Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a normal distribution of the form \(N(\theta, 4)\). The simple hypothesis \(H_{0}: \theta=0\) is rejected, and the alternative composite hypothesis \(H_{1}: \theta>0\) is accepted if and only if the observed mean \(\bar{x}\) of a random sample of size 25 is greater than or equal to \(\frac{2}{5}\). Find the power function \(\gamma(\theta), 0 \leq \theta\), of this test.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The power Function is given by \( \gamma(\theta) = 1- \Phi(5\theta - 2)\), where \( \Phi(\cdot)\) denotes the cumulative distribution function of a standard normal distribution.

Step by step solution

01

Realize what the standard form of distribution is

The given distribution is \(N(\theta, 4)\), a normal distribution with mean \(\theta\) and variance 4. In usual practice, while computing probabilities involved in a normal distribution, we deal with standard normal distribution, which is \(N(0,1)\). Any normal distribution \(N(\mu, \sigma^2)\) can be standardized by using the transformation \(Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}\), where \(Z\) follows \(N(0, 1)\) distribution.
02

Determine the rejection region

Since the null hypothesis is rejected when observed mean \( \bar{x} \) is greater than or equal to \( \frac{2}{5} \), the rejection region \(R\) in the standardized normal distribution is given by \( R: Z \geq \frac{\frac{2}{5} - \theta}{\frac{2}{\sqrt{25}}} = \frac{\frac{2}{5} - \theta}{\frac{2}{5}} \).
03

Compute the Power function

The power function \(\gamma(\theta)\) is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis given that the true value of \(\theta\) is \(\theta\). In terms of standardized normal distribution, this is the probability that \(Z\) lies in the rejection region \(R\). This is given by \( \gamma(\theta) = P(Z \geq \frac{\frac{2}{5} - \theta}{\frac{2}{5}}) = 1 - \Phi(\frac{\frac{2}{5} - \theta}{\frac{2}{5}}) \), where \(\Phi(\cdot)\) denotes the cumulative distribution function of a standard normal distribution.
04

Simplify the Power function

\(\gamma(\theta) = 1 - \Phi(\frac{\frac{2}{5} - \theta}{\frac{2}{5}})\), after simplification, we get \( \gamma(\theta) = 1- \Phi(5\theta - 2)\) where \( \Phi(\cdot)\) denotes the cumulative distribution function of a standard normal distribution. This is the power function \(\gamma(\theta), 0 \leq \theta \) of this test.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) and \(Y_{1}, Y_{2}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) be independent random samples from two normal distributions \(N\left(\mu_{1}, \sigma^{2}\right)\) and \(N\left(\mu_{2}, \sigma^{2}\right)\), respectively, where \(\sigma^{2}\) is the common but unknown variance. (a) Find the likelihood ratio \(\Lambda\) for testing \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}=0\) against all alternatives. (b) Rewrite \(\Lambda\) so that it is a function of a statistic \(Z\) which has a well-known distribution. (c) Give the distribution of \(Z\) under both null and alternative hypotheses.

Let \(X\) have the pmf \(f(x ; \theta)=\theta^{x}(1-\theta)^{1-x}, x=0,1\), zero elsewhere. We test the simple hypothesis \(H_{0}: \theta=\frac{1}{4}\) against the alternative composite hypothesis \(H_{1}: \theta<\frac{1}{4}\) by taking a random sample of size 10 and rejecting \(H_{0}: \theta=\frac{1}{4}\) if and only if the observed values \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{10}\) of the sample observations are such that \(\sum_{1}^{10} x_{i} \leq 1\). Find the power function \(\gamma(\theta), 0<\theta \leq \frac{1}{4}\), of this test.

Let \(X\) be a random variable with pdf \(f_{X}(x)=\left(2 b_{X}\right)^{-1} \exp \left\\{-|x| / b_{X}\right\\}\), for \(-\infty0\). First, show that the variance of \(X\) is \(\sigma_{X}^{2}=2 b_{X}^{2} .\) Next, let \(Y\), independent of \(X\), have pdf \(f_{Y}(y)=\left(2 b_{Y}\right)^{-1} \exp \left\\{-|y| / b_{Y}\right\\}\), for \(-\infty0\). Consider the hypotheses $$ H_{0}: \sigma_{X}^{2}=\sigma_{Y}^{2} \text { versus } H_{1}: \sigma_{X}^{2}>\sigma_{Y}^{2} $$ To illustrate Remark \(8.3 .2\) for testing these hypotheses, consider the following data set (data are also in the file exercise8316.rda). Sample 1 represents the values of a sample drawn on \(X\) with \(b_{X}=1\), while Sample 2 represents the values of a sample drawn on \(Y\) with \(b_{Y}=1\). Hence, in this case \(H_{0}\) is true. $$ \begin{array}{|c|rrrr|} \hline \text { Sample } & -0.389 & -2.177 & 0.813 & -0.001 \\ 1 & -0.110 & -0.709 & 0.456 & 0.135 \\ \hline \text { Sample } & 0.763 & -0.570 & -2.565 & -1.733 \\ 1 & 0.403 & 0.778 & -0.115 & \\ \hline \text { Sample } & -1.067 & -0.577 & 0.361 & -0.680 \\ 2 & -0.634 & -0.996 & -0.181 & 0.239 \\ \hline \text { Sample } & -0.775 & -1.421 & -0.818 & 0.328 \\ 2 & 0.213 & 1.425 & -0.165 & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Obtain comparison boxplots of these two samples. Comparison boxplots consist of boxplots of both samples drawn on the same scale. Based on these plots, in particular the interquartile ranges, what do you conclude about \(H_{0}\) ? (b) Obtain the \(F\) -test (for a one-sided hypothesis) as discussed in Remark 8.3.2 at level \(\alpha=0.10\). What is your conclusion? (c) The test in part (b) is not exact. Why?

Let \(Y_{1}

Let \(X\) and \(Y\) have a joint bivariate normal distribution. An observation \((x, y)\) arises from the joint distribution with parameters equal to either $$ \mu_{1}^{\prime}=\mu_{2}^{\prime}=0, \quad\left(\sigma_{1}^{2}\right)^{\prime}=\left(\sigma_{2}^{2}\right)^{\prime}=1, \quad \rho^{\prime}=\frac{1}{2} $$ Ior $$ \mu_{1}^{\prime \prime}=\mu_{2}^{\prime \prime}=1, \quad\left(\sigma_{1}^{2}\right)^{\prime \prime}=4, \quad\left(\sigma_{2}^{2}\right)^{\prime \prime}=9, \quad \rho^{\prime \prime}=\frac{1}{2} \text { . } $$ Show that the classification rule involves a second-degree polynomial in \(x\) and \(y\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free