Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let the independent random variables \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) have the joint \(\mathrm{pdf}\) $$ L\left(\alpha, \beta, \sigma^{2}\right)=\left(\frac{1}{2 \pi \sigma^{2}}\right)^{n / 2} \exp \left\\{-\frac{1}{2 \sigma^{2}} \sum_{1}^{n}\left[y_{i}-\alpha-\beta\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)\right]^{2}\right\\} $$ where the given numbers \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) are not all equal. Let \(H_{0}: \beta=0(\alpha\) and \(\sigma^{2}\) unspecified). It is desired to use a likelihood ratio test to test \(H_{0}\) against all possible alternatives. Find \(\Lambda\) and see whether the test can be based on a familiar statistic. Hint: In the notation of this section, show that $$ \sum_{1}^{n}\left(Y_{i}-\hat{\alpha}\right)^{2}=Q_{3}+\widehat{\beta}^{2} \sum_{1}^{n}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)^{2} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Finding the likelihood ratio test statistic involves analyzing the given formula, calculating the statistic \(\Lambda\), simplifying the sum in the likelihood function, and understanding if the test can be based on a familiar statistic. The full calculation of \(\Lambda\) and its relationship to known statistics depends on the specific values of the observations and parameters.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze Given Formula

The provided formula represents the likelihood function of a linear regression model with \(n\) observations, with \(\alpha\) as the intercept, \(\beta\) as the slope, \(\sigma^2\) as the variance of errors and \(y_i\) and \(x_i\) being the dependent and independent variables, respectively. The bar notation \(\overline{x}\) denotes the mean of \(x\). The sum ranges over all observations \(i=1, \ldots, n\). The task is to evaluate the likelihood function for \(\beta = 0\).
02

Calculation of \(\Lambda\)

The likelihood ratio statistic \(\Lambda\) is calculated as the ratio of the likelihood under the null hypothesis (\(H_0: \beta=0\)) to the likelihood under the alternative (\(H_1: \beta \neq 0\)). Given the likelihood function \(L(\alpha, \beta, \sigma^{2})\), \(\Lambda\) can be calculated as \(L(\alpha, 0, \sigma_{0}^{2})/L(\alpha, \hat{\beta}, \hat{\sigma}^{2})\). Here, \((\alpha, 0, \sigma_{0}^{2})\) are the parameter values under \(H_0\) and \((\alpha, \hat{\beta}, \hat{\sigma}^{2})\) are those that maximize the likelihood under \(H_1\)
03

Simplify Summation

To simplify the sum \(\sum_{1}^{n}\left(y_{i}-\alpha-\beta\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)\right)^{2}\), use the hint that shows it can be rewritten as \(\sum_{1}^{n}\left(Y_{i}-\hat{\alpha}\right)^{2}=Q_{3}+\widehat{\beta}^{2}\sum_{1}^{n}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)^{2}\). Here, \(\hat{\alpha}\) and \(\hat{\beta}\) are the estimated values of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) that maximize the likelihood under \(H_1\)
04

Determine Whether Test Can be Based on a Familiar Statistic

After calculating \(\Lambda\) and simplifying, examine the likelihood ratio statistic for its relationship to known statistics. It may be related to a Chi-square, F, or T statistic, for example.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let the independent random variables \(Y_{1}, Y_{2}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) have, respectively, the probability density functions \(N\left(\beta x_{i}, \gamma^{2} x_{i}^{2}\right), i=1,2, \ldots, n\), where the given numbers \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) are not all equal and no one is zero. Find the maximum likelihood estimators of \(\beta\) and \(\gamma^{2}\).

Show that \(\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left[Y_{i}-\alpha-\beta\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)\right]^{2}=n(\hat{\alpha}-\alpha)^{2}+(\hat{\beta}-\beta)^{2} \sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)^{2}+\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left[Y_{i}-\hat{\alpha}-\hat{\beta}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)\right]^{2}\)

A random sample of size \(n=6\) from a bivariate normal distribution yields a value of the correlation coefficient of \(0.89 .\) Would we accept or reject, at the \(5 \%\) significance level, the hypothesis that \(\rho=0 ?\)

For the two-way interaction model, \((9.5 .15)\), show that the following decomposition of sums of squares is true: $$ \begin{aligned} \sum_{i=1}^{a} \sum_{j=1}^{b} \sum_{k=1}^{c}\left(X_{i j k}-\bar{X}_{\ldots}\right)^{2}=& b c \sum_{i=1}^{a}\left(\bar{X}_{i . .}-\bar{X}_{\ldots .}\right)^{2}+a c \sum_{j=1}^{b}\left(\bar{X}_{. j .}-\bar{X}_{\ldots}\right)^{2} \\ &+c \sum_{i=1}^{a} \sum_{j=1}^{b}\left(\bar{X}_{i j .}-\bar{X}_{i . .}-\bar{X}_{. j .}+\bar{X}_{\ldots}\right)^{2} \\ &+\sum_{i=1}^{a} \sum_{j=1}^{b} \sum_{k=1}^{c}\left(X_{i j k}-\bar{X}_{i j .}\right)^{2} \end{aligned} $$ that is, the total sum of squares is decomposed into that due to row differences, that due to column differences, that due to interaction, and that within cells.

Let the independent normal random variables \(Y_{1}, Y_{2}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) have, respectively, the probability density functions \(N\left(\mu, \gamma^{2} x_{i}^{2}\right), i=1,2, \ldots, n\), where the given \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) are not all equal and no one of which is zero. Discuss the test of the hypothesis \(H_{0}: \gamma=1, \mu\) unspecified, against all alternatives \(H_{1}: \gamma \neq 1, \mu\) unspecified.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free