Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

How good are you EX1212 at estimating? To test a subject's ability to estimate sizes, he was shown 10 different objects and asked to estimate their length or diameter. The object was then measured, and the results were recorded in the table below. $$ \begin{array}{lrr} \text { Object } & \text { Estimated (inches) } & \text { Actual (inches) } \\\ \hline \text { Pencil } & 7.00 & 6.00 \\ \text { Dinner plate } & 9.50 & 10.25 \\ \text { Book 1 } & 7.50 & 6.75 \\ \text { Cell phone } & 4.00 & 4.25 \\ \text { Photograph } & 14.50 & 15.75 \\ \text { Toy } & 3.75 & 5.00 \\ \text { Belt } & 42.00 & 41.50 \\ \text { Clothespin } & 2.75 & 3.75 \\ \text { Book 2 } & 10.00 & 9.25 \\ \text { Calculator } & 3.50 & 4.75 \end{array} $$ a. Find the least-squares regression line for predicting the actual measurement as a function of the estimated measurement. b. Plot the points and the fitted line. Does the assumption of a linear relationship appear to be reasonable?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The least-squares regression line for predicting actual measurements based on estimated measurements is Y = 0.67 + 0.89X. The correlation coefficient of 0.927 indicates a strong linear relationship between the estimated and actual measurements, making the assumption of a linear relationship reasonable.

Step by step solution

01

Find the least-squares regression line

The least-squares regression line is given by the formula \(Y = a + bX\), where X is the estimated size, Y is the actual size, a represents the Y-intercept, and b represents the slope. To find the values of a and b, we need to calculate the mean values of X and Y and the standard deviations of X and Y. Mean of X: \(\bar{X} = \frac{\sum{X}}{n}\) Mean of Y: \(\bar{Y}= \frac{\sum{Y}}{n}\) Standard deviation of X: \(s_{X} = \sqrt{\frac{\sum{(X - \bar{X})^2}}{n-1}}\) Standard deviation of Y: \(s_{Y} = \sqrt{\frac{\sum{(Y - \bar{Y})^2}}{n-1}}\) Slope (b): \(b = r \frac{s_{Y}}{s_{X}}\), where r is the correlation coefficient. Y-Intercept (a): \(a = \bar{Y} - b\bar{X}\) Using the given data, we can calculate the means, standard deviations, and other values.
02

Calculate mean and standard deviations:

Mean of Estimated (X): \(\bar{X} = \frac{1}{10} \sum{X} = 6.05\) Mean of Actual (Y): \(\bar{Y} = \frac{1}{10} \sum{Y} = 6.225\) Standard deviation of Estimated (X): \(s_{X} = \sqrt{\frac{\sum{(X - 6.05)^2}}{9}} = 2.54\) Standard deviation of Actual (Y): \(s_{Y} = \sqrt{\frac{\sum{(Y - 6.225)^2}}{9}} = 2.46\) Next, we can find the correlation coefficient (r).
03

Calculate the correlation coefficient:

Correlation Coefficient (r) = \(\frac{\sum{(X - \bar{X})(Y - \bar{Y})}}{\sqrt{\sum{(X - \bar{X})^2}\sum{(Y - \bar{Y})^2}}} = 0.927\) Now, we can calculate the slope (b) and Y-intercept (a).
04

Calculate the slope and Y-intercept:

Slope (b) = \(r \frac{s_{Y}}{s_{X}} = 0.927 \times \frac{2.46}{2.54} = 0.89\) Y-Intercept (a): \(a = \bar{Y} - b\bar{X} = 6.225 - 0.89 \times 6.05 = 0.67\) The least-squares regression line is: \(Y = 0.67 + 0.89X\)
05

Plot the points and the fitted line

To check if the assumption of a linear relationship appears to be reasonable, we need to plot the points and the fitted line. This can be done using any graphing or plotting software. Once the points and the line are plotted, if the data points are closely following the line, the assumption of a linear relationship can be considered reasonable. However, if the points are scattered far from the line, the linear relationship assumption might not be warranted. In this case, the correlation coefficient of 0.927 suggests a strong linear relationship between the estimated and actual measurements, making the assumption reasonable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, commonly denoted as \( r \), is a statistical measure that describes the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. In simpler terms, it tells us how closely the estimated values follow the actual measurements in a straight line.

- The value of \( r \) ranges from \(-1\) to \(1\). Where \( r = 1 \) indicates a perfect positive linear relationship, \( r = -1 \) indicates a perfect negative linear relationship, and \( r = 0 \) means no linear relationship.
- In our example, we calculated the correlation coefficient as \( r = 0.927 \), which is close to \( 1 \). This tells us that there is a strong, positive linear relationship between the estimated and actual measurements.

It’s important to note that while a high correlation suggests a strong relationship, it does not imply causation. Factors other than estimation accuracy could be influencing the measurements.
Linear Relationship
A linear relationship between two variables suggests that a change in one variable is directly proportional to a change in the other variable. When plotted on a graph, this relationship appears as a straight line.

In our context, we're exploring the linear relationship between the estimated sizes and their actual measurements. To do this, we've used the least-squares regression line, represented in the formula as \( Y = a + bX \), where:
  • \( Y \) is the actual measurement
  • \( X \) is the estimated measurement
  • \( a \) is the Y-intercept
  • \( b \) is the slope of the line
After calculating, the regression equation for our data is \( Y = 0.67 + 0.89X \).

This implies that for every additional unit of estimated size, the actual size increases by 0.89 units, given the strong linear relationship found.
Mean and Standard Deviation
Mean and standard deviation are statistical tools that help describe the data distribution, which is essential for understanding relationships between variables.

**Mean** is the average value of a dataset and gives a central tendency of the data:
  • For estimated measurements, the mean \( \bar{X} \) was 6.05 inches.
  • For actual measurements, the mean \( \bar{Y} \) was 6.225 inches.
Calculating the mean provides a baseline for measuring variance.

**Standard deviation** measures the spread of data points around the mean. It tells us how much variation or dispersion exists from the average:
  • The standard deviation for estimated sizes \( s_{X} \) was 2.54 inches.
  • The standard deviation for actual sizes \( s_{Y} \) was 2.46 inches.
A smaller standard deviation indicates that the data points are close to the mean, while a larger standard deviation suggests more variability.
By understanding mean and standard deviation, we lay the groundwork for further analysis, such as calculating the correlation coefficient and the regression line.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What diagnostic plot can you use to determine whether the assumption of equal variance has been violated? What should the plot look like when the variances are equal for all values of \(x ?\)

Athletes and others suffering the same type of injury to the knee often require anterior and posterior ligament reconstruction. In order to determine the proper length of bone-patellar tendonbone grafts, experiments were done using three imaging techniques to determine the required length of the grafts, and these results were compared to the actual length required. A summary of the results of a simple linear regression analysis for each of these three methods is given in the following table. \({ }^{15}\) $$ \begin{array}{llrcc} \text { Imaging Technique } & \text {Coeffcient of Determination, } r^{2} & \text { Intercept } & \text { Slope } & p \text { -value } \\ \hline \text { Radiographs } & 0.80 & -3.75 & 1.031 & <0.0001 \\ \text { Standard MRI } & 0.43 & 20.29 & 0.497 & 0.011 \\ \text { 3-dimensional MRI } & 0.65 & 1.80 & 0.977 & <0.0001 \end{array} $$ a. What can you say about the significance of each of the three regression analyses? b. How would you rank the effectiveness of the three regression analyses? What is the basis of your decision? c. How do the values of \(r^{2}\) and the \(p\) -values compare in determining the best predictor of actual graft lengths of ligament required?

An experiment was designed to compare several different types of air pollution monitors. \(^{4}\) The monitor was set up, and then exposed to different concentrations of ozone, ranging between 15 and 230 parts per million (ppm) for periods of \(8-72\) hours. Filters on the monitor were then analyzed, and the amount (in micrograms) of sodium nitrate \(\left(\mathrm{NO}_{3}\right)\) recorded by the monitor was measured. The results for one type of monitor are given in the table. $$ \begin{array}{l|llllll} \text { Ozone, } x(\mathrm{ppm} / \mathrm{hr}) & .8 & 1.3 & 1.7 & 2.2 & 2.7 & 2.9 \\ \hline \mathrm{NO}_{3}, y(\mu \mathrm{g}) & 2.44 & 5.21 & 6.07 & 8.98 & 10.82 & 12.16 \end{array} $$ a. Find the least-squares regression line relating the monitor's response to the ozone concentration. b. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that there is a linear relationship between the ozone concentration and the amount of sodium nitrate detected? c. Calculate \(r^{2}\). What does this value tell you about the effectiveness of the linear regression analysis?

Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) drew a sketch of a man, }\end{array}\( indicating that a person's armspan (measuring across the back with your arms outstretched to make a "T") is roughly equal to the person's height. To test this claim, we measured eight people with the following results: $$ \begin{array}{l|clll} \text { Person } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline \text { Armspan (inches) } & 68 & 62.25 & 65 & 69.5 \\ \text { Height (inches) } & 69 & 62 & 65 & 70 \\ \text { Person } & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\ \hline \text { Armspan (inches) } & 68 & 69 & 62 & 60.25 \\ \text { Height (inches) } & 67 & 67 & 63 & 62 \end{array} $$ a. Draw a scatterplot for armspan and height. Use the same scale on both the horizontal and vertical axes. Describe the relationship between the two variables. b. If da Vinci is correct, and a person's armspan is roughly the same as the person's height, what should the slope of the regression line be? c. Calculate the regression line for predicting height based on a person's armspan. Does the value of the slope \)b$ confirm your conclusions in part b? d. If a person has an armspan of 62 inches, what would you predict the person's height to be?

How does the coefficient of correlation measure the strength of the linear relationship between two variables \(y\) and \(x ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free