Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{10}\) be a random sample from a distribution that is \(N\left(\theta_{1}, \theta_{2}\right)\). Find a best test of the simple hypothesis \(H_{0}: \theta_{1}=\theta_{1}^{\prime}=0, \theta_{2}=\theta_{2}^{\prime}=1\) against the alternative simple hypothesis \(H_{1}: \theta_{1}=\theta_{1}^{\prime \prime}=1, \theta_{2}=\theta_{2}^{\prime \prime}=4\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The best test of the stated simple hypothesis against the alternative hypothesis is to reject the null hypothesis H_0 if the test statistic \(\frac{4}{5}\sum_{i=1}^{10}X_i\) is less than \(\ln2\). This indicates that the data is more likely under the alternative hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Setting Up the Likelihood Ratio Test

Under the null hypothesis \(H_{0}:\), the likelihood function is: \[ L_{H_0}(X_1, X_2, ..., X_{10}) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{5}} e^{-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{10} X_i^2 } \] Under the alternative hypothesis \(H_{1}:\), the likelihood function is: \[ L_{H_1}(X_1, X_2, ..., X_{10})=\frac{1}{(8\pi)^5} e^{-\frac{1}{8}\sum_{i=1}^{10}(X_i-1)^2} \] The likelihood ratio test statistic is then given by: \[ \lambda=\frac{L_{H_0}(X_1, ..., X_{10})}{L_{H_1}(X_1, ..., X_{10})} \]
02

Simplifying the Test Statistic

Simplify the test statistic \(\lambda\). We note that the likelihood ratio \(\lambda\) will be small if the data is 'in favor of' \(H_1\). Also, note that the decision rule for testing will reject \(H_0\) if \(\lambda<k\) for some constant K. We simplify to get: \[ \lambda=\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)^5 e^{ -\frac{1}{8}\sum_{i=1}^{10}((X_i-1)^2- X_i^2)} \] Thus our decision rule is to reject \(H_0\) if \(\lambda<k\) or equivalently: \[ \sum_{i=1}^{10}((X_i-1)^2- X_i^2)<8 \ln4-10 \ln4.\]
03

Finding the Critical Region

The above inequality will provide us the critical region. After simplification, we get: \[ \sum_{i=1}^{10}X_i^2 - 20\sum_{i=1}^{10}X_i+20 <8 \ln4-10\ln4 \] which simplifies to: \[ \frac{4}{5}\sum_{i=1}^{10}X_i < \ln2 \] So, we can conclude that our critical region is \(C=\{\; x \in R_{10} \;|\; \frac{4}{5}\sum_{i=1}^{10}X_i < \ln2 \}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be a random sample from a distribution with pdf \(f(x ; \theta)=\theta x^{\theta-1}, 00 .\) Show the likelihood has mlr in the statistic \(\prod_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}\). Use this to determine the UMP test for \(H_{0}: \theta=\theta^{\prime}\) against \(H_{1}: \theta<\theta^{\prime}\), for fixed \(\theta^{\prime}>0\).

If \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) is a random sample from a beta distribution with parameters \(\alpha=\beta=\theta>0\), find a best critical region for testing \(H_{0}: \theta=1\) against \(H_{1}: \theta=2\)

A random sample \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) arises from a distribution given by $$ H_{0}: f(x ; \theta)=\frac{1}{\theta}, \quad 0

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{10}\) be a random sample of size 10 from a Poisson distribution with parameter \(\theta\). Let \(L(\theta)\) be the joint pdf of \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{10}\). The problem is to test \(H_{0}: \theta=\frac{1}{2}\) against \(H_{1}: \theta=1\). (a) Show that \(L\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) / L(1) \leq k\) is equivalent to \(y=\sum_{1}^{n} x_{i} \geq c\). (b) In order to make \(\alpha=0.05\), show that \(H_{0}\) is rejected if \(y>9\) and, if \(y=9\), reject \(H_{0}\) with probability \(\frac{1}{2}\) (using some auxiliary random experiment). (c) If the loss function is such that \(\mathcal{L}\left(\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}\right)=\mathcal{L}(1,1)=0\) and \(\mathcal{L}\left(\frac{1}{2}, 1\right)=1\) and \(\mathcal{L}\left(1, \frac{1}{2}\right)=2\), show that the minimax procedure is to reject \(H_{0}\) if \(y>6\) and, if \(y=6\), reject \(H_{0}\) with probability \(0.08\) (using some auxiliary random experiment).

Let \(X\) have the pmf \(f(x ; \theta)=\theta^{x}(1-\theta)^{1-x}, x=0,1\), zero elsewhere. We test the simple hypothesis \(H_{0}: \theta=\frac{1}{4}\) against the alternative composite hypothesis \(H_{1}: \theta<\frac{1}{4}\) by taking a random sample of size 10 and rejecting \(H_{0}: \theta=\frac{1}{4}\) if and only if the observed values \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{10}\) of the sample observations are such that \(\sum_{1}^{10} x_{i} \leq 1\). Find the power function \(\gamma(\theta), 0<\theta \leq \frac{1}{4}\), of this test.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free