Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A paired-difference experiment was conducted using \(n=10\) pairs of observations. a. Test the null hypothesis \(H_{0}:\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)=0\) against \(H_{\mathrm{a}}:\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right) \neq 0\) for \(\alpha=.05, \bar{d}=.3,\) and \(s_{d}^{2}=\) .16. Give the approximate \(p\) -value for the test. b. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\). c. How many pairs of observations do you need if you want to estimate \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\) correct to within .1 with probability equal to \(.95 ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\). Determine the required number of observation pairs to estimate \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\) correctly to within 0.1 with a probability of 0.95. **Answer:** The approximate p-value for the test is 0.0424. The \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\) is approximately (0.0459, 0.5541). The required number of observation pairs to estimate \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\) correctly to within 0.1 with a probability of 0.95 is 21 pairs.

Step by step solution

01

Perform the t-test

To test the null hypothesis \(H_{0}:\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)=0\) versus the alternative hypothesis \(H_{\mathrm{a}}:\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right) \neq 0\), we use the t-test. The test statistic is given by: $$ t=\frac{\bar{d}-\Delta_{0}}{\frac{s_{d}}{\sqrt{n}}} $$ Substitute the given values of \(\bar{d}=0.3,\Delta_0=0,s_d^2=0.16\) (which gives \(s_d=\sqrt{0.16} =0.4\)) and \(n=10\) into the formula to calculate the test statistic.
02

Calculate the test statistic

We plug in the values into the formula to get: $$ t=\frac{0.3-0}{\frac{0.4}{\sqrt{10}}}=\frac{0.3}{0.4/\sqrt{10}} \approx 2.3717 $$ Our test statistic, t, is approximately 2.3717. Since the alternative hypothesis \(H_{\mathrm{a}}:\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right) \neq 0\) is a two-tailed test, we have to calculate the two-tailed p-value.
03

Calculate the p-value

To calculate the p-value, we need to find the probability that a t-distributed random variable with 9 degrees of freedom (which is equal to \(n-1\)) would be greater than the calculated test statistic in absolute value. Using a t-distribution table or a calculator, we find that the p-value is approximately \(2(1 - P(T_9 > 2.3717)) \approx 0.0424\). **b. Find \(95 \%\) Confidence Interval**
04

Identify the formula

A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\) can be calculated using the following formula: $$ CI = \left(\bar{d} - t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s_{d}}{\sqrt{n}}, \bar{d} + t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s_{d}}{\sqrt{n}}\right) $$ We already have values for \(\bar{d}=0.3\) and \(s_{d}=0.4\). We need the critical t-value \(t_{\alpha/2}\) for a two-tailed test with 9 degrees of freedom and a 0.025 significance level on each tail.
05

Find critical t-value

Using a t-distribution table or a calculator, we find the critical t-value \(t_{\alpha/2} \approx 2.2622\).
06

Calculate confidence interval

Plug in the values into the formula to calculate the confidence interval: $$ CI=\left(0.3 - 2.2622\frac{0.4}{\sqrt{10}}, 0.3 + 2.2622\frac{0.4}{\sqrt{10}}\right) \approx (0.0459, 0.5541) $$ The \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\) is approximately (0.0459, 0.5541). **c. Determine required number of observation pairs**
07

Identify the formula

The sample size needed to estimate \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\) correct to within 0.1 with probability equal to 0.95 is given by: $$ n = \left(\frac{t_{\alpha/2}s_d}{E}\right)^2 $$ Here, \(t_{\alpha/2}\) is the critical t-value for a two-tailed test with a 0.025 significance level on each tail (same as in part b), \(s_d=0.4\) and \(E=0.1\).
08

Calculate the required number of pairs

Plug in the values to calculate the required number of pairs: $$ n = \left(\frac{2.2622 \times 0.4}{0.1}\right)^2 \approx 20.4368 $$ Since we cannot have a fraction of an observation, we round up the value to the nearest whole number, which is 21. Thus, 21 pairs of observations are required if we want to estimate \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\) correct to within 0.1 with probability equal to 0.95.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to make inferences about population parameters based on sample data. It involves setting up two competing hypotheses: the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)). The null hypothesis typically suggests no effect or no difference, whereas the alternative implies some effect or difference.

In the context of a paired difference test, we are interested in examining if there is a difference between two related groups. For example, this could involve testing if a new treatment is more effective than an old one within the same group of subjects. In this exercise, we conduct a t-test to determine if the difference in means between two paired samples is significant.

The t-test formula for paired samples is given by:\[ t = \frac{\bar{d} - \Delta_0}{s_d/\sqrt{n}}\]where \(\bar{d}\) is the mean of differences, \(\Delta_0\) is the hypothesized difference (often 0), \(s_d\) is the standard deviation of differences, and \(n\) is the number of pairs. A key step in hypothesis testing is calculating the test statistic, which is then used to find the p-value. The p-value indicates the probability of observing the test results under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. If the p-value is smaller than the pre-set significance level (\(\alpha = 0.05\)), we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values within which we expect the true population parameter to lie, with a certain level of confidence. A 95% confidence interval implies that if we were to repeat the study many times, approximately 95% of the calculated intervals would contain the true difference in means.

To calculate a confidence interval for a paired difference, we use:\[CI = \left(\bar{d} - t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s_{d}}{\sqrt{n}}, \bar{d} + t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s_{d}}{\sqrt{n}}\right)\]Here, \(t_{\alpha/2}\) is the critical value from the t-distribution associated with the desired confidence level, and \(n-1\) is used as the degrees of freedom. In our exercise, for 9 degrees of freedom and a significance level of 0.025 in each tail, the critical t-value is found to be approximately 2.2622.

Plugging in the given values, \(\bar{d} = 0.3\) and \(s_{d} = 0.4\), the calculated confidence interval is approximately (0.0459, 0.5541). This means we are 95% confident that the actual difference in means lies within this interval. A confidence interval not including zero supports the hypothesis of a significant difference between the paired samples.
Sample Size Calculation
Calculating the appropriate sample size is crucial in designing an experiment to ensure the study has sufficient power to detect a true effect. The sample size required depends on several factors, including the desired precision of the estimate, confidence level, and variability in the data.

To determine the number of paired observations needed for a certain precision, we use the formula:\[n = \left(\frac{t_{\alpha/2}s_d}{E}\right)^2\]where \(E\) represents the margin of error, and \(t_{\alpha/2}\) is the critical t-value based on the desired confidence level. In this exercise, we wish to estimate the difference within an error margin of 0.1 with a 95% confidence level. The standard deviation \(s_{d}\) is given as 0.4, and the critical t-value is 2.2622.

Plugging these values into the formula, we find that we need approximately 20.4368 pairs. Rounding up gives us 21 pairs. This ensures that our estimates are precise enough to meet the chosen level of confidence and accuracy, highlighting the importance of planning adequately to achieve reliable results in hypothesis testing.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to Exercise 10.7 , in which we measured the dissolved oxygen content in river water to determine whether a stream had sufficient oxygen to support aquatic life. A pollution control inspector suspected that a river community was releasing amounts of semitreated sewage into a river. To check his theory, he drew five randomly selected specimens of river water at a location above the town, and another five below. The dissolved oxygen readings (in parts per million) are as follows: $$ \begin{array}{l|lllll} \text { Above Town } & 4.8 & 5.2 & 5.0 & 4.9 & 5.1 \\ \hline \text { Below Town } & 5.0 & 4.7 & 4.9 & 4.8 & 4.9 \end{array} $$ a. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the mean oxygen content below the town is less than the mean oxygen content above? Test using \(\alpha=.05\). b. Suppose you prefer estimation as a method of inference. Estimate the difference in the mean dissolved oxygen contents for locations above and below the town. Use a \(95 \%\) confidence interval.

An article in American Demographics investigated consumer habits at the mall. We tend to spend the most money shopping on the weekends, and, in particular, on Sundays from 4 to 6 P.M. Wednesday morning shoppers spend the least! \({ }^{19}\) Suppose that a random sample of 20 weekend shoppers and a random sample of 20 weekday shoppers were selected, and the amount spent per trip to the mall was recorded. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Weekends } & \text { Weekdays } \\ \hline \text { Sample Size } & 20 & 20 \\ \text { Sample Mean (\$) } & 78 & 67 \\ \text { Sample Standard Deviation (\$) } & 22 & 20 \end{array} $$ a. Is it reasonable to assume that the two population variances are equal? Use the \(F\) -test to test this hypothesis with \(\alpha=.05\). b. Based on the results of part a, use the appropriate test to determine whether there is a difference in the average amount spent per trip on weekends versus weekdays. Use \(\alpha=.05\).

In a study to determine which factors predict who will benefit from treatment for bulimia nervosa, an article in the British Journal of Clinical Psychology indicates that self-esteem was one of these important predictors. \({ }^{4}\) The table gives the mean and standard deviation of self-esteem scores prior to treatment, at posttreatment, and during a follow-up: $$ \begin{array}{lccc} & \text { Pretreatment } & \text { Posttreatment } & \text { Follow-up } \\ \hline \text { Sample Mean } \bar{x} & 20.3 & 26.6 & 27.7 \\ \text { Standard Deviation } s & 5.0 & 7.4 & 8.2 \\ \text { Sample Size } n & 21 & 21 & 20 \end{array} $$ a. Use a test of hypothesis to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true pretreatment mean is less than \(25 .\) b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the true posttreatment mean. c. In Section \(10.4,\) we will introduce small-sample techniques for making inferences about the difference between two population means. Without the formality of a statistical test, what are you willing to conclude about the differences among the three sampled population means represented by the results in the table?

A precision instrument is guaranteed to read accurately to within 2 units. A sample of four instrument readings on the same object yielded the measurements \(353,351,351,\) and \(355 .\) a. Test the null hypothesis that \(\sigma=.7\) against the alternative \(\sigma>.7\). Use \(\alpha=.05 .\) b. Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the population variance.

A production plant has two complex fabricating systems, both of which are maintained at 2 -week intervals. However, one system is twice as old as the other. The number of finished products fabricated daily by each of the systems is recorded for 30 working days, with the results given in the table. Do these data present sufficient evidence to conclude that the variability in daily production warrants increased maintenance of the older fabricating system? Use the \(p\) -value approach. $$ \begin{array}{ll} \text { New System } & \text { Old System } \\ \hline \bar{x}_{1}=246 & \bar{x}_{2}=240 \\ s_{1}=15.6 & s_{2}=28.2 \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free