Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

An article in American Demographics investigated consumer habits at the mall. We tend to spend the most money shopping on the weekends, and, in particular, on Sundays from 4 to 6 P.M. Wednesday morning shoppers spend the least! \({ }^{19}\) Suppose that a random sample of 20 weekend shoppers and a random sample of 20 weekday shoppers were selected, and the amount spent per trip to the mall was recorded. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Weekends } & \text { Weekdays } \\ \hline \text { Sample Size } & 20 & 20 \\ \text { Sample Mean (\$) } & 78 & 67 \\ \text { Sample Standard Deviation (\$) } & 22 & 20 \end{array} $$ a. Is it reasonable to assume that the two population variances are equal? Use the \(F\) -test to test this hypothesis with \(\alpha=.05\). b. Based on the results of part a, use the appropriate test to determine whether there is a difference in the average amount spent per trip on weekends versus weekdays. Use \(\alpha=.05\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: No, there is no significant difference between the average amount spent per trip on weekends versus weekdays at the α=0.05 level of significance.

Step by step solution

01

Part a: Testing equality of variances using F-test

Formulate the hypothesis: - Null hypothesis (H0): Variances of two populations are equal, \(σ_1^2 = σ_2^2\). - Alternative hypothesis (H1): Variances of two populations are not equal, \(σ_1^2 ≠ σ_2^2\). For the F-test, we will use the given samples and the significance level α=0.05: 1. Calculate the F statistic. F = (Sample variance 1) / (Sample variance 2) = \((\frac{22^2}{20^2})\) = \(\frac{484}{400} = 1.21\). 2. Determine the degrees of freedom for both samples. df1 = n1 - 1 = 20 - 1 = 19 and df2 = n2 - 1 = 20 - 1 = 19. 3. Find the critical values for the F-distribution using the F-table. For \(\alpha = 0.05\) and df1 = df2 = 19, the critical values are F(0.025, 19, 19) = 2.34 and F(0.975, 19, 19) = 0.43. 4. Compare the F statistic to the critical values. If the F statistic falls within the critical values range, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. If not, we reject the null hypothesis. Since 1.21 is between the critical values 0.43 and 2.34, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, we can assume that the population variances are equal.
02

Part b: Comparing means with appropriate test

Since we concluded that variances of two populations are equal, we will use the two-sample t-test to compare the population means. The null hypothesis (H0) is that there is no difference between the average amount spent by the two groups, and the alternative hypothesis (H1) is that there is a difference between the average amount spent by the two groups. - Null hypothesis (H0): \(\mu_1 = \mu_2\) - Alternative hypothesis (H1): \(\mu_1 ≠ \mu_2\) Using the given samples and the significance level α=0.05: 1. Compute the pooled variance: $$S_p^2 = \frac{(n_1 - 1)S_1^2 + (n_2 - 1)S_2^2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2} = \frac{(19)(22^2) + (19)(20^2)}{38} = \frac{18436}{38} = 485.42$$ 2. Compute the standard error of the difference between means: $$SE(\overline{X}_1 - \overline{X}_2) = \sqrt{\frac{S_p^2}{n_1} + \frac{S_p^2}{n_2}} = \sqrt{\frac{485.42}{20} + \frac{485.42}{20}} = 10.33$$. 3. Calculate the t statistic: $$t = \frac{(\overline{X}_1 - \overline{X}_2)}{SE(\overline{X}_1 - \overline{X}_2)} = \frac{(78 - 67)}{10.33} = 1.065$$. 4. Determine the degrees of freedom for the t-test: df = n1 + n2 - 2 = 38. 5. Find the critical t-values using the t-table for a two-tailed test with \(\alpha=0.05\) and df = 38: t(0.025, 38) = 2.024 and t(0.975, 38) = -2.024. 6. Compare the t statistic to the critical t-values. If the t statistic falls within the critical values range, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. If not, we reject the null hypothesis. Since 1.065 is between -2.024 and 2.024, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, there is no significant difference between the average amount spent per trip on weekends versus weekdays at the α=0.05 level of significance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Variances Equality
When comparing two different groups, like weekend and weekday shoppers, we often need to examine if their variances are the same. Variability, or variance, tells us how spread out the spending amounts are within each group. This concept of variances equality tests whether the differences in variability are significant or just due to random sampling.

To test this, we use the F-test, which compares the ratio of the two variances. In our example, we calculated this ratio to be 1.21. We then compared it to critical values from the F-distribution table. If the value of 1.21 falls within the range of these critical values (0.43 to 2.34), we decide the variances are equal. Here, they are equal, so we don't see a significant difference in variance between weekend and weekday spending habits.

The F-test is crucial in hypothesis testing to ensure we're using correct analyses to compare group means later. Ensuring variances equality keeps our comparisons valid and reliable.
T-Test: A Tool for Comparing Means
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the means of two groups and see if they are statistically different from each other. Since we determined that the variances are equal, a two-sample t-test is appropriate for our data on shopper spending.

The null hypothesis in this t-test states that there is no difference in the average spending between weekend and weekday shoppers (\( \mu_1 = \mu_2 \)). The alternative hypothesis suggests a difference exists (\( \mu_1 eq \mu_2 \)).

Using our sample data, we calculate a pooled variance, which helps us find the standard error of the difference in means. This pooled variance considers both groups and their size. We then compute the t-statistic by dividing the difference in sample means by this standard error. For our data, the t-statistic is 1.065, lying between the critical values -2.024 and 2.024. This result tells us there's not enough evidence to conclude a significant difference.

The t-test shows whether differences are meaningful or due to chance, guiding informed conclusions about data.
Exploring Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a structured method to make decisions based on data, like deciding if there's a difference in spending habits between different shopper groups. It begins with formulating two hypotheses: the null hypothesis (\( H_0 \)) assumes no effect or change, while the alternative hypothesis (\( H_1 \)) suggests there is a difference.

Steps in hypothesis testing include:
  • Choosing a significance level (\( \alpha \)), often set at 0.05; it represents a 5% risk of concluding a difference exists when there is none.
  • Calculating a relevant statistic (F or t in our context) from the data.
  • Comparing this statistic against critical values from statistical distribution tables.
  • Making a decision: if the statistic lies within the critical range, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we reject it.
In this process, understanding and evaluating assumptions, like equal variances, ensure the test results' accuracy and trustworthiness. Hypothesis testing allows us to draw conclusions about population-level effects based on sample data, providing an essential tool in statistics and research.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Eight obese persons were placed on a diet for 1 month, and their weights, at the beginning and at the end of the month, were recorded: $$ \begin{array}{ccc} & {\text { Weights }} \\ & & \\ \text { Subjects } & \text { Initial } & \text { Final } \\ \hline 1 & 310 & 263 \\ 2 & 295 & 251 \\ 3 & 287 & 249 \\ 4 & 305 & 259 \\ 5 & 270 & 233 \\ 6 & 323 & 267 \\ 7 & 277 & 242 \\ 8 & 299 & 265 \end{array} $$ Estimate the mean weight loss for obese persons when placed on the diet for a 1 -month period. Use a \(95 \%\) confidence interval and interpret your results. What assumptions must you make so that your inference is valid?

Jan Lindhe conducted a study on the effect of an oral antiplaque rinse on plaque buildup on teeth. \(^{6}\) Fourteen people whose teeth were thoroughly cleaned and polished were randomly assigned to two groups of seven subjects each. Both groups were assigned to use oral rinses (no brushing) for a 2 -week period. Group 1 used a rinse that contained an antiplaque agent. Group \(2,\) the control group, received a similar rinse except that, unknown to the subjects, the rinse contained no antiplaque agent. A plaque index \(x\), a measure of plaque buildup, was recorded at 14 days with means and standard deviations for the two groups shown in the table. $$ \begin{array}{lll} & \text { Control Group } & \text { Antiplaque Group } \\ \hline \text { Sample Size } & 7 & 7 \\ \text { Mean } & 1.26 & .78 \\ \text { Standard Deviation } & 32 & 32 \end{array} $$ a. State the null and alternative hypotheses that should be used to test the effectiveness of the antiplaque oral rinse b. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the oral antiplaque rinse is effective? Test using \(\alpha=.05 .\) c. Find the approximate \(p\) -value for the test.

Use Table 4 in Appendix I to find the following critical values: a. An upper one-tailed rejection region with \(\alpha=.05\) and \(11 d f\). b. A two-tailed rejection region with \(\alpha=.05\) and \(7 d f\). c. A lower one-tailed rejection region with \(\alpha=.01\) and \(15 d f\).

A manufacturer of industrial light bulbs likes its bulbs to have a mean length of life that is acceptable to its customers and a variation in length of life that is relatively small. A sample of 20 bulbs tested produced the following lengths of life (in hours): $$ \begin{array}{llllllllll} 2100 & 2302 & 1951 & 2067 & 2415 & 1883 & 2101 & 2146 & 2278 & 2019 \\ 1924 & 2183 & 2077 & 2392 & 2286 & 2501 & 1946 & 2161 & 2253 & 1827 \end{array} $$ The manufacturer wishes to control the variability in length of life so that \(\sigma\) is less than 150 hours. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the manufacturer is achieving this goal? Test using \(\alpha=.01\).

The calcium (Ca) content of a powdered mineral substance was analyzed 10 times with the following percent compositions recorded: $$ \begin{array}{lllll} .0271 & .0282 & .0279 & .0281 & .0268 \\ .0271 & .0281 & .0269 & .0275 & .0276 \end{array} $$ a. Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the true calcium content of this substance. b. What does the phrase "99\% confident" mean? c. What assumptions must you make about the sampling procedure so that this confidence interval will be valid? What does this mean to the chemist who is performing the analysis?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free