Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A pharmaceutical manufacturer purchases a particular material from two different suppliers. The mean level of impurities in the raw material is approximately the same for both suppliers, but the manufacturer is concerned about the variability of the impurities from shipment to shipment. To compare the variation in percentage impurities for the two suppliers, the manufacturer selects 10 shipments from each of the two suppliers and measures the percentage of impurities in the raw material for each shipment. The sample means and variances are shown in the table. $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{ll} \text { Supplier } \mathrm{A} & \text { Supplier } \mathrm{B} \\ \hline \bar{x}_{1}=1.89 & \bar{x}_{2}=1.85 \\ s_{1}^{2}=.273 & s_{2}^{2}=.094 \end{array}\\\ &n_{1}=10 \quad n_{2}=10 \end{aligned} $$ a. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the variability of the shipment impurity levels for the two suppliers? Test using \(\alpha=.01 .\) Based on the results of your test, what recommendation would you make to the pharmaceutical manufacturer? b. Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(\sigma_{2}^{2}\) and interpret your results.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Also, provide the 99% confidence interval for supplier B's impurity level variance. There is not sufficient evidence to indicate a significant difference in variability between the shipments from the two suppliers, as the F-ratio falls within the critical values. The 99% confidence interval for supplier B's impurity level variance is (0.033, 0.456).

Step by step solution

01

Identify the given information

We have been given: - Sample sizes: \(n_1 = n_2 = 10\) - Sample means: \(\bar{x}_1 = 1.89\) and \(\bar{x}_2 = 1.85\) - Sample variances: \(s_1^2 = 0.273\) and \(s_2^2 = 0.094\) - Significance level: \(\alpha = 0.01\)
02

Calculate the F-ratio

Now, we need to calculate the F-ratio. For the F-test, we'll compare the ratio of variances. To do that, we'll divide the larger variance by the smaller one: $$ F = \frac{s_1^2}{s_2^2} = \frac{0.273}{0.094} \approx 2.904 $$
03

Determine the degrees of freedom

The degrees of freedom for each sample are \(n_1 - 1\) and \(n_2 - 1\). So, we have: $$ df_1 = n_1 - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9 $$ $$ df_2 = n_2 - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9 $$
04

Find the F-critical values

Using the F distribution table, or an F-distribution calculator, we'll find the F-critical values at \(\alpha = 0.01\) and the given degrees of freedom, \(df_1 = 9\) and \(df_2 = 9\). We get: $$ F_\text{lower} = 0.166 $$ $$ F_\text{upper} = 6.000 $$
05

Compare the F-ratio with critical values

Now, we'll compare the calculated F-ratio with the critical values: If \(F_\text{lower} < F < F_\text{upper}\), we cannot reject the null hypothesis, meaning that there is not sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in variability. $$ 0.166 < 2.904 < 6.000 $$ Since the F-ratio is within the critical values, we cannot reject the null hypothesis. This means there is not sufficient evidence to indicate a significant difference in variability between the shipments from the two suppliers. The recommendation for the pharmaceutical manufacturer would be that there is no significant difference in the variability of shipment impurity levels between the two suppliers, so both suppliers can be considered as having a similar range of variability concerning impurity levels at the 1% significance level.
06

Part b: 99% confidence interval for Supplier B's variance

In order to find the confidence interval for the variance of supplier B, we need to use the following formula: $$ \frac{(n - 1) s^2}{\chi^2_\text{upper}} < \sigma^2 < \frac{(n - 1) s^2}{\chi^2_\text{lower}} $$ We have: - Sample size: \(n = 10\) - Sample variance: \(s^2 = 0.094\) - Significance level: 1 - 0.99 = 0.01 - Degrees of freedom: \(n - 1 = 9\) Using a chi-square distribution table, we can find the chi-square values: $$ \chi^2_\text{lower} \approx 1.735 $$ $$ \chi^2_\text{upper} \approx 23.589 $$ Now, we can calculate the confidence interval: $$ \frac{(10 - 1) 0.094}{23.589} < \sigma^2 < \frac{(10 - 1) 0.094}{1.735} $$ $$ 0.033 < \sigma^2 < 0.456 $$ So, the 99% confidence interval for supplier B's impurity level variance is (0.033, 0.456). This means that we are 99% confident that the true variance of impurity levels from supplier B shipments lies between 0.033 and 0.456.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

F-test
The F-test is a statistical test used to compare the variances of two samples to determine if they come from populations with the same variance. In the context of the variance analysis for the pharmaceutical manufacturer, the F-test helps us understand if there is a significant difference in the variability of impurity levels between two suppliers.

To perform an F-test, we calculate the F-ratio, which is the ratio of the larger sample variance to the smaller sample variance. This ratio helps assess the difference in variability between the two groups.

In our exercise, we calculate the F-ratio by dividing the variance of supplier A by that of supplier B: \( F = \frac{s_1^2}{s_2^2} = \frac{0.273}{0.094} \approx 2.904 \).

A significant F-ratio indicates that the variances are unlikely to have come from populations with equal variances. If the calculated F-ratio falls outside the range of critical values, we reject the null hypothesis of equal variances.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values within which we expect the true population parameter to lie with a certain level of confidence. In this exercise, we calculate a 99% confidence interval for the variance of supplier B's shipment impurity levels.

To do this, we use the chi-square distribution, given the variance follows a chi-square distribution when sample variance data is used.

The formula is: \[ \frac{(n - 1) s^2}{\chi^2_{\text{upper}}} < \sigma^2 < \frac{(n - 1) s^2}{\chi^2_{\text{lower}}} \] where \( n \) is the sample size, \( s^2 \) is the sample variance, and \( \chi^2_{\text{lower}} \) and \( \chi^2_{\text{upper}} \) are chi-square values.

In our case, we find the confidence interval is approximately from 0.033 to 0.456. This means there's a 99% chance that the true variance of supplier B's impurity levels lies within this range. This helps in making informed decisions about supplier variability.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of Freedom (df) are an essential concept in statistics that refers to the number of independent values or quantities which can be assigned to a statistical distribution. They are crucial in calculating accurate test statistics such as the F-test or the t-test.

In the context of our variance analysis, for each supplier, the degrees of freedom is calculated as the sample size minus one: \( df = n - 1 \).

For both suppliers A and B, since \( n = 10 \), the degrees of freedom is calculated as follows: \( df_1 = n_1 - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9 \) and \( df_2 = n_2 - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9 \).

Degrees of freedom are used not only to determine the distribution of the test statistic but also to find critical values from statistical tables like the F-distribution table. This helps ensure the results from these tests are accurate and reliable.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted by \( \alpha \), is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. It is a threshold set by the researcher to limit the risk of a Type I error, which occurs when a true null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected.

In our exercise, the significance level is set at 1%, or \( \alpha = 0.01 \).

This low significance level indicates a stringent criterion, suggesting the analysis is conservative. In other words, the results need to be very strong to conclude that there is a significant difference in the variances of impurities between the suppliers.

At a 1% significance level, we would only reject the null hypothesis and claim a significant difference in variability if the calculated F-ratio is greater than the critical value obtained from the F-distribution table. This conservative approach helps ensure that any conclusions drawn are robust and not due to random variations in the data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A comparison of the precisions of two machines developed for extracting juice from oranges is to be made using the following data: $$ \begin{array}{ll} \text { Machine A } & \text { Machine B } \\ \hline s^{2}=3.1 \text { ounces }^{2} & s^{2}=1.4 \text { ounces }^{2} \\ n=25 & n=25 \end{array} $$ a. Is there sufficient evidence to indicate that there is a difference in the precision of the two machines at the \(5 \%\) level of significance? b. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the ratio of the two population variances. Does this interval confirm your conclusion from part a? Explain.

The calcium (Ca) content of a powdered mineral substance was analyzed 10 times with the following percent compositions recorded: $$ \begin{array}{lllll} .0271 & .0282 & .0279 & .0281 & .0268 \\ .0271 & .0281 & .0269 & .0275 & .0276 \end{array} $$ a. Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the true calcium content of this substance. b. What does the phrase "99\% confident" mean? c. What assumptions must you make about the sampling procedure so that this confidence interval will be valid? What does this mean to the chemist who is performing the analysis?

The stability of measurements on a manufactured product is important in maintaining product quality. A manufacturer of lithium batteries, such as the ones used for digital cameras, suspected that one of the production lines was producing batteries with a wide variation in length of life. To test this theory, he randomly selected \(n\) \(=50\) batteries from the suspect line and \(n=50\) from a line that was judged to be "in control." He then measured the length of time (in hours) until depletion to \(0.85 \mathrm{~V}\) with a 5-Ohm load for both samples. The sample means and variances for the two samples were as follows: $$ \begin{array}{ll} \text { Suspect Line } & \text { Line "in Control" } \\ \hline \bar{x}_{1}=9.40 & \bar{x}_{2}=9.25 \\ s_{1}=.25 & s_{2}=.12 \end{array} $$ a. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that batteries produced by the "suspect line" have a larger variance in length of life than those produced by the line that is assumed to be in control? Test using \(\alpha=.05\). b. Find the approximate \(p\) -value for the test and interpret its value. c. Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the variance ratio.

Refer to Exercise 10.94. Suppose that the word-association experiment is conducted using eight people as blocks and making a comparison of reaction times within each person; that is, each person is subjected to both stimuli in a random order. The reaction times (in seconds) for the experiment are as follows: $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \text { Person } & \text { Stimulus } 1 & \text { Stimulus 2 } \\ \hline 1 & 3 & 4 \\ 2 & 1 & 2 \\ 3 & 1 & 3 \\ 4 & 2 & 1 \\ 5 & 1 & 2 \\ 6 & 2 & 3 \\ 7 & 3 & 3 \\ 8 & 2 & 3 \end{array} $$ Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in mean reaction times for the two stimuli? Test using \(\alpha=.05 .\)

A psychologist wishes to verify that a certain drug increases the reaction time to a given stimulus. The following reaction times (in tenths of a second) were recorded before and after injection of the drug for each of four subjects: Test at the \(5 \%\) level of significance to determine whether the drug significantly increases reaction time.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free