Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Independent random samples from two normal populations produced the variances listed here: $$ \begin{array}{cc} \text { Sample Size } & \text { Sample Variance } \\ \hline 16 & 55.7 \\ 20 & 31.4 \end{array} $$ a. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that \(\sigma_{1}^{2}\) differs from \(\sigma_{2}^{2}\) ? Test using \(\alpha=.05\). b. Find the approximate \(p\) -value for the test and interpret its value.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain your answer by mentioning the conclusion from the hypothesis test and the comparison of p-value and significance level.

Step by step solution

01

State the hypotheses

We will write the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) for this exercise. The null hypothesis would be that the population variances are equal, while the alternative hypothesis would be they are different. Null hypothesis (\(H_0\)): \(\sigma_1^2 = \sigma_2^2\) Alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)): \(\sigma_1^2 \neq \sigma_2^2\)
02

Calculate the test statistic

We will use the F-test statistic for testing the hypothesis. The formula for the F-test statistic is: F = \(\frac{S_1^2}{S_2^2}\) Where, \(S_1^2\) and \(S_2^2\) are the sample variances. Using the given data, \(S_1^2 = 55.7\) and \(S_2^2 = 31.4\) F = \(\frac{55.7}{31.4}\) F ≈ 1.773
03

Find the critical values and p-value

For this step, we need to find the critical values using the F distribution table based on the given significance level (\(\alpha = 0.05\)) and degrees of freedom. The degrees of freedom are calculated as: df1 = n1 - 1 (for sample 1) df2 = n2 - 1 (for sample 2) Using the given sample sizes, df1 = 16 - 1 = 15 df2 = 20 - 1 = 19 With \(\alpha = 0.05\), and df1 = 15 and df2 = 19, we find the critical values from the F-distribution table: Lower critical value (F1) ≈ 0.470 Upper critical value (F2) ≈ 2.152 We also need to calculate the p-value. Using an F-distribution calculator or relevant software, input the F statistic (F = 1.773) and the degrees of freedom (df1 = 15, df2 = 19). We obtain the p-value: p-value ≈ 0.073
04

Draw a conclusion based on the p-value and the significance level

Now, we will compare the p-value with the given significance level \(\alpha=0.05\) to decide whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis. Since the p-value (≈ 0.073) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we do not have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population variances differ. Moreover, the test statistic, F ≈ 1.773, falls between the lower critical value (0.470) and the upper critical value (2.152), which also indicates that we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

F-test
The F-test is a statistical method used to compare two variances to see if they are significantly different from one another. It is called an F-test because it uses the F-distribution, a type of probability distribution that arises when two variances are compared. The test statistic for an F-test is calculated using the formula: \[ F = \frac{S_1^2}{S_2^2} \]Where \(S_1^2\) and \(S_2^2\) are the sample variances. If \(F\) is significantly high or low compared to a critical value from the F-distribution table, it suggests the variances are different.The F-test is used often in Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and is vital for assessing group variability in stats. This test requires certain assumptions:
  • Both samples should come from normal distributions.
  • The samples should be independent of each other.
  • The ratio of sample variances should be larger than 1.
Understanding F-tests helps ensure the decisions about variance are statistically sound and not by random chance.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), is a statement in hypothesis testing that signifies no effect or no difference. It's often the hypothesis that the experiment seeks to nullify. For example, in our exercise, the null hypothesis is that the population variances are equal: \[H_0: \sigma_1^2 = \sigma_2^2 \]The null hypothesis acts as a starting point for statistical analysis. The aim is usually to collect enough evidence to reject this hypothesis. If the null is rejected, it suggests that the alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) is valid, which in this case would mean that the variances are indeed different. In hypothesis testing, formulating the null hypothesis precisely and understanding its role is crucial. This ensures that statistical interpretations remain clear, consistent, and defensible.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted by \(\alpha\), is a threshold set by the researcher to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis. It represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true, also known as the Type I error rate. Common choices for the significance level are \(\alpha = 0.05\), \(\alpha = 0.01\), and \(\alpha = 0.10\). For our problem, the significance level is \(0.05\), which suggests a 5% risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis.Choosing the appropriate \(\alpha\) is essential as it influences the reliability of the test results. A lower significance level requires more substantial evidence against the null hypothesis before it can be rejected. This plays a pivotal role in hypothesis testing by serving as a basis for decision-making.
p-value
The p-value is a crucial element in hypothesis testing that helps determine the significance of the results. It represents the probability of observing a test statistic at least as extreme as the one calculated, assuming the null hypothesis is true. A lower p-value suggests stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.In our exercise, we calculated a p-value of approximately \(0.073\). Since this value is greater than the significance level \(\alpha\) of \(0.05\), we cannot reject the null hypothesis. This means that the observed difference in variances could easily occur by random chance.To interpret the p-value properly:
  • If \(p \leq \alpha\): Reject the null hypothesis. Sufficient evidence to support \(H_a\).
  • If \(p > \alpha\): Fail to reject \(H_0\). Insufficient evidence to support \(H_a\).
The p-value gives a quantitative measure to assist in decision-making. It's vital for drawing conclusions about the hypothesis' validity.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What assumptions are made when Student's \(t\) -test is used to test a hypothesis concerning a population mean?

An experiment was conducted to compare the mean reaction times to twotypes of traffic signs: prohibitive (No Left Turn) and permissive (Left Turn Only). Ten drivers were included in the experiment. Each driver was presented with 40 traffic signs, 20 prohibitive and 20 permissive, in random order. The mean time to reaction (in milliseconds) was recorded for each driver and is shown here a. Explain why this is a paired-difference experiment and give reasons why the pairing should be useful in increasing information on the difference between the mean reaction times to prohibitive and permissive traffic signs. b. Use the Excel printout to determine whether there is a significant difference in mean reaction times to prohibitive and permissive traffic signs. Use the \(p\) -value approach.

In a study to determine which factors predict who will benefit from treatment for bulimia nervosa, an article in the British Journal of Clinical Psychology indicates that self-esteem was one of these important predictors. \({ }^{4}\) The table gives the mean and standard deviation of self-esteem scores prior to treatment, at posttreatment, and during a follow-up: $$ \begin{array}{lccc} & \text { Pretreatment } & \text { Posttreatment } & \text { Follow-up } \\ \hline \text { Sample Mean } \bar{x} & 20.3 & 26.6 & 27.7 \\ \text { Standard Deviation } s & 5.0 & 7.4 & 8.2 \\ \text { Sample Size } n & 21 & 21 & 20 \end{array} $$ a. Use a test of hypothesis to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true pretreatment mean is less than \(25 .\) b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the true posttreatment mean. c. In Section \(10.4,\) we will introduce small-sample techniques for making inferences about the difference between two population means. Without the formality of a statistical test, what are you willing to conclude about the differences among the three sampled population means represented by the results in the table?

The effect of alcohol consumption on the body appears to be much greater at high altitudes than at sea level. To test this theory, a scientist randomly selects 12 subjects and randomly divides them into two groups of six each. One group is put into a chamber that simulates conditions at an altitude of 12,000 feet, and each subject ingests a drink containing 100 cubic centimeters (cc) of alcohol. The second group receives the same drink in a chamber that simulates conditions at sea level. After 2 hours, the amount of alcohol in the blood (grams per 100 cc ) for each subject is measured. The data are shown in the table. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to support the theory that average amount of alcohol in the blood after 2 hours is greater at high altitudes? $$ \begin{array}{cc} \text { Sea Level } & 12,000 \text { Feet } \\ \hline .07 & .13 \\ .10 & .17 \\ .09 & .15 \\ .12 & .14 \\ .09 & .10 \\ .13 & .14 \end{array} $$

Independent random samples of \(n_{1}=16\) and \(n_{2}=13\) observations were selected from two normal populations with equal variances: $$ \begin{array}{lrr} & & {\text { Population }} \\ { 2 - 3 } & 1 & 2 \\ \hline \text { Sample Size } & 16 & 13 \\ \text { Sample Mean } & 34.6 & 32.2 \\ \text { Sample Variance } & 4.8 & 5.9 \end{array} $$ a. Suppose you wish to detect a difference between the population means. State the null and alternative hypotheses for the test. b. Find the rejection region for the test in part a for \(\alpha=.01\) c. Find the value of the test statistic. d. Find the approximate \(p\) -value for the test. e. Conduct the test and state your conclusions.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free