Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be a random sample from a distribution with pdf \(f(x ; \theta)=\theta x^{\theta-1}, 00 .\) Show the likelihood has mlr in the statistic \(\prod_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}\). Use this to determine the UMP test for \(H_{0}: \theta=\theta^{\prime}\) against \(H_{1}: \theta<\theta^{\prime}\), for fixed \(\theta^{\prime}>0\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The likelihood of the given pdf is \(L(\theta)= \theta^{n} \prod_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}^{\theta-1}\). The Monotone Likelihood Ratio in \(\prod_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}\) is established as \((\theta' / \theta)^n \prod_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{\theta'-\theta}\). Based on this, the UMP test rejects the null hypothesis \(H_0: \theta = \theta'\) if \(\prod_{i=1}^{n} x_{i} < k\), with \(k\) derived from the test's size condition.

Step by step solution

01

Computing Likelihood Function

As given, the pdf is \(f(x ; \theta)=\theta x^{\theta-1}, 0<x<1\) and zero elsewhere. So, we can define likelihood function \(L(\theta)\) as the joint probability function by \(L(\theta)= \prod_{i=1}^{n} f(x_i; \theta)= \theta^{n} \prod_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}^{\theta-1}\).
02

Showing Monotonic Likelihood Ratio

Next, we need to show that the likelihood ratio is a monotonically increasing function in \(\prod_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}\). The likelihood ratio is given by \( L(\theta') / L(\theta) = (\theta' / \theta)^n [\prod_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{\theta'-1}] / [\prod_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{\theta-1}] = (\theta' / \theta)^n \prod_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{\theta'-\theta}\). For any fixed \(x_1, x_2, ... , x_n\), \(L(\theta') / L(\theta)\) is a decreasing function of \(\theta\). Hence, for any \(0< s < t< 1\), \(L(s) <= L(t)\) gives \(s <= t\). So, the likelihood ratio has a monotonically increasing function in \(\prod_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}\).
03

Finding UMP Test

The null hypothesis is \(H_0: \theta = \theta'\)and alternative hypothesis is \(H_1: \theta < \theta'\). As we have already shown the likelihood ratio is a monotonically increasing function in \(\prod_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}\), applying Neyman-Pearson Lemma, we get that the uniform most powerful (UMP) test rejects \(H_0\) if \(\prod_{i=1}^{n} x_{i} < k\), where \(k\) is determined from the size condition of the test, \(E_{\theta'} (I(\prod_{i=1}^{n} X_{i} <k)) = \alpha\) where \(\alpha\) is the significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) is a random sample from a distribution having pdf of the form \(f(x ; \theta)=\theta x^{\theta-1}, 0

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be iid \(N\left(\theta_{1}, \theta_{2}\right) .\) Show that the likelihood ratio principle for testing \(H_{0}: \theta_{2}=\theta_{2}^{\prime}\) specified, and \(\theta_{1}\) unspecified, against \(H_{1}: \theta_{2} \neq \theta_{2}^{\prime}, \theta_{1}\) unspecified, leads to a test that rejects when \(\sum_{1}^{n}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)^{2} \leq c_{1}\) or \(\sum_{1}^{n}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)^{2} \geq c_{2}\) where \(c_{1}

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{10}\) be a random sample from a distribution that is \(N\left(\theta_{1}, \theta_{2}\right)\). Find a best test of the simple hypothesis \(H_{0}: \theta_{1}=\theta_{1}^{\prime}=0, \theta_{2}=\theta_{2}^{\prime}=1\) against the alternative simple hypothesis \(H_{1}: \theta_{1}=\theta_{1}^{\prime \prime}=1, \theta_{2}=\theta_{2}^{\prime \prime}=4\).

Let \(\left(X_{1}, Y_{1}\right),\left(X_{2}, Y_{2}\right), \ldots,\left(X_{n}, Y_{n}\right)\) be a random sample from a bivariate normal distribution with \(\mu_{1}, \mu_{2}, \sigma_{1}^{2}=\sigma_{2}^{2}=\sigma^{2}, \rho=\frac{1}{2}\), where \(\mu_{1}, \mu_{2}\), and \(\sigma^{2}>0\) are unknown real numbers. Find the likelihood ratio \(\Lambda\) for testing \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}=0, \sigma^{2}\) unknown against all alternatives. The likelihood ratio \(\Lambda\) is a function of what statistic that has a well- known distribution?

Consider a normal distribution of the form \(N(\theta, 4)\). The simple hypothesis \(H_{0}: \theta=0\) is rejected, and the alternative composite hypothesis \(H_{1}: \theta>0\) is accepted if and only if the observed mean \(\bar{x}\) of a random sample of size 25 is greater than or equal to \(\frac{2}{5}\). Find the power function \(\gamma(\theta), 0 \leq \theta\), of this test.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free