Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Give the rejection region for a test to detect negative rank correlation if the number of pairs of ranks is 12 and you have these \(\alpha\) -values: a. \(\alpha=.05\) b. \(\alpha=.01\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: For a significance level of 0.05, the rejection region for negative rank correlation is when the calculated Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs) is less than -0.576. And for a significance level of 0.01, the rejection region for negative rank correlation is when the calculated rs is less than -0.760.

Step by step solution

01

Find the critical values

To find the critical values for the given significance levels (\(\alpha=0.05\) and \(\alpha=0.01\)) and sample size (number of pairs of ranks, n = 12), you should consult a table of critical values for Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (\(r_s\)). This table usually lists the critical values for a two-tailed test, so you will need to find the one-tailed critical values by halving the significance levels: a. For \(\alpha=0.05\), the one-tailed significance level is \(\frac{0.05}{2} = 0.025\). b. For \(\alpha=0.01\), the one-tailed significance level is \(\frac{0.01}{2} = 0.005\). Now look up the critical values in the \(r_s\) table using the one-tailed significance levels and the number of pairs of ranks (12). You will find the following critical values: a. For \(\alpha=0.05\) (0.025 in one-tailed test), the critical value is approximately \(\pm0.576\) b. For \(\alpha=0.01\) (0.005 in one-tailed test), the critical value is approximately \(\pm0.760\)
02

Determine the rejection region for negative rank correlation

Now that you have the critical values, you can determine the rejection regions for negative rank correlation: a. For \(\alpha=0.05\), the rejection region for negative rank correlation (given by \(r_s<0\)) is \(r_s<-0.576\). If the calculated \(r_s\) is less than -0.576, you can reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis (negative rank correlation) at the 0.05 significance level. b. For \(\alpha=0.01\), the rejection region for negative rank correlation (given by \(r_s<0\)) is \(r_s<-0.760\). If the calculated \(r_s\) is less than -0.760, you can reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis (negative rank correlation) at the 0.01 significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A paired-difference experiment was conducted to compare two populations. The data are shown in the table. Use a sign test to determine whether the population distributions are different. a. State the null and alternative hypotheses for the test. b. Determine an appropriate rejection region with \(\alpha \approx .01\) c. Calculate the observed value of the test statistic. d. Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that populations 1 and 2 are different?

A political scientist wished to examine the relationship between the voter image of a conservative political candidate and the distance (in miles) between the residences of the voter and the candidate. Each of 12 voters rated the candidate on a scale of 1 to \(20 .\) a. Calculate Spearman's rank correlation coefficient \(r_{s}\) b. Do these data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a negative correlation between rating and distance?

A study reported in the American Journal of Public Health (Science News) - the first to follow blood lead levels in law abiding handgun hobbyists using indoor firing ranges-documents a significant risk of lead poisoning. \({ }^{3}\) Lead exposure measurements were made on 17 members of a law enforcement trainee class before, during, and after a 3 -month period of firearm instruction at a state-owned indoor firing range. No trainee had elevated blood lead levels before the training, but 15 of the 17 ended their training with blood lead levels deemed "elevated" by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). If the use of an indoor firing range causes no increase in blood lead levels, then \(p\), the probability that a person's blood lead level increases, is less than or equal to .5. If, however, use of the indoor firing range causes an increase in a person's blood lead levels, then \(p>.5\). Use the sign test to determine whether using an indoor firing range has the effect of increasing a person's blood lead level with \(\alpha=.05 .\) (HINT: The normal approximation to binomial probabilities is fairly accurate for \(n=17 .\) )

Suppose you wish to detect a difference in the locations of two population distributions based on a paired-difference experiment consisting of \(n=30\) pairs. a. Give the null and alternative hypotheses for the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. b. Give the test statistic. c. Give the rejection region for the test for \(\alpha=.05\). d. If \(T^{+}=249,\) what are your conclusions? [NOTE: \(T^{+}+T^{-}=n(n+1) / 2 .\)

In a study of the palatability of antibiotics in children, Dr. Doreen Matsui and colleagues used a voluntary sample of healthy children to assess their reactions to the taste of four antibiotics. \({ }^{4}\) The children's response was measured on a 10 -centimeter (cm) visual analog scale incorporating the use of faces, from sad (low score) to happy (high score). The minimum score was 0 and the maximum was \(10 .\) For the accompanying data (simulated from the results of Matsui's report), each of five children was asked to taste each of four antibiotics and rate them using the visual (faces) analog scale from 0 to \(10 \mathrm{~cm}\) a. What design is used in collecting these data? b. Using an appropriate statistical package for a two way classification, produce a normal probability plot of the residuals as well as a plot of residuals versus antibiotics. Do the usual analysis of variance assumptions appear to be satisfied? c. Use the appropriate nonparametric test to test for differences in the distributions of responses to the tastes of the four antibiotics. d. Comment on the results of the analysis of variance in part b compared with the nonparametric test in part \(\mathrm{c} .\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free