Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) represent a random sample from each of the distributions having the following pdfs: (a) \(f(x ; \theta)=\theta x^{\theta-1}, 0

Short Answer

Expert verified
The MLE for \(\theta\) for part (a) is \(\frac{n}{\sum_{i=1}^n \ln x_i}\), and for part (b) it is \(\min(x_i)\).

Step by step solution

01

- Compute Log-likelihood function for Part (a)

The first step is to compute the logarithm of the likelihood function, the log-likelihood. Given the pdf \(f(x ; \theta)=\theta x^{\theta-1}\), the joint likelihood of n observations is \(\prod_{i=1}^{n} \theta x_{i}^{\theta-1}\). Taking the natural log gives \(\ln L(\theta)=n \ln \theta+(\theta-1) \sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln x_{i}\).
02

- Find MLE for \(\theta\) for Part (a)

To find the MLE, take the derivative of the log-likelihood function with respect to \(\theta\), set that equal to zero and solve for \(\theta\). Differentiating and setting equal to zero, \(\frac{n}{\hat{\theta}}+\sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln x_{i}=0\), you find \(\hat{\theta}_{\text{MLE}} = \frac{n}{\sum_{i=1}^n \ln x_i}\).
03

- Compute Log-likelihood function for Part (b)

Similarly, for part (b) with pdf \(f(x ; \theta)=e^{-(x-\theta)}\), the joint likelihood of n observations is given by \(\prod_{i=1}^{n} e^{-(x_i - \theta)}\). Taking the natural log gives \(\ln L(\theta)= \sum_{i=1}^{n} - (x_i - \theta)\).
04

- Find MLE for \(\theta\) for Part (b)

As in Step 2, the MLE is found by taking the derivative of the log-likelihood function with respect to \(\theta\), setting it equal to zero, and solving for \(\theta\). Differentiating and setting equal to zero, \(\sum_{i=1}^n - (x_i - \hat{\theta})=0\), you find \(\hat{\theta}_{\text{MLE}} = \min(x_i)\). Note that the minimum value of \(x_i\) is used as the estimator because \(\theta\) is less than or equal to \(x\), as per the given distribution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, X_{3}, X_{4}, X_{5}\) be a random sample from a Cauchy distribution with median \(\theta\), that is, with pdf $$ f(x ; \underline{\theta})=\frac{1}{\pi} \frac{1}{1+(x-\theta)^{2}}, \quad-\infty

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be iid, each with the distribution having pdf \(f\left(x ; \theta_{1}, \theta_{2}\right)=\) \(\left(1 / \theta_{2}\right) e^{-\left(x-\theta_{1}\right) / \theta_{2}}, \theta_{1} \leq x<\infty,-\infty<\theta_{2}<\infty\), zero elsewhere. Find the maximum likelihood estimators of \(\theta_{1}\) and \(\theta_{2}\).

Let \(n\) independent trials of an experiment be such that \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{k}\) are the respective numbers of times that the experiment ends in the mutually exclusive and exhaustive events \(C_{1}, C_{2}, \ldots, C_{k} .\) If \(p_{i}=P\left(C_{i}\right)\) is constant throughout the \(n\) trials, then the probability of that particular sequence of trials is \(L=p_{1}^{x_{1}} p_{2}^{x_{2}} \cdots p_{k}^{x_{k}}\). (a) Recalling that \(p_{1}+p_{2}+\cdots+p_{k}=1\), show that the likelihood ratio for testing \(H_{0}: p_{i}=p_{i 0}>0, i=1,2, \ldots, k\), against all alternatives is given by $$ \Lambda=\prod_{i=1}^{k}\left(\frac{\left(p_{i 0}\right)^{x_{i}}}{\left(x_{i} / n\right)^{x_{i}}}\right) $$ (b) Show that $$ -2 \log \Lambda=\sum_{i=1}^{k} \frac{x_{i}\left(x_{i}-n p_{i 0}\right)^{2}}{\left(n p_{i}^{\prime}\right)^{2}} $$ where \(p_{i}^{\prime}\) is between \(p_{i 0}\) and \(x_{i} / n\). Hint: Expand \(\log p_{i 0}\) in a Taylor's series with the remainder in the term involving \(\left(p_{i 0}-x_{i} / n\right)^{2}\). (c) For large \(n\), argue that \(x_{i} /\left(n p_{i}^{\prime}\right)^{2}\) is approximated by \(1 /\left(n p_{i 0}\right)\) and hence \(-2 \log \Lambda \approx \sum_{i=1}^{k} \frac{\left(x_{i}-n p_{i 0}\right)^{2}}{n p_{i 0}}\) when \(H_{0}\) is true. Theorem \(6.5 .1\) says that the right-hand member of this last equation defines a statistic that has an approximate chi-square distribution with \(k-1\) degrees of freedom. Note that dimension of \(\Omega-\) dimension of \(\omega=(k-1)-0=k-1\)

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be a random sample from a distribution with pmf \(p(x ; \theta)=\theta^{x}(1-\theta)^{1-x}, x=0,1\), where \(0<\theta<1 .\) We wish to test \(H_{0}: \theta=1 / 3\) versus \(H_{1}: \theta \neq 1 / 3\). (a) Find \(\Lambda\) and \(-2 \log \Lambda\). (b) Determine the Wald-type test. (c) What is Rao's score statistic?

Let \(Y_{1}0\). (a) Show that \(\Lambda\) for testing \(H_{0}: \theta=\theta_{0}\) against \(H_{1}: \theta \neq \theta_{0}\) is \(\Lambda=\left(Y_{n} / \theta_{0}\right)^{n}\), \(Y_{n} \leq \theta_{0}\), and \(\Lambda=0\) if \(Y_{n}>\theta_{0}\) (b) When \(H_{0}\) is true, show that \(-2 \log \Lambda\) has an exact \(\chi^{2}(2)\) distribution, not \(\chi^{2}(1) .\) Note that the regularity conditions are not satisfied.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free