the effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable. In the context of paired observations, controlled experiments often facilitate these comparisons by ensuring that subjects or conditions are consistent across different treatments. For example, a controlled experiment might involve giving one group a medication and another a placebo to compare effects, while controlling other influencing factors. This setup is vital for valid, reliable comparisons between population means.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The calcium (Ca) content of a powdered mineral substance was analyzed 10 times with the following percent compositions recorded: $$ \begin{array}{lllll} .0271 & .0282 & .0279 & .0281 & .0268 \\ .0271 & .0281 & .0269 & .0275 & .0276 \end{array} $$ a. Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the true calcium content of this substance. b. What does the phrase "99\% confident" mean? c. What assumptions must you make about the sampling procedure so that this confidence interval will be valid? What does this mean to the chemist who is performing the analysis?

In a study to determine which factors predict who will benefit from treatment for bulimia nervosa, an article in the British Journal of Clinical Psychology indicates that self-esteem was one of these important predictors. \({ }^{4}\) The table gives the mean and standard deviation of self-esteem scores prior to treatment, at posttreatment, and during a follow-up: $$ \begin{array}{lccc} & \text { Pretreatment } & \text { Posttreatment } & \text { Follow-up } \\ \hline \text { Sample Mean } \bar{x} & 20.3 & 26.6 & 27.7 \\ \text { Standard Deviation } s & 5.0 & 7.4 & 8.2 \\ \text { Sample Size } n & 21 & 21 & 20 \end{array} $$ a. Use a test of hypothesis to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true pretreatment mean is less than \(25 .\) b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the true posttreatment mean. c. In Section \(10.4,\) we will introduce small-sample techniques for making inferences about the difference between two population means. Without the formality of a statistical test, what are you willing to conclude about the differences among the three sampled population means represented by the results in the table?

To compare the demand for two different entrees, the manager of a cafeteria recorded the number of purchases of each entree on seven consecutive days. The data are shown in the table. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a greater mean demand for one of the entrees? Use the Excel printout. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { Day } & \mathrm{A} & \mathrm{B} \\ \hline \text { Monday } & 420 & 391 \\ \text { Tuesday } & 374 & 343 \\ \text { Wednesday } & 434 & 469 \\ \text { Thursday } & 395 & 412 \\ \text { Friday } & 637 & 538 \\ \text { Saturday } & 594 & 521 \\ \text { Sunday } & 679 & 625 \end{array} $$

An experiment was conducted to compare the mean reaction times to twotypes of traffic signs: prohibitive (No Left Turn) and permissive (Left Turn Only). Ten drivers were included in the experiment. Each driver was presented with 40 traffic signs, 20 prohibitive and 20 permissive, in random order. The mean time to reaction (in milliseconds) was recorded for each driver and is shown here a. Explain why this is a paired-difference experiment and give reasons why the pairing should be useful in increasing information on the difference between the mean reaction times to prohibitive and permissive traffic signs. b. Use the Excel printout to determine whether there is a significant difference in mean reaction times to prohibitive and permissive traffic signs. Use the \(p\) -value approach.

Find the following \(t\) -values in Table 4 of Appendix I: a. \(t_{.05}\) for \(5 d f\) b. \(t_{.025}\) for \(8 d f\) c. \(t_{.10}\) for \(18 d f\) d. \(t_{.025}\) for \(30 d f\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free